If you attend the NO mass, what is causing the lack of faith?

  • Thread starter Thread starter snowbee
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Remember, things fell apart quickly after Vatican II, so you can’t blame VII. I used to blame it all on Vatican II too, but I can no longer do that. I will say, however, having lived through those decades before and after VII, that the “spirit of Vatican II” accelerated the decomposition.
I wonder if the boom and bust of the Church in the 1960s aren’t directly related?
 
The statistics are intriguing…but, I think your are over-reaching…over-reading them!

To me is it very simple…God used Vatican II to take the “training wheels” off of Catholicism in the Western World/Cultures…He simply made us “declare …with the most sacred aspect of our free will”…what we really believed and who we really are as disciples of Our Lord Jesus…and what value (treasure) we really place on Him and our Catholic Church and Catholic Faith. Thus…with “no training wheels”…many wobbled around and finally ran off the road into a ditch…and when they got up from the ditch…instead of staying Catholic (faithfully practicing the faith)…they joined the Church of the Almighty "I"…following the “magisterium” of the Cultural Revolution…saying something akin to…"…excuse me Saint Peter…but, you are sitting in my Chair (“Ex Cathedra”)."…and even worse…"…excuse me Lord…but, you are sitting on my throne (my heart)"!

So…many faithful in the pews and many priests at the altars and many religious in the various ministries, especially the Sisters…simply did not believe in a very deep spiritual/personal/intellectual way…what the Church authoritatively taught on faith and morals (the Pope, the Bishops and/or the Magisterium) or…in her hierarchical structure. They just didn’t have…a “deep personal relationship” with Christ/His Church/Catholicism…somewhat like that personal relationship with Christ as many of our Protestant brethren like to say…our Catholic faith was more family-cultural and family-history…so when the “gates of mind and heart” were thrown open…i.e., given more (perceived personal) freedom (to choose…to be our own “magisterium”)…than we had in Pre-Vatican II Catholicism…many “bolted” and never looked back.

Lastly, just like the Lord was faithful with Moses and the Israelites wandering in the desert for forty years…I believe that He also has been very faithful with us…(1965-2005 was our 40 years in the post Vatican II desert (all the agenda contrived interpretations of what Vatican II really said)…and “our Moses”… was Pope John Paul II The Great). Now with JP-II’s death (40 years after Vatican-II…we now have our Joshua (Pope Benedict XVI) who is leading us into the “Promised Land”…(JP-II’s prophesy about the 21st Century)…the new Spring Time of Evangelization for the Church and its faithful…but before this Spring Time “resurrection” is fulfilled…the Church and each of us faithful…are going to have to make that sobering and painful journey to Calvary…and the Cross that awaits us there on that hill…just like our Master did. So, the Blood of Christ and His “Novus Ordo martyrs”…will in fact be the seed for this new Spring Time of Evangelization …"…the blood of the martyrs is the seed of the Church" .
Tertullian
(ca. 160 – ca. 220 A.D.)
The numbers you cite are accurate but simply insignificant…Our Sovereign God is always in charge and no none can stop him from doing all that He wills!
** Daniel 4: 32 (NAB)**
32 All who live on the earth are counted as nothing;** he does as he pleases** with the powers of heaven as well as with those who live on the earth.** There is no one who can stay his hand** or say to him, "What have you done?"
Pax Christi
 
That sort of underscores the point, doesn’t it? We have issues finding answers within the Church about the crisis of masculinity because…well, we’re in a crisis of masulinity. And by “we” I mean everyone.
As I’ve said for a long time, the crisis in the Church is a crisis of fatherhood. Biological and spiritual.
 
As I’ve said for a long time, the crisis in the Church is a crisis of fatherhood. Biological and spiritual.
Exactly, I agree 110%. You should check out CD’s thread in Spirituality about it, maybe we can get a good discussion going.
 
So…many faithful in the pews and many priests at the altars and many religious in the various ministries, especially the Sisters…simply did not believe in a very deep spiritual/personal/intellectual way…what the Church authoritatively taught on faith and morals (the Pope, the Bishops and/or the Magisterium) or…in her hierarchical structure. They just didn’t have…a “deep personal relationship” with Christ/His Church/Catholicism…somewhat like that personal relationship with Christ as many of our Protestant brethren like to say…our Catholic faith was more family-cultural and family-history…so when the “gates of mind and heart” were thrown open…i.e., given more (perceived personal) freedom (to choose…to be our own “magisterium”)…than we had in Pre-Vatican II Catholicism…many “bolted” and never looked back.
Perfect!

It was all in the head and not in the heart!

While it is true many bolted and never looked back, many bolted and did look back. 👍
 
There’s so many good responses in this thread. Lancer, your last post was exceptional.
 
=snowbee;6920165]If you attend the NO(novus ordo, post Vatican II mass, or the mass you usually attend, you’d know if you were attending the Tridentine, believe me) mass what do you say is causing the lack of faith?
I compiled some stats. But would like (name removed by moderator)ut since many here seem to think that it makes no difference how the liturgy is done, that it does not impact the faithful on matters of devotion to one’s Catholic faith.
1965 World Population: 3.33B
** Catholic: 654M**
2010 World Population: 6.86B
** Catholic: 1045M**
Should have been: 1347M
Which means that we had a decline in Catholicism of 22.5%. Remember, while numbers went up, we’re talking percents. This is taking out factors such as growth rate, if we factored that in, it would be more dismal.
**
1965 Clergy Population(Worldwide): 419,728
2010 Clergy Population(Worldwide): 406,411**
Based on population relative to faithful, should have been: 670,666
Which means that we had a decline in priests of 39%. Also, over 50% of our priests are over the age of 70. In 10-15 years our numbers will be cut significantly…
These figures, while rough, are worldwide. Nations are always changing, so to see if there is an actual decline, check the stats independent of an individual nation, then we can assume that the problem could be linked to something changing within the Church.
We had Vatican II, which changed the way people worshiped our Lord in the Most Holy Sacrifice of the Mass.
So, if it was not Vatican II, why the decline in the Faithful I ask to those who believe that the Novus Ordo mass is the equivalent Tridentine in terms of keeping devotion to the faith?
It is an honest question, I would like to believe that a particular way of celebrating mass would have no bearing on the devotion of Catholics, but I would like your opinion.
Regional Stats:
Pre-Vatican II belief in Real Presence: 75%
1991 belief in Real Presence: 24%
Pre-Vatican II mass attendance: 74%
As of 2001 mass attendance: 17%

They were asked if they attended mass in the past week. This means that the actual percent of people who consistently every week go is smaller as some who inconsistently go happened to go in the past week.
So, opinions?! And please, keep it OFF Topic of the liturgy, I want to hear other influences that could have caused the decline.
My dear friend in Christ; given your final directive I FEAR your looking largely were the truth AiN’T! The “proof is in the eating”.
 
My dear friend in Christ; given your final directive I FEAR your looking largely were the truth AiN’T! The “proof is in the eating”.
IDK, I think the majority of liturgical issues are symptomatic of the same issues that caused the decay. Actually they have to at best share a root cause because the major changes in the liturgy follow other indicators.
 
I’ve heard it speculated that long economic downturns lead to increased vocations, sounds cynical even to me but we will see shortly.

I lost the faith before VII however, when I tried to return some 25 years later I was struck by the, excuse the non-word but it’s what I felt at the time and coined the term to suit, protestantization of the Church. Took nearly 10 years since I first attempted a return but I finally made it back thanks in large part to a very elderly and wise Monsignor who guided through a confession and got me to communion. For the record, I attended a Catholic school and was an altar-boy so my catechism education was solid, it just never sank in I guess.
 
We are a hierarchical Church run by the ordained clergy.

There is only one group to blame.
 
If anyone is in the mood for another Scriptural reference, look at the beginning of 1st Samuel. The sons of Eli were real scoundrels. They were guilty of both liturgical and sexual abuse (is this sounding familiar at all?) I think we are waiting for this new crop of priests coming through seminary right now (who I have great hope for) to be our Samuel.
 
:rolleyes:Priests come from the laity, are formed primarily by their parent’s attitudes.
Exactly! This is precisely why I think it is so important that we at least hesitate to call certain things “great” that, at least in the context of the history of the Church, perhaps are not so great. I’m thinking especially of ecclesiastical discipline. If I raised my own children the way certain “great” parents raised theirs, I’d have a house full of spoiled brats. Kind of like what we have in the Church, eh? I’m teaching my children a different understanding of discipline and if, God be pleased, my son were to become a priest/bishop/pope, I think he would have a very different approach to these matters. Hence, the crisis of the Church being a crisis of fatherhood, biological and spiritual.
 
This is not really the case, if you read what was written about Latin education, say, a century ago. Obviously, the decline in Latin for the liturgy has made it even more pointless to learn the language, but the real shift toward the vernacular among the educated classes began in the last half of the 17th and first half of the 18th centuries, and by 1900 Latin (and Greek) education largely remained as rites of passage, because that’s “what you went to school for,” etc. You may find it of great interest to read the preface of this 1889 composition book to get a sense of what the state of things was back then.
That preface is very interesting, and should be read by all teachers, regardless of what subject they are teaching. He is right: rote learning without a context within which to put the learning always fails. But when the student can put what he is learning to use in a practical way (even if he is only translating Cicero into his copy book for his own use) then he will remember what he has learned, and incorporate it into his everyday life. 🙂
 
its been said already, but i will say it again RELATIVISM

if i could make it blink and flash different colors i would
 
So, sorry to interject any conversation that is currently going on, but I thought I’d give my two cents on this issue.

As a teenager/young adult/ whatever you want to call me (I’m 18) I’ve really experienced this. I think the reason that the faith is failing is a combination of 2 things. 1) That CCD teachers aren’t prepared enough to teach the faith to youngsters. I know more about the Church and the Bible at my age than any of the teachers, grade coordinators or heads of the religious ed department do.
  1. Parents aren’t making their Catholic faith central to their home lives. I think this has to do with the misunderstanding of Vatican II and the Social revolution of the 60’s. That has warped peoples views of morality and therefore warped what they are passing on to their children. Its quite a sad scenario that we live in.
 
Many valid reasons have been given in this thread. I suggest you consult the World Christian Encyclopedia en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Christian_Encyclopedia , and World Christian Database worldchristiandatabase.org/wcd/ to check the growth of non-Catholic denominations during the same time frame. There has been an explosion in non-Catholic and non-Christian sects, all of which target the Catholic Church for members.

Consider that the Catholic Church has the most stringent moral teachings, during a period in history when world moral behavior is rapidly declining. I would imagine that a major decline occurred in the post-World War II period, as troubling social demographics seem to follow involvement in war. Two other wars quickly ensued after WWII, both greatly affecting the American Church.

To blame it on the NO mass is a cop out. I have never attended a Tridentine mass, and firmly believe that, if one is even moderately well catechized, is seeking a depth of faith, and is aware of what is occurring at the mass, its exact form is not important.

On the grand scale of things, this is the work of the evil one. Consider how so many nations around the world, in a relatively short time, have embraced contraception and are now embracing abortion, and are considering euthanasia and institutionalized homosexuality. None of these practices was ever a major factor in world culture until very recently. With the extremely varied cultures and societies involved, how is one to explain this phenomenon? There is a larger plan at work, and it seeks to draw members away from the Church, and to involve those members (and even non-members) in what is objectively mortal sin. Beside God, who else has always had a desire for souls?

Essentially, the evil one has perpetrated a “perfect storm” against God, with the Church standing at the forefront of the fight. Among all of the other factors, notice that the world is now promoting homosexuality and its teaching to children as a “normal, alternative lifestyle”, but condemns the Catholic Church when homosexual Priests exhibit that exact behavior!
I think that a universal Latin mass would be even more severely attacked by the world, since so few people comprehend Latin. The use of Latin would stand as evidence to the world that the Church was “out of touch”, “irrelevant”, “Patriarchal”, “sexist” or worse. Notice that those criticisms are occurring even with the Novus Ordo!

Christ’s peace be with you.
You took the words out of my mind! It’s exactly what I thought and I couldn’t agree more with you on youre entire statment.
 
My 2 cents on this:
Being that I am only 25 I didn’t experience anything from the 80’s and below, but I do remember the 90’s and on. CCD classes most of them were a joke! They “thought” you how to pray and maybe read scripture, but they never helped you to understand the meaning of it. The people who thought CCD at my parish where not well prepared, if anything (I still see it now) are only volunteers who they themselves suffer from poor faith. I remember hearing in CCD “well I believe that women should be allowed to be priest”, “you can only receive communion on the hand”, “no one really goes to hell because God loves you no matter what”, and my favorite was from confirmation “I don’t need to confess my sins to a man, I go directly to God”. These are some of the “opinions” some of these “teachers” would share with their students. So add this with relativism and you get recipe for destruction of the Faith.

Now another problem I’ve seen is with family. Many parents get upset at the idea of their children ever entering a vocation in religious life. They dread the idea and become upset if a catechizes teacher even plants the idea into their heads. These parents are the same people who expect the Church to teach their kids everything about the Church in a short time, but they themselves refuse to uphold those teachings in their own households, thus causing confusion and contradictions in the minds of the children.

Now, when we turn to the world, over the past 40 if not more years, we have seen Christian countries like Spain, France, and Portugal fall to the secularist ideology. Just recently Kenya has approved abortion in their country. African countries are quickly growing in Christian Faith, but the West will not allow for that, and have already influenced them with their “religion”. Now Mexico, one of the countries with great devotion to our Lady, is greatly considering to legalize “gay-marriage”.

So, with all these thing occurring, does anyone really think that God is going to keep allowing these blasphemous laws and beliefs to keep infecting this world? I can’t speak for the Lord, but the Bible especially the Old testament has shown us what has happen to those who make themselves “god”.
 
Lack of faith or lack of heart. I can only tell you what caused me to leave and many of my relatives. I know a lot of people who say they went to Catholic schools and had some very stern and not nice nuns. What is attractive about that? Even Fr. Corapi says you have to preach the truth “in love

Sometimes people get so into their own world and what they want and know…which is fine but they forget some of the big commandments like “love thy neighbor”…Unfortunately my grandmother was very much like that….which is part of the reason I left the Church 20+ years ago. She was worried about all that stuff…didn’t like the holding of the hands…and yet here was her granddaughter who was receiving communion and had never been to confession, had never been confirmed, who didn’t have the slightest idea why we did the things that we did. Seems to me to be missing the whole picture and point. I always wondered where the “loving thy neighbor” part comes in? So, first chance I got…I hightailed it away…got baptized in a Protestant church where I could find a loving God and people…not just the God with the thunder and lightening bolts.

I came back because of a loving priest…

Why are there less priest? Let’s see…you have people on one side critizing every mood and wanting things to be more traditional…and you have people on the other side mad because they get called out for leaving after communion. Seems like you can’t win:shrug: Also doesn’t look all that attractive…if you wanted to serve God you could go to religious life and not work in a parish.
 
:rolleyes:Priests come from the laity, are formed primarily by their parent’s attitudes.
Yes, but Priests decide who goes to seminary, Priests and Bishops decide how seminaries are run. They decide what is taught.

Bishops ordain priests. Bishops and Cardinals approve the liturgy. Pastors run parishes - they are ultimately responsible for the people in their geographical area.

There are many good Priests. But, in my diocese alone in the last 20 or so years there have been sex scandals, multiple instances of embezzlement, poor planning, and lowering attendance.

The Pastor is responsible for the people in his geographic area. If they no longer believe, it’s his fault. If the Religious Education program isn’t working because the volunteers are submarining him, it’s his fault. If people are not reverent in Mass or dress in flip flops and shorts, it’s his problem.

The lay people can not solve these problems. We need to pray for our Priests and Bishops, that they will address these problems.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top