A
AgnosTheist
Guest
You mean you are stopping all sexual activities until you get married (if that ever happens)?I do.
You mean you are stopping all sexual activities until you get married (if that ever happens)?I do.
Well having oral/anal sex with men is not following the teachings of christianityI do.
No, you don’t. Christ and his apostles taught that engaging in homosexual acts was immoral. You say that you don’t believe engaging in homosexual acts is immoral and that you have engaged in such acts. Therefore, you are not following the teachings of Christ and his apostles.I do.
Make up your mind. A person attracted to the opposite sex can either control his actions, or he can’t. Even if same-sex attraction is in the genes, it doesn’t excuse him for the reasons given. But if you are going to say say it’s not a habit or an obession, that is, he is in full command of his behevior, then you can’t appeal to the he-can’t-help-it-it’s-his-genes argument. You can’t have it both ways. And we are back to only thing that matters: are homosexual acts wrong in and of themselves? He asked for the Church’s answer, got an emphatic “Yes they are!”, didn’t like that answer, and now we are on this rabbit trail trying to logic-chop away the plain truth.still a false analogy. cleptomania is a habit, an obsession. gayness is not.
I’m not catholic anymore, i’m non-denominational. Yes, I believe God loves all and wouldn’t send someone to hell for their orientation, I don’t know. It’s a good username, I believe in Christ, I worship christ, I’ve read his word many times.Teen4Christ,
How do you reconcile your sexual orientation and activities with that of your roman catholic faith? Clearly, according to church laws, you are gonna burn in hell. But what do you believe? What are you gonna do now? And why do you call yourself ‘teen for christ’? How exactly are you ‘for christ’?
Yes, it isn’t…Well having oral/anal sex with men is not following the teachings of christianity
So… you believe in Christ, you worship Christ, you’ve read His word many times… but you have no intention of following His teachings.I’m not catholic anymore, i’m non-denominational. Yes, I believe God loves all and wouldn’t send someone to hell for their orientation, I don’t know. It’s a good username, I believe in Christ, I worship christ, I’ve read his word many times.
Your right your orientation is not a sin, YOUR ANAL/ORAL SEX ACTS WITH MALES IS, that will get you sent some place toasty if you do not repent!I’m not catholic anymore, i’m non-denominational. Yes, I believe God loves all and wouldn’t send someone to hell for their orientation, I don’t know. It’s a good username, I believe in Christ, I worship christ, I’ve read his word many times.
Maybe they are, maybe they aren’t.Your right your orientation is not a sin, YOUR ANAL/ORAL SEX ACTS WITH MALES IS, that will get you sent some place toasty if you do not repent!
No, I don’t. But I do believe if two men are married it’s ok,But you still think it is ok?
![]()
if same sex attraction is in the genes then its time to scrap your bible which subjectively condemns homosexual acts. for how can you blame a person that acts out the very core nature that God has given him? there is a conflict here, which is wrong mother nature or that bundle of contradictions called the bible?Make up your mind. A person attracted to the opposite sex can either control his actions, or he can’t. Even if same-sex attraction is in the genes, it doesn’t excuse him for the reasons given.
I think you have reading comprehension issues.Maybe they are, maybe they aren’t.
Whatever.II have to leave right now but i’ll get to all of your guy’s questions later.
![]()
Ah, so now we have clarification. So, why did you ask if you were destined to hell for your acts, when you have 1] already rejected the Catholic church and 2] have already made up your mind that God won’t send you to hell?I’m not catholic anymore, i’m non-denominational. Yes, I believe God loves all and wouldn’t send someone to hell for their orientation, I don’t know. It’s a good username, I believe in Christ, I worship christ, I’ve read his word many times.
Alcoholism also has a genetic component. Does that mean that it’s acceptable to abuse alcohol?if same sex attraction is in the genes then its time to scrap your bible which subjectively condemns homosexual acts. for how can you blame a person that acts out the very core nature that God has given him? there is a conflict here, which is wrong mother nature or that bundle of contradictions called the bible?
No, I don’t. But I do believe if two men are married it’s ok,
take this with you to wherever it is your going.Maybe they are, maybe they aren’t.
II have to leave right now but i’ll get to all of your guy’s questions later.
![]()
That’s a silly argument and you know it. Many heterosexuals manage to keep in their pants for years before marriage, and many are able to stay celibate their whole lives. We are rational beings; just because we have innate urges (I want to have sex with the pretty girl on the bus) does not mean we have to act on them. There is, therefore neither anything wrong with mother nature or the Bible.if same sex attraction is in the genes then its time to scrap your bible which subjectively condemns homosexual acts. for how can you blame a person that acts out the very core nature that God has given him? there is a conflict here, which is wrong mother nature or that bundle of contradictions called the bible?
alcholism in no way a core component of human life. sexuality is. its basic instincts, man!Alcoholism also has a genetic component. Does that mean that it’s acceptable to abuse alcohol?![]()
This is the tired It-exists-in-nature-therefore-it’s ok argument. For someone expounding reason in their sig, I would think why this is a turkey argument would be obvious. now you are just trolling. Bye-bye.if same sex attraction is in the genes then its time to scrap your bible which subjectively condemns homosexual acts. for how can you blame a person that acts out the very core nature that God has given him? there is a conflict here, which is wrong mother nature or that bundle of contradictions called the bible?