IMO... It's better to be Protestant, but tell me why it's better to be Catholic

  • Thread starter Thread starter One_in_Christ_1
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sorry, I do not see LDS to be part of the family of God. The right way to salvation is through faith in Christ, including the sacraments.
LDS believes in the Bible, the divinity of Jesus, Jesus’ atonement and resurrection, and salvation through Jesus alone.

Sounds like a perfectly bona-fide member of the family of God (by protestant standards) to me.

😉
 
This reminds me of something I find very hard…talking to an active Protestant relative of mine who is very impressed by things a particular bishop has written, and this has led her to view the resurrection as, well, not quite real. She rejects St. Paul, so it was no use quoting to her from 1Cor about the resurrection and in vain and such. It is hard to find common ground between the two of us. Things I assume a Protestant would believe, she does not.

I completely agree with you that the doctrine of Justification (or atonement) is not uniform across Protestant groups. This is why I mentioned earlier that some groups will not accept that a practicing Catholic can be justified (unless they give it up).
I think historic Protestants line up with many Catholic beliefs (shared creeds) … much more than liberal Protestants. We also share views written by church theologians throughout the ages. It would be very difficult for me to share with your Protestant relative who rejects Saint Paul. Does that mean that the 13 or 14 letters of Paul are not considered inspired and left out of their Bible?
 
Here is more Catholic teaching on justification.
Can you post what you particular Church denomination teaches you on justification.

THE
CATHOLIC TEACHING ON WHAT JUSTIFICATION IS.
As baptized Catholics, we can agree that we have been justified and we have been saved. Thus, in one sense, our justification and salvation is in the past as a completed action. The initial grace of justification and salvation we receive in baptism is a done deal. And Catholics do not believe we were partially justified or partially saved at baptism. Catholics believe, as Peter says in 1 Peter 3:21, “Baptism… now saves you…” Ananias said to Saul of Tarsus, “Rise and be baptized, and wash away your sins, calling on his name” (Acts 22:16). That means the new Christian has been “washed… sanctified… [and] justified” as 1 Corinthians 6:11 remarks. That much is a done deal; thus, it is entirely proper to say we “have been justified” and we “have been saved.” However, this is not the end of the story. Scripture reveals that through this justification and salvation the new Christian experiences in baptism, he enters into a process of justification and salvation requiring his free cooperation with God’s grace. If we read the very next verses of our above-cited texts, we find the writer telling us there is more to the story.

Romans 5:1-2 states, “Therefore, since we are justified by faith, we have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ. Through him we have obtained access to this grace in
which we stand, and we rejoice in our hope of sharing the glory of God.”

This text indicates that after having received the grace of justification, we now have access to God’s grace by which we stand in Christ and we can then rejoice in the hope of sharing God’s glory. That word hope indicates that what we are hoping for we do not yet ]possess.
“For we are his workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for good works, which God prepared beforehand, that we should walk in them” (Eph. 2:10). Without a doubt, we must continue to work in Christ as Christians; it is also true that it is only by the grace of God we can continue to do so. But even more importantly, Scripture tells us this grace can be resisted. Second Corinthians 6:1 tells us that "Working together with him, then, we entreat you not to accept the grace of God in vain."
St. Paul urged believers in Antioch—and all of us by implication—“to continue in the grace of God.” Indeed, Paul warns Christians that they can “fall from grace” in Galatians 5:4. This leads us to our next and most crucial point.

This example of justification being obtained in the future is not an isolated case. Numerous biblical texts indicate both justification and salvation to be future and contingent realities:
Romans 2:13-16: For it is not the hearers of the law who are righteous before God, but the doers of the law who will be justified … on that day when, according to my gospel, God judges the secrets of men by Jesus Christ.
Romans 6:16: Do you not know that if you yield yourselves to anyone as obedient slaves, you are slaves of the one whom you obey, either of sin, which leads to death, or of obedience which leads to righteousness? (Greek dikaiosunen, “justification”)
Matthew 10:22: And you will be hated of all men for my name’s sake. But he who endures to the end will be saved.
Peace, Carlan
That’s very good. Is this official Catholic teaching, or is it a commentary from an ex-Protestant who now works at Catholic Answers? When you asked what my particular denomination teaches, it doesn’t work the same for me as it does for you. I draw from the entire visible church (or want to try), which crosses denominational lines and traditions. This seems to some as individualistic, and autonomous… but I believe this is wise because Christians from various denominations and traditions are really One in Christ. I take Ephesians 4 seriously, that God gives the universal church teachers to mature the saints and grow us up in Christ… So, teachers given by God for the edification and building up the saints can include Church Fathers, Augustine, Luther, Calvin, etc… up to teachers in our generation.
 
LDS believes in the Bible, the divinity of Jesus, Jesus’ atonement and resurrection, and salvation through Jesus alone.

Sounds like a perfectly bona-fide member of the family of God (by protestant standards) to me.

😉
I believe in unity within orthodoxy as defined in the ecumenical creeds such as the Apostle’s Creed. Protestants do not receive Mormons as brothers in Christ, we share the truth in love with them.
 
that would be Lutheran? not many of those left:shrug: or… protestant=“general term merely to signify people who believe in Christ who exist outside of the Catholic church”
I know the word Protestant is loaded and covers too much ground in our generation. I’m simply a Christian who once was blind, and now I see by the grace of God alone.
 
This is a new denomination? :confused:Most historic creedal Protestant faiths hail from Luther, Calvin or Wesley. Which one do you indentify with?
I believe Luther, Calvin and Wesley embraced the same ecumenical creeds that you received as truth.
 
I believe Luther, Calvin and Wesley embraced the same ecumenical creeds that you received as truth.
That’s great but these men had differing views on justification, hence my (unanswered) question. I don’t think the Catholic here are trying to pry but rather see what your views are and how they relate to Catholicism, especially since one is better than the other from your OP.
 
Sorry, I do not see LDS to be part of the family of God. The right way to salvation is through faith in Christ, including the sacraments.
'outside of the church there is no salvation" that would imply that neither LDS or any other protestant is granted salvation…there is a copy of the catechism of the catholic church readily available…so why are you here? to incite? my faith in unmovable,every word of the catechism is truth to me. ALL of the countless thousands of protestant faiths are false and all that followed after the lutheran church “protest” the lutheran church, which one is just? and round and round we go:shrug:
 
That’s great but these men had differing views on justification, hence my (unanswered) question. I don’t think the Catholic here are trying to pry but rather see what your views are and how they relate to Catholicism, especially since one is better than the other from your OP.
I thought all three of those men believed in a forensic justification. What did Wesley believe? I believe in a forensic justification which is the historic position of Protestantism.
 
'outside of the church there is no salvation" that would imply that neither LDS or any other protestant is granted salvation…there is a copy of the catechism of the catholic church readily available…so why are you here? to incite? my faith in unmovable,every word of the catechism is truth to me. ALL of the countless thousands of protestant faiths are false and all that followed after the lutheran church “protest” the lutheran church, which one is just? and round and round we go:shrug:
You are extra tough with your seperated brethren as defined by the Catholic Church. The Catholic Church receives Protestants who have been baptized in the Triune formula as brother and sisters in Christ. Mormons do not have that same status.
 
I believe in unity within orthodoxy as defined in the ecumenical creeds such as the Apostle’s Creed. Protestants do not receive Mormons as brothers in Christ, we share the truth in love with them.
do you think Jesus Christ would have wanted Christians divided into thousands of different denominations?
 
I thought all three of those men believed in a forensic justification. What did Wesley believe? I believe in a forensic justification which is the historic position of Protestantism.
I believe they do but each had their own confession along with the traditional creeds such as the Augsburg Confession (Luther) and Sixty-seven articles (Zwingli), some even creating their own catechisms. While each Protestant Father might have believed in forensic justification (I haven’t studied them all), their beliefs differ from each other. You noted this earlier.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top