If anyone else would have said this, he's be labeled a "Rad'Trad"

  • Thread starter Thread starter Caveman
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Please do not take this thread off topic by discussing, yet again, the validity of SSPX. Return to the original topic, or I will have to close the thread. Thank you.
 
Jean_Anthony said:
Please do not take this thread off topic by discussing, yet again, the validity of SSPX. Return to the original topic, or I will have to close the thread. Thank you.
Click to expand...
Thank you Jean. I would like to see *all *threads on the SSPX closed for the next little while! 😉
 
Walking_Home said:
Can you provide an authorative document (from Rome) that uses the terminology of “fake trads” in reference to the SSPX. Here I do not mean terms that you make up and then apply as if they come direct from the Pope’s mouth.
Click to expand...
Sure, just find me the authoritative document (directly from the Pope) that has overturned Ecclesia Dei 🙂

Otherwise, my opinion stands.

To quote Elaine Benis :“fake, fake, fake” 🙂
 
paramedicgirl said:
The priests and laity of the SSPX are not in schism. We have discussed this ad nauseum on this forum. Give it a rest, would ya?
Click to expand...
SSPX has laity? I thought it was a PRIESTLY order?

And if the priests are not in schism, please tell me which bishop(s) they report to that is in union with the Pope 🙂

Rest not given.
 
BobCatholic said:
SSPX has laity? I thought it was a PRIESTLY order?
Click to expand...
Since they’re all “fake” trads anyway, what difference does it make? :rolleyes:

I would say they may be good candidates for rad trads as they all still recognize the Pope as the leader of the Church, more than some “obedient” Catholics who probably are not fake but real radicals. 😉

Question: how can one be left (sinister) and obedient? :hmmm:
 
BobCatholic said:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Walking_Home
Can you provide an authorative document (from Rome) that uses the terminology of “fake trads” in reference to the SSPX. Here I do not mean terms that you make up and then apply as if they come direct from the Pope’s mouth.

Sure, just find me the authoritative document (directly from the Pope) that has overturned Ecclesia Dei 🙂

Otherwise, my opinion stands.

To quote Elaine Benis :“fake, fake, fake” 🙂
Click to expand...
Did not see the term “fake trad” in Ecclesia Dei. So it comes down to you–making up fake terms—then applying them as if coming from Rome.
 
This thread will be closed if somebody doesn’t change the subject.
 
BobCatholic said:
SSPX has laity? I thought it was a PRIESTLY order?

And if the priests are not in schism, please tell me which bishop(s) they report to that is in union with the Pope 🙂

Rest not given.
Click to expand...
You must not have seen this, then:
Jean_Anthony said:
Please do not take this thread off topic by discussing, yet again, the validity of SSPX. Return to the original topic, or I will have to close the thread. Thank you.
Click to expand...
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top