P
PRmerger
Guest
Yet when the Holy Spirit inspires someone to say that Jesus is Lord, what else could it mean but that Jesus is God?Ya I know that. My point is that the word Lord has more meanings than just God.
Yet when the Holy Spirit inspires someone to say that Jesus is Lord, what else could it mean but that Jesus is God?Ya I know that. My point is that the word Lord has more meanings than just God.
In my opinion, it is really irrrelevant whether Elizabeth knew conceptually that she was declaring Jesus to be God or not. She said it at the prompting of the Holy Spirit, and clearly, no Christian ought to be thinking that the HS would declare anything other than Jesus is God.As for the Holy Spirit’s inspiration - absolutely.
Irrelevant? No, because a handful of people on this thread are making whether or not Elizabeth or Mary knew that the child was God the ENTIRE issue. They have employed some very rudimentary linguistic “evidence” (only in the Greek, mind you) that is pretty irrelevant.
Oh, yes, indeed. There’s a lot of Scriptural acrobatics going on, as well as theological gyrations. All in order to deny that the CC, when it says that Mary is the Mother of God is simply proclaiming that Jesus is God.Therefore, I believe it was necessary to employ the passge from Isaiah to finally prove that what they were doing was nothing short of Scriptural acrobatics - and not very good ones at that.
You must mean “suspended”. That’s a temporary banning. Being “banned” means you are allowed to post on the CAFS: never.I’ve been ‘banned’ twice.
But the question is did Elizabeth know that Jesus is also God?Yet when the Holy Spirit inspires someone to say that Jesus is Lord, what else could it mean but that Jesus is God?
So what? When the Holy Spirit inspires you to say something it is the Word of God, no?So to say Elizabeth knew Mary was carrying God is pretty doubtful.
If its irrelevant then why all the, yes she did, arguement on your side?So what? When the Holy Spirit inspires you to say something it is the Word of God, no?
Mary was the Mother of HER LORD. Period.
Scripture states that Elizabeth called Mary the Mother of God.
[SIGN]The Scriptures have her proclaiming that Mary is the Mother of God. [/SIGN]
Whether she knew it or not is irrelevant.
I really don’t know.If its irrelevant then why all the, yes she did, arguement on your side?
Seems to me its pretty relevant to you.
Yes we can agree that the word Lord means God, but you know how I feel after that.I really don’t know.
As far as the Scriptures, they proclaim that Elizabeth declared Mary to be the Mother of God!
Nothing more needs to be said.
She said this under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, so there is no doubt that “Lord” here means “Jesus is God.”
Are we agreed on this?
Now you’re being a bit coy.Yes we can agree that the word Lord means God, but you know how I feel after that.
YesNow you’re being a bit coy.
Are we agreed that the Scriptures say that Mary is the Mother of God?
She might know. If she did not, the Holy Spirit spoke in and through her to proclaim the truth that we believe today.But the question is did Elizabeth know that Jesus is also God?
The importance of the word Messiah is not what it is but what it entails to the believers who believe in the coming of the Messiah. The Jews knew what the Messiah would do to their nation. The Christians believe that the Messiah is not just a man and that his kingdom is not on this earth.Now as you know the word Messiah is a term used in Judaism which means anointed. Messiah is used in the Hebrew Bible to describe Priests or Kings who were traditionally anointed with holy anointing oil.
Example: Cyrus the Great, the King of Persia, although not a Hebrew. is referred to as God anointed (messiah). Now later in Jewish messianic tradition and eschatology, messiah refers to a leader anointed by God.
The translation of the Hebrew word masiah as khristos in Greek Seotuagint became the accepted Christian designation and title of Jesus of Nazareth.
You are correct on your first part here.She might know. If she did not, the Holy Spirit spoke in and through her to proclaim the truth that we believe today.
The importance of the word Messiah is not what it is but what it entails to the believers who believe in the coming of the Messiah. The Jews knew what the Messiah would do to their nation. The Christians believe that the Messiah is not just a man and that his kingdom is not on this earth.
That’s how we should understand what Elizabeth was doing. Revelation came from her exclamation by the Holy Spirit.
:tiphat:
Much of the revelation in the Gospels took a progressive trend that culminated in the belief that we have today. It is until nearly the last chapters that we (or the disciples) know that Jesus would be crucified and resurrected.You are correct on your first part here.
Now when Mary was pregnant with Jesus, there was no so called Christians and Mary was of the Jewish faith. Now most of the people who followed Christ thought he was some political leader, even some of his disciples thought that as well. Some not all the Christians also believed that Jesus was just a man, they believed he was a leader and his kingdom was here in earth not in heaven. Now today we believe that the Messiah is not just a man but God and that his kingdom is not here on earth but in heaven.
It is believed by some that Jesus returned in 70AD:shrug:The Holy Spirit, being God, knew who Jesus was. As I just pointed out in a post, the Holy Spirit inspires people to say things and they don’t understand exactly what they are saying. Example: reading from the epistles, it seems Paul thought Jesus was going to return soon. Paul wrote about ‘end times’ stuff and didn’t understand when that would happen.
*Context, my dear fellow, context!Ya I know that. My point is that the word Lord has more meanings than just God.
*Thank goodness you were not one of the translators of the New Testament Dokimas!I’d say yes; that’s why I don’t think Elizabeth was calling Jesus God when she called Him Lord.
Today we have the benefit of having the Bible in whole. We know the conclusion of what is not known by the speakers of the words that were inspired by the Holy Spirit. It is not the wrong understanding or the ignorance of the words uttered by the person that was inspired by the Holy Spirit but what the Holy Spirit wanted to convey that matters – because that’s the proclamation of the truth regardless of the knowledge of the person uttering the words.The Holy Spirit, being God, knew who Jesus was. As I just pointed out in a post, the Holy Spirit inspires people to say things and they don’t understand exactly what they are saying. Example: reading from the epistles, it seems Paul thought Jesus was going to return soon. Paul wrote about ‘end times’ stuff and didn’t understand when that would happen.
*You say you were never Catholic and yet you can disagree with Catholics about what we state the CC teaches!I don’t try to disagree with the CC. That’s not my goal in life. I read and think for myself and sometimes I disagree with what you guys say the CC teaches. I think it’s as simple as that. BTW, I was never catholic.
:tiphat:
You are way ahead of the average Joe-Catholic-in-the-pew who has not a whit of idea why Catholics call Mary the Mother of God.
I suspect that part of the reason you are here is that God has a plan for you to witness to these lumpy-pew fillers.
Oh, how I wish I could hear you say to one of these Catholics, “Oh, yes, sir, your church does indeed teach that. You should be ashamed that I, a non-Catholic, know your faith better than you.”