V
VanitasVanitatum
Guest
Immigration and climate change come to mind for me. At least I’ll support it to some degree when I’m able.
Last edited:
- Status
D
Dobby
Guest
See my above post.
Y
YourNameHere
Guest
You sound like an insurance salesperson.
J
JoeShlabotnik
Guest
The federal government is there to assist in helping Americans to find life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
Life through affordable and comprehensive health insurance.
Liberty through defensive from adversaries, both foreign and domestic.
Pursuit of happiness in an opportunity for citizens to gain food, shelter, and thing necessary to make for a good life.
Lemuel, you need not accept any help from the government. That is your choice.
America. Love it or leave it.
Life through affordable and comprehensive health insurance.
Liberty through defensive from adversaries, both foreign and domestic.
Pursuit of happiness in an opportunity for citizens to gain food, shelter, and thing necessary to make for a good life.
Lemuel, you need not accept any help from the government. That is your choice.
America. Love it or leave it.
J
JoeShlabotnik
Guest
Actually the vacation time for teachers is a bit less than six weeks, one grading period.
Sorry your educational experience has been so bad. But as they say, you get out of something what you put into it.
The easiest thing for everyone to do is to blame teachers.
Because of the inequities between states in educational standards, giving sole control to states would be a catastrophe for the students who would live in states where the government chose to put forth little in the way of funding for education.
Dan Patrick, the Lt Gov. of Texas, has been trying to lessen the amount of money spent on public education in this state since he has been in office. Fortunately, Gov. Abbott does not agree with his ultra-right wing thoughts about education!
Sorry your educational experience has been so bad. But as they say, you get out of something what you put into it.
The easiest thing for everyone to do is to blame teachers.
Because of the inequities between states in educational standards, giving sole control to states would be a catastrophe for the students who would live in states where the government chose to put forth little in the way of funding for education.
Dan Patrick, the Lt Gov. of Texas, has been trying to lessen the amount of money spent on public education in this state since he has been in office. Fortunately, Gov. Abbott does not agree with his ultra-right wing thoughts about education!
L
Lemuel
Guest
The Constitution was written to promote the general welfare, not provide.
Not to be found in the Constitution and not constitutional.
Again, our duty as a country is to promote those things, not provide them.
I love it. That’s why I’m worried. It’s like saying, love your kids or leave them. No, if my kids are screwed up, I don’t leave them. I work with them. I fight to help them purge the problems they are facing.
L
Lemuel
Guest
It’s ultra right wing to follow the Constitution?
J
JoeShlabotnik
Guest
Lemuel, you seem to have much disdain for this country. If you hate the way things are done here so much, why not just move to a country that better suits your likings?
L
Lemuel
Guest
I already answered that above.
J
JoeShlabotnik
Guest
Your interpretation of the Constitution.
L
Lemuel
Guest
Where in the Constitution is congress allowed to collect money for education?
L
Lemuel
Guest
I know. It’s nonsense to talk about the Constitution.
J
JoeShlabotnik
Guest
No, its nonsense to listen to your interpretation of the Constitution.
L
Lemuel
Guest
It’s hard to interpret something that isn’t there. Show me where in the Constitution congress is allowed to collect money for education.
J
Jeanne_S
Guest
You’re making a lot of assumptions. Firstly the all wealthy women who have abortions are Republicans.False.
Secondly,how do you know how they refer to abortion?
Seems to me the Dems own the sementics of reframing the true ugliness of abortion.They prefer to say reproductive choices ,etc.Notice how they rarely mention the word abortion
Secondly,how do you know how they refer to abortion?
Seems to me the Dems own the sementics of reframing the true ugliness of abortion.They prefer to say reproductive choices ,etc.Notice how they rarely mention the word abortion
Last edited:
P
ProdglArchitect
Guest
Even if a Democrat were pro-life, I would not vote for them. I disagree with the democratic party’s views on how best to tackle poverty, as well as their views on taxes, and other social issues. Couple that with the fact that they are not so slowly moving towards full on socialism, and no, I could never in good conscience vote for a Democrat.
O
OSN
Guest
Joeshlabotnik,
IF there was a Democrat who didn’t side with the Anti-America media, wasn’t pro-abortion, and didn’t constantly lie as do the big dems in office do. I would be more inclined to at the very least listen to what they have to say.
But if there was hypothetically speaking a pro life democrat out there, which I am sure there are ( just in hiding ), that candidate would not last long.
Democrats are notorious for eating their own. As can be currently seen with Joe Biden, he was beloved when in office with Obama, and his popularity died right after leaving office. But the swords came out once the party decided they dont want him on the ticket and all the dirt was found that could be found to destroy him. AN that was someone they liked.
The days of a balanced Democrat party are gone forever. It died with J.F.K and was on the way out the door during the hippy revolution of the 60s.
But if you want to go further back in time. Try 1776 and look at the political world from then lets say right up until 1960 on the nose. An how the Democrat party looked. You had the Federalists and Anti- Federalists that era of 1776, but the moral compass of society was well intact then. Abortion was extremely rare if unheard of in parts of the world at least as an optional choice. An was frowned upon by society not just on the woman but the man as well.
The left has constantly been trying to destroy Americas government an the country since it’s literal founding. You had loyalists to the crown back then, in the country, but the morality oddly enough was still intact back then. There were lines that were just not crossed.
Americas freedom is going to be under constant attack and the democrat party will always be leading that charge to one degree or another, an they do a great job by attacking the moral center first. and working outwards from there. But if it isn’t one party it is the other. While the Republican party is not as morally corrupt, their pig headedness, and willingness to appease democrats and be popular, make them the weakest political opponent . Only conceding to do what is morally right when the Democrats cross the line as they did with New York passing a full abortion law. An they only acted with creating a heartbeat bill, because they were not feeling as threatened with their political careers to do the right thing.
It takes constant vigilance by free citizens to keep our country free and to keep its moral conscience alive.
IF there was a Democrat who didn’t side with the Anti-America media, wasn’t pro-abortion, and didn’t constantly lie as do the big dems in office do. I would be more inclined to at the very least listen to what they have to say.
But if there was hypothetically speaking a pro life democrat out there, which I am sure there are ( just in hiding ), that candidate would not last long.
Democrats are notorious for eating their own. As can be currently seen with Joe Biden, he was beloved when in office with Obama, and his popularity died right after leaving office. But the swords came out once the party decided they dont want him on the ticket and all the dirt was found that could be found to destroy him. AN that was someone they liked.
The days of a balanced Democrat party are gone forever. It died with J.F.K and was on the way out the door during the hippy revolution of the 60s.
But if you want to go further back in time. Try 1776 and look at the political world from then lets say right up until 1960 on the nose. An how the Democrat party looked. You had the Federalists and Anti- Federalists that era of 1776, but the moral compass of society was well intact then. Abortion was extremely rare if unheard of in parts of the world at least as an optional choice. An was frowned upon by society not just on the woman but the man as well.
The left has constantly been trying to destroy Americas government an the country since it’s literal founding. You had loyalists to the crown back then, in the country, but the morality oddly enough was still intact back then. There were lines that were just not crossed.
Americas freedom is going to be under constant attack and the democrat party will always be leading that charge to one degree or another, an they do a great job by attacking the moral center first. and working outwards from there. But if it isn’t one party it is the other. While the Republican party is not as morally corrupt, their pig headedness, and willingness to appease democrats and be popular, make them the weakest political opponent . Only conceding to do what is morally right when the Democrats cross the line as they did with New York passing a full abortion law. An they only acted with creating a heartbeat bill, because they were not feeling as threatened with their political careers to do the right thing.
It takes constant vigilance by free citizens to keep our country free and to keep its moral conscience alive.
J
JoeShlabotnik
Guest
I feel the same way about a lot of the Republican agenda, like the doing away with ObamaCare. If they want to do away with it, they need to have something better to replace it with. But they do not.
P
ProdglArchitect
Guest
Why should there have to be something better in place to remove something bad? Isn’t just getting rid of “bad” inherently better?
The lack of a better alternative doesn’t mean we should sit by idly and watch as people are destroyed by the current system. Obamacare is hurting far more people than it’s helping, so we should get rid of it. We can sort out what to do afterwards.
When a person is poisoned and has cancer, you don’t wait till you can cure cancer to give them the anti-venom.
The lack of a better alternative doesn’t mean we should sit by idly and watch as people are destroyed by the current system. Obamacare is hurting far more people than it’s helping, so we should get rid of it. We can sort out what to do afterwards.
When a person is poisoned and has cancer, you don’t wait till you can cure cancer to give them the anti-venom.
J
JoeShlabotnik
Guest
Anti-American media? 
The media reports the news. But people like you apparently do not like to read the news.
Democracy is under attack, but it is under attack my dictator wannabe Donald Trump. He loves guys like Vladimir Putin and Kim Jung-Un. Why? Because they just imprison or kill people who they do not like.
The media reports the news. But people like you apparently do not like to read the news.
Democracy is under attack, but it is under attack my dictator wannabe Donald Trump. He loves guys like Vladimir Putin and Kim Jung-Un. Why? Because they just imprison or kill people who they do not like.
- Status