The Catholic Encyclopedia doesn’t seem to feel that the King James Version was terribly corrupt. It refers to only traces of prejudices.
newadvent.org/cathen/02141a.htm
I think the reason for that is that modern apologetics today is much different then is was just 10 or 15 years ago. In many ways the biggest and fastest changes have occurred in the last 5 years, CAF is one example…
My guess is that the whole Protestant issue will be put to rest inside of twenty years. If it is getting easier and easier for the “regular guy” to debunk the myths of Protestantism, what do you imagine is going to happen, as more scholars get involved? The Church will tend to “whisper” at times where lay Catholics tend to “shout”, sometimes that is good, sometimes it’s not…
Every new book that I purchase that supports and explains Catholicism is better than the last.
It wasn’t that long ago, I heard (fundamentalist, evangelical) Christian’s preaching that, Pope John Paul II was the “anti-Christ”. Now in light of historical events, a comment like that sounds ludicrous, but at the time there were millions of “Christians” in this country who bought into that non-sense.
***Who is their “anti-Christ” this week? ***
The problem with the Protestant view regarding personal interpretation is that the Protestent model as a religious system is intrinsically flawed.
It (Protestantism) is a system, that on the service “appears” to encourage study, however, because the parameters or so tight and their exist a built in “lack of incentive” to learn more about ones own Protestant faith, The Protestant model actually discourages growth and knowledge.
There is no need to learn anything else regarding Salvation once you have determined that you are “Save”, where is the incentive. There is something to be said of ‘Catholic guilt”. Guilt and fear of failure or possible disappointment can be a good thing, it can be a powerful incentive.
Most Protestants here, that are “ready” to take on Catholics, cannot even tell you if their own faith is rooted in Calvinism or Lutheranism, it is not important for them to learn that information because their own religious rule-set has made it irrelevant, they already know that they are going to heaven.
It is however, important that a Protestant learn “what’s wrong” with the Catholic Church… more time wasted “protesting”…
Protestants are rarely, if ever brought up during a Catholic Mass, and on the rare occasion that our non-Catholic
Christian brothers and sisters are mentioned, it is always positive.
The whole “protesting” mindset is also flawed. As a Catholic, I can and I am encouraged to learn as much as a can about my Catholic faith, Catholic and Christian history, tradition and the entire Bible. There is no fear that I might un-cover something that might cause me to change my faith. This isn’t true for Protestants.
Protestants are directed and misdirected to just that information which has been narrowed to support their position. Who do you thinks wins in this type of situation?
If I were to start up a business today using the “Protestant” model, it would certianly fail and so will Protestant religions.
What use to take months and years to investigate, now can take hours and days. This includes investigating the differences between the Catholic and Protestant Bibles and Catholic and Protestant doctrine.
Take care and God Bless