W
wanner47
Guest
No one is “homosexual to begin with.” Are you saying that some babies are homosexual? How do you know?Actually I was refering to the part being quoted, not the whole bible.
But that part does make the distinction by pointing out that they were naturally hetrosexual who then committed homosexual acts:
“and the men likewise gave up natural relations with women and were consumed with passion for one another, men committing shameless acts with men and receiving in their own persons the due penalty for their error.”
That part there is a big clue.
There is no mention of those who were homosexual to begin with and the quoted part is very clear in that it was discussing hetrosexuals commiting homosexual acts.
Exactly. So why should I, or anyone else, listen to or believe what you say about interpretation of Scripture?Of course its silly, it asks if I am mentioned in the Bible for starters and then goes on to suggest that I claimed to be infallible translator/interpreter of Scripture when I never made such a claim (in fact nobody can) and that is also mentioned in the Bible.
There isn’t an infallible translation, but thankfully Christ gave us an infallible interpreter – the Catholic Church.Why should you trust anyones, since there isnt an infalible translation. In fact many words are ambigous so are extremly difficult to translate, unless you can ask the author what they intended.
You certainly seem to claim to know its authoritative teachings on homosexuality.Well for starters, I have an open mind and I dont claim to to know everything written in the bible.
Actually, it’s quite clear in that homosexual acts are sins. That is what the Church teaches as well. Teen4Christ seems to deny that the Bible teaches that homosexual acts of any nature are immoral, which is why I cited those verses.You will notice that I only stated that the Romans verses doesnt condemn homosexuality (and even then I agree that it does condemn some practicing homosexuality). The Corinthians verses I didnt comment on if it condems or condones homosexuality, merely that the translation that was used is inaccurate (which it is). Its ambigous and doesnt clearly say one way or another.