S
snarflemike
Guest
Why or why not?
Well, given some things I’ve read in the past, I can imagine answers along the lines of “no, because I don’t want to have to worship an egomaniac God forever,” stuff like that. I can understand a “yes” response, but I’m curious about any “no” responses and the thinking behind them.The answer to “Why” is “Why not?”
I can understand that. I sometimes say “why?” to God.EDIT: " I don’t want the universe to be like that." (quoting from memory). Those are the responses I’m curious about.
Because the alternative is singularly unpleasant!Why or why not?
OT (this post, not yours), but have you read CS Lewis’ Space Trilogy? Much of it takes place on other, unfallen planets. Very rich food for thought.I have said to God that “if there is life on any other planets in the universe, can it please be kinder?”
Might not the pure undiluted love of God be more unpleasant for some? Or at least, might some in this life not think that to be the case?Because the alternative is singularly unpleasant!![]()
Because the alternative is singularly unpleasant!![]()
Only if there’s motorbikes!Why or why not?
One of the Devil’s oldest tricks is to try to convince us that there is another option in addition to Heaven and Hell: Annihilation. It is a tempting thought for those of us who at times grow weary of the struggle. Atheists like to proffer this alternative by saying something along the lines of, “Well, why do you find it so hard to imagine such an alternative? After all, before you were concieved you did not exist, so why is so hard to believe that you will not exist after you die?” But you see, when atheists say “you” they just mean your material parts.Why or why not?
That may depend on the understanding of the alternatives. Some Christians understand that after death the possible outcomes are heaven, taking care of the earth, or anhiliation. Some understand the possibilities to be heaven or an uneventful monotonous isolation from God. Some understand it to be heaven or eternal torture and/or burning. Some understand it to be becoming a god yourself and spirit prison and eternal torture. It may depend on what version of Christianity said non-believer is most familiar with.Well, given some things I’ve read in the past, I can imagine answers along the lines of “no, because I don’t want to have to worship an egomaniac God forever,” stuff like that. I can understand a “yes” response, but I’m curious about any “no” responses and the thinking behind them.
Hitch’s analogy is that going to heaven is the equivalent of being stuck at a party forever and being forced to have a good time.Well, given some things I’ve read in the past, I can imagine answers along the lines of “no, because I don’t want to have to worship an egomaniac God forever,” stuff like that. I can understand a “yes” response, but I’m curious about any “no” responses and the thinking behind them.
EDIT: Edward Feser quotes a philosopher as saying “I don’t want there to be a God. I don’t want the universe to be like that.” (quoting from memory). Those are the responses I’m curious about.
So what would you choose instead of heaven?That may depend on the understanding of the alternatives. Some Christians understand that after death the possible outcomes are heaven, taking care of the earth, or anhiliation. Some understand the possibilities to be heaven or an uneventful monotonous isolation from God. Some understand it to be heaven or eternal torture and/or burning. Some understand it to be becoming a god yourself and spirit prison and eternal torture. It may depend on what version of Christianity said non-believer is most familiar with.
My time limit for such parties is about 2 hours.Hitch’s analogy is that going to heaven is the equivalent of being stuck at a party forever and being forced to have a good time.