W
wisdomseeker
Guest
I am wondering about that.
What are your thoughts on this?
What are your thoughts on this?
First, not all Lutherans ordain women. We in the LCMS do not. But on the issue of those who do, I cannot see Rome ever accepting a female clergy. That’s not to say that there is not vocations available to women in the CC, there is.I am wondering about that.
What are your thoughts on this?
thanks Jon. Yesterday, I saw the holy father meeting with lutherans and there was a female bishop. It made me wonder.First, not all Lutherans ordain women. We in the LCMS do not. But on the issue of those who do, I cannot see Rome ever accepting a female clergy. That’s not to say that there is not vocations available to women in the CC, there is.
Jon
They would be received into the Church, Confirmed, and receive First Holy Communion; thereby becoming Catholic lay women. Assuming any of them would even do this in the first place…I am wondering about that.
What are your thoughts on this?
Yes, that is what i was thinking but would doubt they would do it.They would be received into the Church, Confirmed, and receive First Holy Communion; thereby becoming Catholic lay women. Assuming any of them would even do this in the first place…
As would all Lutheran men who came into the CC.They would be received into the Church, Confirmed, and receive First Holy Communion; thereby becoming Catholic lay women. Assuming any of them would even do this in the first place…
For women clergy? I doubt it.I suppose we can only speculate at this time. My bet is on women taking a lay role.
Is there any historical precedent?
The precedent for male Lutheran clergy who convert individually and become Catholic clergy is re-ordination. This, I think, is also the case of the ALCC. + Irl Gladfelter of the ALCC often posts here, so he would be the one to speak with knowledge on this. It would be speculative to say what arrangements would be made if a Lutheran synod of any significant size were to come into union with the Bishop of Rome, but my sense is that any kind of conditional ordination procedure would be unlikely. It think it is fair to say that some Lutheran clergy would object to re-ordination, as we don’t doubt the validity of ours.As would all Lutheran men who came into the CC.
The Pope did not meet with the orthodox Lutherans (Independent Evangelical - Lutheran Church (SELK-Germany) in Germany. These Lutherans do not ordain women. The Pope met with The Evangelical Church in Germany ( EKD ) which is hardly Lutheran. Its roots is with the old Prussian Union Church which was a forced union of the Lutheran Church in Prussia with the Reform ( Calvinist )Church by the King of Prussia, King Frederick William III.thanks Jon. Yesterday, I saw the holy father meeting with lutherans and there was a female bishop. It made me wonder.
Not true.The precedent for male Lutheran clergy who convert individually and become Catholic clergy is re-ordination. This, I think, is also the case of the ALCC. + Irl Gladfelter of the ALCC often posts here, so he would be the one to speak with knowledge on this. It would be speculative to say what arrangements would be made if a Lutheran synod of any significant size were to come into union with the Bishop of Rome, but my sense is that any kind of conditional ordination procedure would be unlikely. It think it is fair to say that some Lutheran clergy would object to re-ordination, as we don’t doubt the validity of ours.
Jon
From our viewpoint, it would be re-ordination. And it was that viewpoint I was expressing. Yes, obviously, from the Catholic viewpoint it would be the first ordination.Not true.
The precedent is not “re-ordination” Catholics believe that repeating the Sacrament of Orders (in the same degree) is impossible. They are not “re-ordained.” They are ordained for the first time.
I doubt very much if any of the women bishops would go along with the reunion if it involved loss of their being bishops. :dts:They would probably leave for some other Lutheran denomination that:I am wondering about that.
What are your thoughts on this?
I imagine that the Lutheran priest’s viewpoint would have to change given what it means to be a member of the Catholic clergy .From our viewpoint, it would be re-ordination. And it was that viewpoint I was expressing. Yes, obviously, from the Catholic viewpoint it would be the first ordination.
Jon
I think any such union will result in further schism among Lutherans, for the reasons you cite.I doubt very much if any of the women bishops would go along with the reunion if it involved loss of their being bishops. :dts:They would probably leave for some other Lutheran denomination that:
- Accepts women
- Does not want to reunite with Rome.
:
Because there are hundreds of thousands of holy, pure and celibate Catholc Priests who are not pedophiles.And just why would any Lutherans WANT to unite with Rome, given such current problems as Clergy child-abuse?![]()
There have been women who occupied higher offices in the Church. In their capacity they have the authority by virtue of their office but they are not ordained. If the women “bishops” do accept union with the Catholic Church, I think the conception is that they may be given the authority of an office of the Bishop, but never function liturgically as a Bishop at any time because they have to accept the fact that they never were ordained.I suppose we can only speculate at this time. My bet is on women taking a lay role.
Is there any historical precedent?