Impeach Trump?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ChurchSoldier
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
New polls are already showing the Democrats falling way behind in the polls in many House and Senate races. Main factor is poor candidates and the other is people including Dems like myself are tired of Dems only worried about social issues and nothing more. Time to shut the small minority up and tell them to get their own party. The second reason is people are tired of hearing impeachment talks when nothing has been done other than Dems losing the election. Dem leaders are even more childish than Trump
 
New polls are already showing the Democrats falling way behind in the polls in many House and Senate races. Main factor is poor candidates and the other is people including Dems like myself are tired of Dems only worried about social issues and nothing more. Time to shut the small minority up and tell them to get their own party. The second reason is people are tired of hearing impeachment talks when nothing has been done other than Dems losing the election. Dem leaders are even more childish than Trump
Oh, my goodness, you have no idea how refreshing this is to hear, and I’m not even an American.
 
I’m amazed how Hillary supporters will follow and support her Blindly no matter what comes up. We will see where these investigations lead and what they uncover. Hopefully your eyes and heart will be opened to here deceit and corruption!
she cant be all that bad. news is out that she is looking into becoming a preacher and starting her own mega church.
 
I’m amazed how Hillary supporters will follow and support her Blindly no matter what comes up. We will see where these investigations lead and what they uncover. Hopefully your eyes and heart will be opened to here deceit and corruption!
It’s “following blindly” to simply point out that lots of people are looking to sell books and cash in on Hillary gossip? Wouldn’t the ones buying all these stupid Hillary books on WND, NewsMax, Amazon affiliate and Alex Jones, etc., be the ones “following blindly” since they’ll literally buy whatever asinine anti-Hillary book cane out today? How is it not “following blindly” to willingly throw your money away buying more stupid anti-Hillary books written by (predominantly) 9/11 truthers, birthers, Holocaust deniers, and climate change deniers? 🤷
 
MODERATOR NOTICE

Please charitably discuss the issues, not each other
 
It’s “following blindly” to simply point out that lots of people are looking to sell books and cash in on Hillary gossip? Wouldn’t the ones buying all these stupid Hillary books on WND, NewsMax, Amazon affiliate and Alex Jones, etc., be the ones “following blindly” since they’ll literally buy whatever asinine anti-Hillary book cane out today? How is it not “following blindly” to willingly throw your money away buying more stupid anti-Hillary books written by (predominantly) 9/11 truthers, birthers, Holocaust deniers, and climate change deniers? 🤷
The difficulty is that there is SO MUCH more material being revealed on a daily basis.

There is no end to the concealed scandals on Hillary that are being disclosed.

If anyone is interested, start with “Clinton Cash” by Peter Schweizer. HUNDREDS of footnotes [endnotes] [some people quibble].

If you visit Amazon, there are many many reviews AND the Amazon computer will call up many more similar books.

It is what we refer to as a “target-rich environment”.
 
The difficulty is that there is SO MUCH more material being revealed on a daily basis.

There is no end to the concealed scandals on Hillary that are being disclosed.

If anyone is interested, start with “Clinton Cash” by Peter Schweizer. HUNDREDS of footnotes [endnotes] [some people quibble].

If you visit Amazon, there are many many reviews AND the Amazon computer will call up many more similar books.

It is what we refer to as a “target-rich environment”.
No. Just…no. This is exactly point. Why do I have to “start” with any book that I have to buy?** If it’s news, I would expect to get this “news” from a credible news source – not buy another stupid book**. I’m not going to waste my money on another book of gossip that’s telling me the same thing every other book is going to tell me. And people accuse me of calling this “gossip” when it really is a bunch of no-name authors looking to cash in on more anti-Hillary garbage. Amazing.

Hawking Amazon links (referring people to buy books that aren’t published by Catholic Answers) supports my contention that it’s still gossip, and you have clearly demonstrated my point that it’s all about no-name authors looking to sell books that rehash the same anti-Hillary gossip every other book would have. It’s a broken record. If it’s legit news, I shouldn’t have to buy a book to learn about it. Period.
 
No. Just…no. This is exactly point. Why do I have to “start” with any book that I have to buy?** If it’s news, I would expect to get this “news” from a credible news source – not buy another stupid book**. I’m not going to waste my money on another book of gossip that’s telling me the same thing every other book is going to tell me. And people accuse me of calling this “gossip” when it really is a bunch of no-name authors looking to cash in on more anti-Hillary garbage. Amazing.

Hawking Amazon links (referring people to buy books that aren’t published by Catholic Answers) supports my contention that it’s still gossip, and you have clearly demonstrated my point that it’s all about no-name authors looking to sell books that rehash the same anti-Hillary gossip every other book would have. It’s a broken record. If it’s legit news, I shouldn’t have to buy a book to learn about it. Period.
Everyone needs to review the material published by Accuracy in Media.

aim.org

They expose the falsehoods being promulgated by the main stream media.

Accuracy in Media was founded in 1969 by a group of concerned citizens, led by economist Reed Irvine, who were troubled by the inaccuracies and one-sidedness they saw in the American media. Frustrated by the media’s unwillingness to address their individual concerns, they banded together to form Accuracy in Media, hoping that an organization would have more clout than individuals in getting the media to correct serious errors.

AIM began by sending letters to newspaper editors asking for corrections. If a newspaper refused to correct the error or print the letter, AIM bought advertising space in the paper to print the correction. In 1972, Accuracy in Media started publishing the AIM Report, a newsletter dedicated to correcting serious media errors. AIM began purchasing stock in major media corporations in 1975, which enabled its representatives to attend news companies’ annual shareholder meetings and ask executives to resolve issues with the corporation’s reporting. In an unprecedented victory in 1984, AIM persuaded PBS to air a documentary it produced challenging the network’s coverage of the Vietnam War.

AIM has built on these methods through the years, publishing countless articles, books, pamphlets, advertisements, documentaries, special reports, and commentaries; holding rallies, protests, and special events; and finding creative ways to draw attention to the issue of media bias and inaccuracy.

Originally a tiny all-volunteer group, Accuracy in Media has grown into an influential organization with several full-time media analysts and thousands of supporters. AIM has enjoyed great success in exposing and correcting errors, educating the public to become intelligent news consumers, and convincing media organizations to address errors they have made.
 
Thanks for the suggestions.
Partisan hacks, not to be taken seriously.
More like “anti-partisan”.

But it is easy to judge for yourself.

Just scroll down.

But for decades, Accuracy in Media has published a monthly newsletter which is excellent. They explore major stories in GREAT detail.

This link has the monthly newsletter going back to June of 2000:

aim.org/aim-report/

So just scroll down.

AND … Accuracy in Media also publishes special reports as well:

aim.org/special-report/
 
Everyone needs to review the material published by Accuracy in Media.

aim.org

They expose the falsehoods being promulgated by the main stream media.

Accuracy in Media was founded in 1969 by a group of concerned citizens, led by economist Reed Irvine, who were troubled by the inaccuracies and one-sidedness they saw in the American media. Frustrated by the media’s unwillingness to address their individual concerns, they banded together to form Accuracy in Media, hoping that an organization would have more clout than individuals in getting the media to correct serious errors.

AIM began by sending letters to newspaper editors asking for corrections. If a newspaper refused to correct the error or print the letter, AIM bought advertising space in the paper to print the correction. In 1972, Accuracy in Media started publishing the AIM Report, a newsletter dedicated to correcting serious media errors. AIM began purchasing stock in major media corporations in 1975, which enabled its representatives to attend news companies’ annual shareholder meetings and ask executives to resolve issues with the corporation’s reporting. In an unprecedented victory in 1984, AIM persuaded PBS to air a documentary it produced challenging the network’s coverage of the Vietnam War.

AIM has built on these methods through the years, publishing countless articles, books, pamphlets, advertisements, documentaries, special reports, and commentaries; holding rallies, protests, and special events; and finding creative ways to draw attention to the issue of media bias and inaccuracy.

Originally a tiny all-volunteer group, Accuracy in Media has grown into an influential organization with several full-time media analysts and thousands of supporters. AIM has enjoyed great success in exposing and correcting errors, educating the public to become intelligent news consumers, and convincing media organizations to address errors they have made.
Could you point to the place where they correct false reports favoring the right side of the political spectrum? I could not find that. Instead, I find complaints about the lack of coverage of a movie that flopped? (Really?)

It is not a good sign when a bias watchdog obviously has its own bias. You want to find critical eyes that do not have partisan blinders.

In the end, though, if you really care you are stuck looking at primary sources yourself. There is not a substitute for it, and in our information age there is not much excuse for failing to try to do it.
 
I don’t think any sitting president, even Trump who I think is a disaster, should be impeached or removed unless we have a just reason in accordance with our constitution. Most Americans don’t like him. Thats not enough to remove him. The 2020 election will do that.

But those calling the Russia investigation “nothing” seem to be in denial. It’s definitely something. Do I think it’s going to lead to Trumps removal? I have no idea. But Trump’s behavior (firing Comey), and the weird “lying-about-all-things-Russia-until-backed-into-a-corner” thing that those connected to the campaign keep doing, is plenty reason to warrant an investigation. If Trump and Co. did nothing wrong, they should have nothing to worry about…right?
 
And for you Clinton voters, keep pretending you are standing on higher moral ground, nothing bespeaks Christian values more than self-righteousness. :rolleyes:

And with that I bid you adieu.
Some of us think both Clinton AND Trump were horrible choices, and neither have any business being president. Just because someone calls Trump out for what he is doesn’t mean they love, or even supported, Clinton.
 
I’m amazed how Hillary supporters will follow and support her Blindly no matter what comes up. We will see where these investigations lead and what they uncover. Hopefully your eyes and heart will be opened to here deceit and corruption!
Replace Clinton with Trump. It’s amazing how well that works.

I’m not a Clinton supporter. Didn’t vote for her. But this endless harping on Clinton as a response to anything not pro-Trump is weird. I’m not worried about Clinton. If there’s something to find, let it be found. I’m more concerned about the investigation of the man actually in office.
 
I’m amazed how Hillary supporters will follow and support her Blindly no matter what comes up. We will see where these investigations lead and what they uncover. Hopefully your eyes and heart will be opened to here deceit and corruption!
Well…I’m kind of thinking that if you don’t support the Clintons no matter what, you’d have left by now. Maybe you’d hold your nose and vote for her if you thought Trump was even worse, but to be a supporter you have to have a very forgiving kind of confidence in spite of past behavior
 
Reasons to impeach Trump…
  1. Obstruction of justice
  2. His non stop lies.
  3. Using his presidential powers to amass wealth for himself e.g.( foreign dignataries that rent from him.)
  4. He is threatening war to North Korea and could get us in a nuclear war.
  5. Economic ties with Russia making him compromised.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top