C
Cone
Guest
As for Catholics, I would say we recognize our sinfulness. That’s the difference.
Depends, if you mean can they be good without God in the strict sense of being a better person, of course they can. Going on the assumption that the catholic church is the one true way (which many of you do otherwise you wouldn’t be here) there isn’t multiple ways but there are better methods of going up that way.More often than not, when I open up to people about my Catholic faith I hear the above or “I know a lot of really moral people that don’t believe in God” and similar “one doesn’t have to believe in God to be a good person” type responses.
How would you respond to that?
I have been a Catholic since March 31 or this year so do not have all the answers yet (as if I ever will!)
Thank you!!!
Responses like this make me very angry. Go build a huge wall, get all your catholic friends together an go live in your new Jerusalem then. Stop hindering the rest of humankind by shrug off our advancements with your half informed votes at the polls and your mocking derision.Religion isn’t about making this world better. It’s about preparing ourselves for the next one.
Needing God is a better way of wording this argument, you need God to do it best not you need god to do it at all.Ask them why they think just because someone is “good”, that they don’t “need” God. It sounds like they’re trying to boil God down to nothing more than a lawgiver, totally ignoring that He is a savior.
First, bad thing happening doesn’t take from the good or so the pro crusade people would have you believe.Ah yes, advancements including prenatal infanticide
Sex always has meaning, you are horny you have sex. When your thirsty you drink.meaningless sex
The government does that more often then “society”. Go look up the separation of children from parents by immigration.destruction of families
Life happens, you don’t get to say its a bad thing when the benefits outweigh the penalties and the math back up divorce.widespread divorce
Saying that someone is a “good person” is, on its own, extremely vague. When someone says that they don’t “need God” to be good, that’s cleaning it up a bit and gives a better idea of what they’re trying to say. They’re making a judgement about morality and are coming to the conclusion that they can either be an impeccable person without the Divine, or they’re OK with being just an “OK” person because it’s extremely difficult to follow all of God’s precepts.Needing God is a better way of wording this argument, you need God to do it best not you need god to do it at all.
Religion isn’t about making this world better, not primarily. It is about preparing ourselves for the next one.Religion isn’t about making this world better. It’s about preparing ourselves for the next one.
It makes sense from a Catholic perspective that being with God in heaven is what’s most important in the end. But this doesn’t have anything to do with hindering the rest of mankind. Why does this response make you angry?
Stop hindering the rest of humankind by shrug off our advancements with your half informed votes at the polls and your mocking derision.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^Stop hindering the rest of humankind by shrug off our advancements with your half informed votes at the polls and your mocking derision.