blackforest
Well-known member
You are correct. The link I posted above did account for robbery as it weighed violent crimes. Thanks for pointing that out. Here is the link again.
Robbery and other property crimes have an effect beyond mere stealing of material possessions. The sense of being violated is very human, and affects the victims directly. The trauma of that is a form of emotional and psychological violence against the person. Violence isn’t limited to physical injury – victims are injured on several levels of their being. Our lawmakers should take that into account when determining the degree of culpability for people committing these crimes.blackforest:
Let me interject here so that you can understand the logic of including robbery with violent crimes, as most states do. The crime against property has other names; larceny, theft, burglary. Larceny, or theft is the only true crime against property. Burglary is a hybrid, as while it may be just against property it might involve the risk of physical harm. Here, Burglary of a vehicle is a misdemeanor; of a building, it is a low felony; of a habitation, it is a serious felony. The close the crime gets to hurting people, the more serious it is.Robbery is a crime against property, not bodies.
Robbery, on the other hand, can only be charged when done directly against a person. It must involve either injury to the other person, or deadly threats. That is the element that makes it a violent crime. It is possible that some states have a different definition that might make it possible without violence, but I would not know that.
As a group. the New England states Maine, New Hampshire, Vermont, Connecticut and Rhode island are near the bottom of the list, being the most safe states in America. Provided you are OK with the New England weather, (which can be severe), your best bet for safety is to move to a New England state.. Here is the link again.
Assuming you want more land. If we’re talking about people who move when they retire, the last thing a lot of them want is a lot of land to maintain. My dad always says when he retires they’re going to sell the house and buy a condo somewhere within walking distance of stores, restaurants, etc. At some point you zero desire to go mow a huge lawn or shovel a driveway.Well, a big one, is that states in the midwest and southeast tend to be much less expensive, and you get more land for less money. Seems like a win to me.
Some years we do not get snow, or only flurries at the airport or out in the country. Agreed, there is something missing in those years.Anne1964:
I’ve always wondered what it’d be like to live in an area that doesn’t get snow. I don’t think I’d like it. Something would be missing.Cold climate with snow
So you could never live in a red state because it’s differs from your views but you love diversity?I could never live in a solidly red area. I could live in a deep blue area of a red state, though, I suppose.
I love diversity and I am liberal and progressive.
Absolutely right. And a large snowfall is an ideal time to get a little exercise and make money by shoveling people’s sidewalks and driveways.I’ve always wondered what it’d be like to live in an area that doesn’t get snow. I don’t think I’d like it. Something would be missing.
To be fair, he/she said they didn’t want to live in a solidly red state, presumably meaning a place that was overwhelmingly conservative. That’s not the same thing as saying they want to live in a place where there are no conservatives (which doesn’t exist anyway.)So you could never live in a red state because it’s differs from your views but you love diversity?
Fair point. I guess I’m thinking more about the cultural element and the overall “vibe”, which is I think more about urban/suburban/rural than about which way the state as a whole votes in presidential elections.True, but I do think there’s an overall “feel” to some states. Not to mention laws can be rather different by red vs blue. I homeschool and will always prefer a red state for that reason. The laws are remarkably less strict in red states and I enjoy that freedom when structuring my kids’ curriculum.
Utah is wonderful. It would be probably the only state I would strike for religious reasons though. The whole separation of Church and State doesn’t seem to apply there with the LDS as powerful as they are. That’s okay I guess, if one is a Mormon.I lived in Utah for a while, it sounds like it would hit most of your list.