I'm not a Catholic because

  • Thread starter Thread starter PJM
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Thanks for the caution, PR, but why do you think I stated what I did that way? I did not, you notice, make a broad statement of generality claiming things about “all” or “every.”
Excellent! Then you’re on the right path. 👍

Keep learning and reading the CAFs posters (in light of the Catechism et al) and you’ll be good. 🙂
 
the Pope makes his own commandments and does not submit to my God who tells me to keep his commandments.
 
What is this impasse that you believe caused you to believe you were deceived. As a member of the OHCAC I want to know… maybe I need out too…let me know.:eek:
Why do you insist on shouting at us??? Do you think we are trying to ignore you? What is with all that bf red in hypertype?? Calm down, buddy, please…
 
PR, would that include some who are allowed to identify as Catholic?
Indeed. The canon by which everything Catholic ought to be measured by is the Catechism, which is the “sure norm” of the faith.
 
What in heaven’s name do you mean by “the Almighty Self?”
I’m guessing she means so many non Catholic denominations have sprouted when believers have for themselves read and searched the Scripture and interpreted in a sola scriptura manner. And unless a believer adheres to all Catholic teaching, they are not in perfect communion with the Almighty God.
 
What in heaven’s name do you mean by “the Almighty Self?”
It means that if you don’t have the Church as your authority to discern what’s true and of God, then you have to use another authority–and the default one is yourself.

Thus, let’s say the Church says, “Mary is not part of the Trinity”, but you reject that. You discern, of your own accord, “I want to be able to have a woman be worshipped, so I’m going to declare that Mary is divine”, then what you have done is use your own preferences to be the default authority.
 
I’m guessing she means so many non Catholic denominations have sprouted when believers have for themselves read and searched the Scripture and interpreted in a sola scriptura manner. And unless a believer adheres to all Catholic teaching, they are not in perfect communion with the Almighty God.
No, Matt. Not even close.

BTW, I am perfectly capable of answering for myself, thank you very much. 🙂
 
Pope Benedict has clearly indicated that true Christianity is not limited to the Roman Catholic expression.
1voice, actually you might be in a better position than someone who at one time believed the Catholic Church was necessary for salvation but later did not remain. CCC judges those folks could not be saved.

From CCC 846 “Hence they could not be saved who, knowing that the Catholic Church was founded as necessary by God through Christ, would refuse either to enter it or to remain in it”
 
1voice, actually you might be in a better position than someone who at one time believed the Catholic Church was necessary for salvation but later did not remain. CCC judges those folks could not be saved.

From CCC 846 “Hence they could not be saved who, knowing that the Catholic Church was founded as necessary by God through Christ, would refuse either to enter it or to remain in it”
Yes. It’s like turning away from your wife. You know she’s your wife. You were married to her. You agree that you were married. But you decide that you just don’t want to be part of the marriage.
 
No, Matt. Not even close.

BTW, I am perfectly capable of answering for myself, thank you very much. 🙂
Hmm. Sorry PR. I was mistaken then as to what you believed. I had thought unless folks adhered to Catholic interpretation and not their own, that they were not in perfect communion. And that because people interpret for themselves, all sorts of denominations have sprouted. I bad though I guess. In any case Happy New Year.
 
Hmm. Sorry PR. I was mistaken then as to what you believed. I had thought unless folks adhered to Catholic interpretation and not their own, that they were not in perfect communion. And that because people interpret for themselves, all sorts of denominations have sprouted. I bad though I guess. In any case Happy New Year.
You are arguing separate things, Matt. The above statements are true, but they are non-sequiturs, as far as what Whadya was discussing.

Happy New Year to you, too! I should be cleaning the house in prep for tonight’s festivities, but instead here I am chatting on the CAFs. My bad! 😦
 
=Omar Gatskill;8758056]Because I don’t believe that Catholicism today represents the full history and practice of Christianity established by the Apostles. By the same token, the Evangelicals I believe are totally out of the loop.
OK, let’s talk:)

Can you be more specific?

I’m pretty well informed, perhaps I can clarify for you?

By the way what is the authority og the Bible in you’re view?

God Bless,
Pat **
 
the Pope makes his own commandments and does not submit to my God who tells me to keep his commandments.
Hi! Welcome to CAF! Are you from CARM by any chance? 😃
Pope Benedict has clearly indicated that true Christianity is not limited to the Roman Catholic expression.
If he has said that, either he has not done so as shepherd and teacher of all Christians (ex cathedra, and thus authoritatively), or I’ve not heard about it and would like a citation to back up your claims.

Of course Protestantism isn’t completely unChristian. But according to the CCC:
838 "The Church knows that she is joined in many ways to the baptized who are honored by the name of Christian, but do not profess the Catholic faith in its entirety or have not preserved unity or communion under the successor of Peter."322 Those "who believe in Christ and have been properly baptized are put in a certain, although imperfect, communion with the Catholic Church."323
This means that although you have taken the first step - a Trinitarian baptism - you and other Protestant Christians are not Christians in the fullest sense as such yet.

In a way, it’s like being a Jew. They also profess a belief in God the Father, and that the Messiah will come and save them someday. They, too, hold fast to the Scriptures and the Traditions of their fathers. But like the Protestants, they rejected something that makes them less-than-Christian. Jews rejected the Son. And Protestants rejected the Church founded by the Son.
 
The phrase “Catholic Interpretation” has always seemed a little odd to me because we as Catholics are free to read the Bible and interpret verses and books freely… such as for example; Ezekiel. We can read and decide that maybe the strange things he saw were UFO’s. The Catholic Church does not have an interpretation of every word in the Bible. We have a lot of freedom to examine the Bible and speculate. What we not have the freedom to do is add or detract or change any aspect or particle of the deposit of faith. This protects us from division and heresy and error. Works for me:thumbsup:
 
=1voice;8758205]Re: I’m not a Catholic because …
The Word of God has never asked me to become a Catholic.
REALLY:shrug:

And you say that because?

Jesus formed only One church and approves only One set of Faith beliefs. Today’s CC is HOME for both. Because the Bible was 100% written by the end of the 1st. Century; every thing in the NT was written by Catholicss for Catholics. The term “church” was 1st introduced by Jesus in Mt. 16: 15-19, where He gives the keys to heaven to Peter. “The Way” Acts.24: 5,14 For we have found this man a pestilent fellow, an agitator among all the Jews throughout the world, and a ringleader of the sect of the Nazarenes. But this I admit to you, that** according to the Way,** which they call a sect, I worship the God of our fathers, believing everything laid down by the law or written in the prophets"
Later became “Christians” in about 80 AD ,
Acts.11: .[26] and when he had found him, he brought him to Antioch. For a whole year they met with the church, and taught a large company of people; and in Antioch the disciples were for the first time called Christians.
And in 110 AD we were first called Caholics.

No OTHER Church and No other Christian religion would come un the scene until the GREAT Schism of 1010 when the Orthodox broke away from Rome. SO for the first thousand years after the death of Jesus ONLY the CC existed. This is Historical fact dear friend,

God Bless,
Pat:)
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top