Donna P:
I thought this was going to be about virtues. Your poll responses where laughable. Try again and this time with discernment.
Hi Donna P,
Thank you for your helpful remarks about my poll. As a part of my discernment, Iām asking you how I could have presented this in a way thatās less laughable. Please feel free to show me how itās done.
My poll questions were intended to focus on what I perceive to be an undue emphasis on looks over faith. You see, as I said before, many if not most, of the guys I know, place a femaleās looks and body type at the very top of the selection criteria. With Catholic faithfulness and beliefs about marriage being a distant also-ran. I feel itās very shallow, even foolish to place looks and body-type at the top of the āmate-selectionā list of must-haves.
I wanted to see in both male and female respondents, what kind of mate would they pick. For example, if a typical single Catholic male were presented with two females, the first one is drop-dead gorgeous with a killer body, but having minimal to no faith and couldnāt care less about the Sacramental nature of Catholic marriage. The other female having just plain, average looks and is even a little fat, but has very strong faith and would be the ādream-wifeā in every way except looks. Which one would he choose?
Iām betting most guys will pick looks over content most of the time. Iām also betting many, but fewer, females will do the same thing, only you can substitute some of those chiseled good looks with money and status.
Iāll admit, I am a little surprised at the number of respondants, both male and female, who didnāt value looks over faith, but then this forum would probably be skewed over the general population. I am a little skeptical of those who said āI want it all.ā When it really gets down to it, I think theyāll pick looks over content most of the time.
Again, thank you for your help on this and Iām looking forward to your greatly improved, less laughable poll about virtues. It would be an honor to be one of your first respondants.