Maybe you did not get my point. Why are you comparing Felix Manalo and John. Surely, they come up with different lifestyle.
What they have in common is God appointed them to do baptism, that’s it.
Manalo was exempted from baptism same with John. Don’t compare each one of them, because they are not the same.
The difference NEW ERA, is that though we cannot read that John was literally baptized with water JOHN’S AUTHORITY WAS RECOGNIZED BY CHRIST WHILE MANALO WAS NOT.
MATTHEW 3:14-15
14 But John forbad him, saying, I have need to be baptized of thee, and comest thou to me?
**15 And Jesus answering said unto him, Suffer it to be so now: for thus it becometh us to fulfil all righteousness. Then he suffered him. **
The Church says the term “Church of Christ” is the name of the Church in the Bible correct? That is what they taught me. The Iglesia Ni Cristo uses plenty of lies about other churches and claims they are that churches teachings; I will avoid such things. If that site is false in saying that the INC believes that saying “Church of Christ” in the Bible proves (along with some other doctrine) they are the true church then tell me if that is wrong. It is wrong to makeup a church belief so you can disprove it and I am sorry if this is a made up belief. But I remember during lessons and during worship services that is one of the “proofs” they used.letusreason.org/Iglesia3.htm …why you point me to this link? … this is not an INC website… the one who write this link are those who criticize the INC Doctrines , surely they are telling their own interpretation.
28 Take heed therefore to yourselves and to all the flock, over which the Holy Spirit has appointed you overseers, to feed the church of Christ which he has purchased with his blood.
You know what’s funny? You surely don’t realize you are violating an INC memorandum. You said, “we” do you have a direct connection with the INC hierarchy? What is your locale?Hahahaha… funny guy … we are waiting for somebody to have a formal debate… and now you are saying that many Catholics knocking infront of INC central to ask for a debate. bwahahahahahahahahahahaha…
Maybe perhaps you can help and explain more about it because it came directly from an INC minister. i82.photobucket.com/albums/j253/inahsworld101/2-1.gifMaybe you just heard it, and not understand what it is all about.
Originally Posted by mongladz forums.catholic-questions.org/images/buttons_cad/viewpost.gif
*Everyone seems to have his own question . I think I should as well.
newera, your ministers explains the sealing as membership to iglesia. My question; What is wrong with your angel’s arithmetic?i82.photobucket.com/albums/j253/inahsworld101/th_n.gif*
In Revelation those who would be sealed are a 144,000 when in 1980 the INC membership is already a million (1997 Britannica). Strange i82.photobucket.com/albums/j253/inahsworld101/u.gif.
More profit?
If we take you seriously, Paul must also be teaching something different, since he advocated celibacy and was himself celibate. Jesus Himself was celibate as well. What was Paul’s point then? His point was that there’s a sect who teaches or taught that all its members must not marry, a charge that does not fit the Catholic Church in any way.I 'm not saying that Catholic church forbid everyone…but the doctrine of forbidden to marry was found in catholic church specially on the priest after ordination.
Your right… baptism is the initiation during our Christ era. But it was not implemented during Moses and Elijah…
Even praising God during Moses is different than Christian era.
Does not answer my point: are we or are we not in the Christian era then?Now for Manalo’s time he was called by God to one’s more to regroup God son’s and daugther in these last days.
Why is he exempted again? Is he a prophet? Only the INC thinks so. Do other denominations accept him? No. So what’s the basis of your claim, other than his own family saying, “We said so”?God already appointed him to baptize everyone… he doesnt go through baptism anymore. Same with John the Baptis… he was appointed to baptized our Lord Jesus Christ.
what about your religion? did you give credit to the four angels?newera,
Can I add questions? Why don’t you guys give credit to the other four angels as well? They are biblical figures right, why exalt only Manalo?
i82.photobucket.com/albums/j253/inahsworld101/o.gifI know! Is it because the four; Thomas Woodrow Wilson a presbyterian, David Lloyd George a baptist, Georges Clemenceau a protestant and Vittorio Emanuele Orlando a Catholic were never converted to INC? i82.photobucket.com/albums/j253/inahsworld101/n.gif
Why is he exempted? If God appointed you to be his nation’s leader… who do you think has the right to baptize him??If we take you seriously, Paul must also be teaching something different, since he advocated celibacy and was himself celibate. Jesus Himself was celibate as well. What was Paul’s point then? His point was that there’s a sect who teaches or taught that all its members must not marry, a charge that does not fit the Catholic Church in any way.
Does not answer my point: are we or are we not in the Christian era then?
Why is he exempted again? Is he a prophet? Only the INC thinks so. Do other denominations accept him? No. So what’s the basis of your claim, other than his own family saying, “We said so”?
His point was that there’s a sect who teaches or taught that all its members must not marry, – what verse in the bible is this??If we take you seriously, Paul must also be teaching something different, since he advocated celibacy and was himself celibate. Jesus Himself was celibate as well. What was Paul’s point then? His point was that there’s a sect who teaches or taught that all its members must not marry, a charge that does not fit the Catholic Church in any way.
Does not answer my point: are we or are we not in the Christian era then?
Why is he exempted again? Is he a prophet? Only the INC thinks so. Do other denominations accept him? No. So what’s the basis of your claim, other than his own family saying, “We said so”?
Again, yes you heard it…but not what it means … we don’t teach that… maybe it’s not the INC … maybe Latter Day Saints (Jehovah’s witnesses)Maybe perhaps you can help and explain more about it because it came directly from an INC minister. i82.photobucket.com/albums/j253/inahsworld101/2-1.gif
Here it is again:
newera;1728771:
JOHN’S AUTHORITY WAS RECOGNIZED BY CHRIST WHILE MANALO WAS NOT.Maybe you did not get my point. Why are you comparing Felix Manalo and John. Surely, they come up with different lifestyle.
What they have in common is God appointed them to do baptism, that’s it.
Manalo was exempted from baptism same with John. Don’t compare each one of them, because they are not the same.
The difference NEW ERA, is that though we cannot read that John was literally baptized with water JOHN’S AUTHORITY WAS RECOGNIZED BY CHRIST WHILE MANALO WAS NOT.
MATTHEW 3:14-15
14 But John forbad him, saying, I have need to be baptized of thee, and comest thou to me?
**15 And Jesus answering said unto him, Suffer it to be so now: for thus it becometh us to fulfil all righteousness. Then he suffered him. **
Well, that’s your opinion. I respect you.
Its better to watch what he did…
Yes… we are in Christian era…same with John, who baptise John?If we take you seriously, Paul must also be teaching something different, since he advocated celibacy and was himself celibate. Jesus Himself was celibate as well. What was Paul’s point then? His point was that there’s a sect who teaches or taught that all its members must not marry, a charge that does not fit the Catholic Church in any way.
Does not answer my point: are we or are we not in the Christian era then?
Why is he exempted again? Is he a prophet? Only the INC thinks so. Do other denominations accept him? No. So what’s the basis of your claim, other than his own family saying, “We said so”?
hahahahaha… you cannot find Felix Manalo in the bible…you really need to read the bible more. kawawa ka naman… inusinte sa bible.Yes John and Ka Felix aren’t the same. John was indeed apponted by God to call men to repentance and baptize them with water as recorded in the Gospels, but we can’t seem to find Felix Manalo’s name anywhere in the New Testament as being commanded by God to do the same thing, baptize.
well even if I say many or even one… or whatsover… the point is… your lying bwhahahahaha.You know what’s funny? You surely don’t realize you are violating an INC memorandum. You said, “we” do you have a direct connection with the INC hierarchy? What is your locale?
And please, before you say haha and haha read properly. I said, “even one knockin…” not many. Hmmm… misquote, very familiar. i82.photobucket.com/albums/j253/inahsworld101/heehee.gif
We give credit to what is due, want a sample?what about your religion? did you give credit to the four angels?
Neat! It was surely an INC minister trying to indoctrinate us and you seem to know that he isn’t. You do bilocation?i82.photobucket.com/albums/j253/inahsworld101/th_n.gifAgain, yes you heard it…but not what it means … we don’t teach that… maybe it’s not the INC … maybe Latter Day Saints (Jehovah’s witnesses)
I am lying, that’s good how did you know? Are you an angel as well? Perhaps you can ask Minister Bienvenido Santiago and Minister Samuel Paran of the INC central. Oh yes bring a glass of water with you. i82.photobucket.com/albums/j253/inahsworld101/th_heehee.gifwell even if I say many or even one… or whatsover… the point is… your lying bwhahahahaha.