If the Eucharist is offered under both species

  • Thread starter Thread starter Flopfoot
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
F

Flopfoot

Guest
Do you just receive the body and ignore the blood?
 
Last edited:
I do not ignore the Blood of Christ.

However I do not receive it under the species of wine except on rare occasions when it is offered by intinction.
 
I also prefer receiving both. But I don’t sweat it if I can’t.
 
We receive the body of Jesus in the host, fully representing the body and blood of Jesus. No one ignores the blood of Christ. When I received my first communion it was as told by the priest the body and blood of Jesus Christ I never doubted for a moment.God bless
 
Why do they offer both at the same Mass?
If you receive the host, you’re receiving the body blood soul and divinity of Jesus Christ.
You don’t need both, one has everything.
 
As a lay person, only the Host.

As an altar server, since I’m kneeling behind Father, it depends. If he offers the Blood, I receive. If he doesn’t, no biggie.
 
At the parish I attend they offer both, but I see many people take only the host. This is probably expected, as the priest pours so little wine into the chalice that he must know not much will be needed. As he’s pouring I’ve noticed him glance up to get an idea of how many people are present. But even with a large attendance it’s just a few splashes that go into the cup.
 
Unless it’s Flu/cold season, I receive both. Nonetheless, this isn’t to mean those who don’t receive one or the other are ignoring. There’s a distinct difference between ignoring and bypassing.
 
Both? I’ve never considered the Host to be a means of transmission…
 
Both? I’ve never considered the Host to be a means of transmission…
I prefer not to take any chance on making someone else sick, if I think I’m contagious. Remember, one does not have to receive Holy Communion to be considered as having assisted at Mass.

D
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top