D
dmelosi
Guest
Why would you think that pro-lifers don’t do both?This is what i keep saying!!! But it seems single issue voters prefer legalism.
Why would you think that pro-lifers don’t do both?This is what i keep saying!!! But it seems single issue voters prefer legalism.
Until we go “grass roots”, abortion will continue to be the law of the land in the country.This is what i keep saying!!! But it seems single issue voters prefer legalism.
One side has done so, hoping the other will, then it will happen.Until we go “grass roots”, abortion will continue to be the law of the land in the country.
Real change is bottom-up. Not top-down.![]()
Some people are convinced not to try by the “it is not possible” line. Others are convinced by “our focus should be to get constitution amendment”.The best way to ensure that Roe is never reversed is the one you have chosen: claim it is not possible and don’t try.
We both want abortion to stop. We simply disagree about how one goes about doing that.Some people are convinced not to try by the “it is not possible” line. Others are convinced by “our focus should be to get constitution amendment”.
I think this misses the fact that many people identify “what’s moral” with “what’s legal”. Had the law regarding segregation not changed FIRST in the 1960s, would “cultural change” about it have been the same? Personally, I have my doubts.We both want abortion to stop. We simply disagree about how one goes about doing that.
Its a culture war and the only way you can win that war is by changing the culture…
Do you seriously think that someone just decided to change the law arbitrarily? No. There was a change in cultural attitudes (proceeding a history of cultural changes) toward segregation and there was a lot of fighting. That change was strong enough to influence the law because the law realized that segregation wasn’t going to work.I think this misses the fact that many people identify “what’s moral” with “what’s legal”. Had the law regarding segregation not changed FIRST in the 1960s, would “cultural change” about it have been the same? Personally, I have my doubts.
Why would that happen?The Supremes could turn the matter of abortion back to the states by simply observing that states govern many things, including “what’s murder” and “what isn’t” and whether people get executed or they don’t.
This is the irrefutable truth.We both want abortion to stop. We simply disagree about how one goes about doing that.
Its a culture war and the only way you can win that war is by changing the culture…
This is the irrefutable copout. There is only 1 reason not to attack from all sides. To ease one’s conscience for supporting the party that promotes the intentional killing of the most innocent.This is the irrefutable truth.![]()
No, the reason to not “attack from all sides” is that victory can only come with SCOTUS overturning itself or getting an amendment passed that bans it. Attacking in any other way is like dispatching a battalion of infantry to capture a submarine…This is the irrefutable copout. There is only 1 reason not to attack from all sides. To ease one’s conscience for supporting the party that promotes the intentional killing of the most innocent.