Illegal Immigration

  • Thread starter Thread starter melekali
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Here is a quote from Lumen Gentium: "In matters of faith and morals, the bishops speak in the name of Christ and the faithful are to accept their teaching and adhere to it with a religious assent. "
The determination of the best means of resolving immigration problems is not a matter of faith or morals. Lumen Gentium simply does not apply to this topic; this is a political issue. Beyond this, Mahony is not my bishop so his words do not apply to me. My bishop has made no such comment.

Ender
 
Hello rev kevin;

People who have wants in the way you describe, often find devious ways to make it happen, they can also use force- does that make it morally right?

Not in the way you suggest, but if you were homeless and destitute, then maybe?

Here are a few passages that talk about how to treat aliens, or in today’s language, refugees, immigrants.

Leviticus 19
33 " 'When an alien lives with you in your land, do not mistreat him. 34 The alien living with you must be treated as one of your native-born. Love him as yourself, for you were aliens in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

Leviticus 24
You are to have the same law for the alien and the native-born. I am the LORD your God.

Exodus 22:21
"Do not mistreat an alien or oppress him, for you were aliens in Egypt.

Leviticus 19:10
Do not go over your vineyard a second time or pick up the grapes that have fallen. Leave them for the poor and the alien. I am the LORD your God.

Exodus 12:49
The same law applies to the native-born and to the alien living among you."
No one here is advocating for the mistreatment of illegal aliens. Requiring them to go through a process to legally become a citizen is not mistreatment. I don’t know where people got it into their heads that it is an absolute moral right of anyone to break the law and then become entitled to whatever they want after that.

Requiring people to follow the law is not mistreatment or immoral.

In Christ,
Rand
 
I am saddened by this thread

The history of America is built on immigration, and they have made the native American Indians a second class citizen.

Americans plundered Africa for slaves, and brought them to America.

America’s policy in Iraq has caused over two million refugees from that country.

America interferes in many other countries thinking they have the right to be the global police force

I do not believe American policy is built on fairness to weaker countries.
Eric, this country was built on LEGAL immigration not ILLEGAL immigration. I myself am an immigrant. My father went through all the proper procedures, and adhered to the rules required for us to be granted permission to enter this country. No one on this thread is against immigration. It’s the ILLEGAL kind we oppose. READ POST # 10 for a better insight as to why illegal immigration is a serious problem.
 
ALL land belongs to God. Then I want to build a house on your property, OPS I mean on Gods land that you are inhabiting. Now once I do that I want you to pay for my medical along with my families, my education along with my families, my food, I want you to speak my laungage (lets say it Polish) but I won’t learn yours, I don’t want you to ask me if I belong on your property because it would be profiling. I don’t want you to kick me off the property because I have children that were born on your property and I want to keep us all together as a family. I want signs put in both languages mine and yours, I want business to speak my language so I can do business with them and I want you to make me a part of your family with all the inheritance’s, privilages that come out of being a part of your family because I think you owe me that.
Would you be willing to do all that?
rev Kevin, I LOVE YOUR POST! Either Eric hasn’t seen it, or he simply chooses to ignore it. No one, absolutely no one has a leg to stand on after reading what you wrote if they oppose our postion.
 
I am saddened by this threadThe history of America is built on immigration,
Legal immigration
and they have made the native American Indians a second class citizen.
Could you define 2nd class citizen?
Americans plundered Africa for slaves, and brought them to America
It was Africans who plundered Africans and sold them to Americans. Most Americans slave owners treat their slaves well (as prescribed in the Bible). Many, many Americans were against the slave trade and finally shut it down.
America’s policy in Iraq has caused over two million refugees from that country.
No, it was Iraqi policy against its own citizens that caused this immigration.
America interferes in many other countries thinking they have the right to be the global police force
America doesn’t believe in sitting back and letting countries destroy their own people, throw acid in women’s faces, keep women from going to school, stone women for being raped, or who think it’s okay to hijack jets to kill innocent civilians.
I do not believe American policy is built on fairness to weaker countries.
America gives more food and funding to third world countries than any other country in the world.

I’m proud of America and I’m proud to be an American by choice. So is the rest of my family.
 
The determination of the best means of resolving immigration problems is not a matter of faith or morals. Lumen Gentium simply does not apply to this topic; this is a political issue. Beyond this, Mahony is not my bishop so his words do not apply to me. My bishop has made no such comment.

Ender
Unfortunately, Cardinal Mahony has spoken of a mandate from God. My assumption is that a mandate from God does concern Catholic faith and respecting the mandate from God does concern Catholic morals. So, based on what Cardinal Mahony says, I don’t see how this does not involve faith and morals.
Further, we have seen quoted passages from the Holy Scripture concerning the treatment of aliens. If Holy Scripture mandates how we are to treat aliens, then it is another reason why this is a matter of faith and morals.

Leviticus 19
33 " 'When an alien lives with you in your land, do not mistreat him. 34 The alien living with you must be treated as one of your native-born. Love him as yourself, for you were aliens in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

Leviticus 24
You are to have the same law for the alien and the native-born. I am the LORD your God.

Exodus 22:21
"Do not mistreat an alien or oppress him, for you were aliens in Egypt.

Leviticus 19:10
Do not go over your vineyard a second time or pick up the grapes that have fallen. Leave them for the poor and the alien. I am the LORD your God.

Exodus 12:49
The same law applies to the native-born and to the alien living among you."
 
Hello rev kevin;

People who have wants in the way you describe, often find devious ways to make it happen, they can also use force- does that make it morally right?

Not in the way you suggest, but if you were homeless and destitute, then maybe?

Here are a few passages that talk about how to treat aliens, or in today’s language, refugees, immigrants.

Leviticus 19
33 " 'When an alien lives with you in your land, do not mistreat him. 34 The alien living with you must be treated as one of your native-born. Love him as yourself, for you were aliens in Egypt. I am the LORD your God.

Leviticus 24
You are to have the same law for the alien and the native-born. I am the LORD your God.

Exodus 22:21
"Do not mistreat an alien or oppress him, for you were aliens in Egypt.

Leviticus 19:10
Do not go over your vineyard a second time or pick up the grapes that have fallen. Leave them for the poor and the alien. I am the LORD your God.

Exodus 12:49
The same law applies to the native-born and to the alien living among you."
I guess you missed my point.
My point is that is what they, the illegal aliens, are doing and demanding from the U.S. citizens and government. That is what makes most people mad. We don’t have a problem with legal immigration if it is done according to the law. But they want to go around the law and do it their own way, saying we want to be citizens but on our terms and in our way not yours.

I like that, Then maybe.
Have you done it for the homeless and destitute?
Do you do anything for the homeless and destitute?
If a homeless family came to you and needed a place to stay would you offer a room in your house, would you rent them a hotel room for the night or would you do nothing?
I know what I would do because we were homeless and know what it feels like to be treated like your lower than dirt and shunned by people who say they would do anything to help but when asked don’t.

Every country has laws that all are to go by. For one they broke the law by sneeking into this country or they over stayed their visa’s. I think we are treating them very well by giving them social services, medical, housing, having signs in their language, offering them ESL classes. giving them a free education, food stamps, and allowing them to stay as long as they have. You say that the same law applies to the native-born and aliens living among you. Well they don’t see it that way, if they did they would not have come into this country illegally. In some states they can get a DL, pretty fair. They use other peoples SSN which is Identy Thieft and against the law, but they get away with it when we couldn’t. In some states you can’t ask them to prove they are here legally because thats against their civil rights and considered racial profiling. They go to the ER’s and don’t pay for it, you can’t sue them because they give no good SSN, a fake ID, and fake addresses so they get away with it but we would be sued for it. And the list goes on…So who’s mistreating who? I believe this covers all the Scripture you quoted.
You may call them refugees or immagrints to be politically correct but I’m not a politically correct person. They are not immigrants they are, to be nice, illegal immigrants, big difference between the 2 that many seem to avoid or seem to be confuse about. Refugees are a whole different story.
 
America doesn’t believe in sitting back and letting countries destroy their own people, throw acid in women’s faces, keep women from going to school, stone women for being raped, or who think it’s okay to hijack jets to kill innocent civilians.
.
Does America believe in rendition, kidnapping and torturing innocent people in foreign countries?
 
Legal immigration Could you define 2nd class citizen?
It was Africans who plundered Africans and sold them to Americans. Most Americans slave owners treat their slaves well (as prescribed in the Bible). Many, many Americans were against the slave trade and finally shut it down. No, it was Iraqi policy against its own citizens that caused this immigration. America doesn’t believe in sitting back and letting countries destroy their own people, throw acid in women’s faces, keep women from going to school, stone women for being raped, or who think it’s okay to hijack jets to kill innocent civilians.
America gives more food and funding to third world countries than any other country in the world.

I’m proud of America and I’m proud to be an American by choice. So is the rest of my family.
Ya know according to history the first slave owner in America was a black man. At least it was according to the history channel.

I give your post 👍👍👍 3 thumbs up
 
Eric, this country was built on LEGAL immigration not ILLEGAL immigration. .
Did Christopher Columbus and other white Europeans immigrate legally and ask the American Indian for permission to live in the USA, or did they simply go around murdering and slaughtering any American Indian who objected to their ruthless explotation of American land?
 
Does America believe in rendition, kidnapping and torturing innocent people in foreign countries?
“Rendition” or “Extraordinary Rendition?” Big difference between the 2.
Kidnapping, define kidnapping and under what type of circumstances?
Toturing of innocent people. Define toture.

Now if you ask:
Do we believe in throwing acid in womens faces? NO.
Do we believe in killing innocent people because they disagree with the president? NO
Do we believe in a dictator? NO
Do we believe in stoning people? NO
Do we believe in hijack planes and fly them into buildings killing thousands of innocent people? NO
Do we believe in toruring our citizens because they said something we don’t agree with? NO.
Do we believe in stoning or killing people because they are gay? NO
Do we believe in cutting off the hands of someone who stold? NO.
Do we believe in Sharia law? NO.
I could name more.
 
Hello sidbrown;
Did Christopher Columbus and other white Europeans immigrate legally and ask the American Indian for permission to live in the USA, or did they simply go around murdering and slaughtering any American Indian who objected to their ruthless explotation of American land?
I can imagine centuries ago Indians were complaining about illegal settlers taking their jobs, their land, their food supply. I can imagine that the Indians had very little say, when it came to setting the law of the land.

Blessings

Eric
 
“Rendition” or “Extraordinary Rendition?” Big difference between the 2.
Kidnapping, define kidnapping and under what type of circumstances?
Toturing of innocent people. Define toture.

Now if you ask:
Do we believe in throwing acid in womens faces? NO.
Do we believe in killing innocent people because they disagree with the president? NO
Do we believe in a dictator? NO
Do we believe in stoning people? NO
Do we believe in hijack planes and fly them into buildings killing thousands of innocent people? NO
Do we believe in toruring our citizens because they said something we don’t agree with? NO.
Do we believe in stoning or killing people because they are gay? NO
Do we believe in cutting off the hands of someone who stold? NO.
Do we believe in Sharia law? NO.
I could name more.
Please see:
aclu.org/human-rights_national-security/statement-khaled-el-masri
 
Hello rev kevin;
Now if you ask:
Do we believe in throwing acid in womens faces? NO.
Do we believe in killing innocent people because they disagree with the president? NO
Do we believe in a dictator? NO
Do we believe in stoning people? NO
Do we believe in hijack planes and fly them into buildings killing thousands of innocent people? NO
Do we believe in toruring our citizens because they said something we don’t agree with? NO.
Do we believe in stoning or killing people because they are gay? NO
Do we believe in cutting off the hands of someone who stold? NO.
Do we believe in Sharia law? NO.
I could name more.
Quite possible people found ways to justify these actions, in a similar way Britain and America found dubious ways to justify bombing Iraq, who is more wrong?

Where do the greatest commandments come onto the decision making of our countries?

Blessings

Eric
 
Hello rev kevin;

Quite possible people found ways to justify these actions, in a similar way Britain and America found dubious ways to justify bombing Iraq, who is more wrong?

Where do the greatest commandments come onto the decision making of our countries?

Blessings

Eric
It was faulty intellagence information about WMD’s. Britain and America along with other countries all believed there was WMD’s and they acted on that information. It turned out to be fauly information.

Its easy to ask where do the greatest commandments come onto the decision making of our countries when your not in their seats. Its easy to be a arm chair QB once the hard decisions are made. Its easy to say “I would have done it another way” when you were not present during any of the coversations. What if there were WMD’s there and our governments did nothing about it and the WMD’s were used. You would be singing a different tune today. You would be saying, “Why didn’t they go in a bomb the h— out of them. How could they let this happen.” Or would you have said, “Lets remember to do the greatest commandments while making decisions even if its too late.”
How did you feel when you saw those 2 planes hit the WTC? Did you say, “Oh I’m sure they will find some way to justify their actions.” I’ll bet thats not what you said nor how you felt. How did you feel when you saw people jumping out of the buildings so they would not burn to death? What would you say to those families who lost husbands, wives, brothers, sisters, fathers, mothers. aunts, uncles. Would you say to them “Ya know I’m sure they will justify their actions.”

Who’s more wrong. Years upon years upon years upon years upon years these things have been happening to these people. And you have to ask “who’s more wrong.”

Sure we make mistakes. Sure we are not perfect. But we are a heck of a lot better then those countries, those dictators, those terroists, who kill their citizens for no good reason. Who blow up innocent people, men women and children for no reason and what I posted earler. All this is done on a daily basis, not once in a while or by bad information its done purposly everyday.These people live in fear every second of their lives. Do you? Do you have to worry about what they worry about? Do you go through what they go through on a daily basis? And you ask WHO"S MORE WRONG.
 
Hello sidbrown;

I can imagine centuries ago Indians were complaining about illegal settlers taking their jobs, their land, their food supply. I can imagine that the Indians had very little say, when it came to setting the law of the land.

Blessings

Eric
HMM lets see, where did these illegal settlers come from?
Who were these illegal settlers?
Answer:They came from England they were English settlers and a part of the UK which consists of the following 4 countries, England, Northern Ireland, Scotland and Whales.
 
You folks who equate the expansion to the West in the early days of our Republic with current illegal immigrants who violate establish laws need to walk the talk. What is your solution?? Why dont you give up your home to some Indian relative?
Because with you, its all about “FEELING” good about YOU regardless of the effects of your arguments…
Mistakes made with the Indians in 1870 is NOT a reason to allow unlimited millions in this nation NOW. (and Indians were fighting and killing each other over land and they were moving chasing the buffalo LONG before the British come here)…and then—go read the catachism about illegal immigration. As it says…we are not ABLE to take everyone in here !! and if you were logically consistent, YOU wouldnt WANT all these illegals in here…just like you didnt want all those terrible British coming in here. Right??? Read this !! NO ILLEGAL immigration.
jimmyakin.typepad.com/defensor_fidei/2006/03/immigration_cat.html
and then
read how the illegal killed this poor nun . Its tragic.
washingtontimes.com/news/2010/aug/2/illegal-immigrant-killed-nun-released-by-feds/?clear_cache_true
 
my final point is I think Our Lady of Guadalupe is sending people from Mexico here because it is the only way our country is stabilizing our population because the number of abortions we are having as a country. As a country we would be dying without this influx of illegals from Catholic countries. Also they help us be more Catholic…my 2cents
Be very careful in your discernment……remember, Satan often appears as an angel of light.

I’ve heard your second comment before from others, and I must admit, it puzzles me. How do Hispanics help us be more Catholic?
 
Unfortunately, Cardinal Mahony has spoken of a mandate from God.
The fact that he has said this doesn’t make it true. In fact, if there was some mandate from God wouldn’t you expect to hear of it from the pope? The Magisterium? Other bishops? Cardinal Mahony may believe what he said but *it is solely his opinion *and no one has any obligation to accept it.
If Holy Scripture mandates how we are to treat aliens, then it is another reason why this is a matter of faith and morals.
I am not interested in your interpretation of scripture. Show me a Church document stating that the US must have open borders and give amnesty to illegals. I’ll give you some examples of what I have in mind:

*Political authorities, for the sake of the common good for which they are responsible, may make the exercise of the right to immigrate subject to various juridical conditions, especially with regard to the immigrants’ duties toward their country of adoption. *(CCC 2241)

It is not the role of the Pastors of the Church to intervene directly in the political structuring and organization of social life. This task is part of the vocation of the lay faithful (CCC 2242)

Illegal immigration should be prevented … (JPII 1996)

The Church recognizes the right of States to control their borders and the entry of persons in their territory – to guarantee security, basic human rights and freedoms – considering it in line with the protection of the common good.
(Pontifical Council For the Pastoral Care of Migrants, 2006)

*The Church recognizes this right in every human person, in its dual aspect of the possibility to leave one’s country and the possibility to enter another country to look for better conditions of life. Certainly, the exercise of such a right is to be regulated, because practicing it indiscriminately may do harm and be detrimental to the common good of the community that receives the migrant. *(Message, JPII 2001)

If you can quote any Church document saying that open borders and amnesty are mandates from God, then show us. Otherwise, recognize Mahony’s comments for what they are: his own opinion, nothing more.

Ender
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top