V
Victoria33
Guest
Nope! That’s false. That is only said to allow the corruption of Burisma in the first place.
- Status
S
Sirach2
Guest
That very dishonest SOMEONE just happens to be the whistleblower who initiated the whole process to impeach the POTUS. It is extraordinarily germane to the whole proceeding! (I presume you are addressing the last part of my post about the 18th witness, rather than the issue with Bolton.) . . .
Last edited:
D
dvdjs
Guest
That is a matter of record. Not a matter of someone saying so. And the records have been linked here before.
Last edited:
J
JapaneseKappa
Guest
I mean, the whistleblower said “hey, I overheard people on this call talking about how bad it was.”
At which point Congress got the people in the call to testify about how bad the call was, under oath. They said it was pretty bad.
So what else do people want from the whistleblower? An “I told you so?”
V
Victoria33
Guest
It doesn’t matter what the records say. That is one side, that doesn’t mean it is factual.
D
dvdjs
Guest
In reality, that is exactly what matters.
V
Victoria33
Guest
Not if the system itself is corrupt, which it is.
D
dvdjs
Guest
The matter of record was the impeding by the corrupt Ukrainian prosecutor of a legal process in the UK.
J
JapaneseKappa
Guest
Last edited:
P
PaulinVA
Guest
And that is wrong because…?
If you think he’s lying, say so. What he is saying is in line with all of the other evidence, so there you go.
I’m still not sure why the whistleblower testimony matters. It is not germane to Trump’s conduct. Now, if you want to charge him with a crime, go right ahead. But, his evidence is corroborated by so many witnesses, he isn’t needed.
Last edited:
S
Sirach2
Guest
Not saying, except that there are always two sides to every assertion. I’m remembering the ruckus Christine Blasey Ford caused, and she had a lot of people believing her, except me. As it turned out, she was lying and as the investigation proceeded, she was proven false. But she got a lucrative book offer and $650,000 from “GoFundMe” - not too shabby, huh? What she put Kavanaugh, his family, his associates and the government through was criminal.
I trust in God’s justice and guidance to bring forth the truth in this matter, so Bolton doesn’t alarm me in any way whatsoever. Truth will again prevail!
PS. I watch a lot of forensic episodes, and despite the initial “evidence” that surfaces, there is always a loophole that will catch the fox.
Last edited:
P
PaulinVA
Guest
Sorry, I’m going to have to ask you to prove that. I just did a quick Google search and find no evidence of your assertion.
Do you really think God gets involved in things like this?
Life is not an episode of Law and Order.
Dum Dum
S
Sirach2
Guest
Loading…
theblacksphere.net
I followed this intently and do not have other transcripts on hand. I do remember that she lied about the polygraph test, and it came out that she was coaching others how to beat it.
Her husband also disputed a number of incriminating facts. It’s not critical to provide proof, for the matter has been concluded in Kavanaugh’s favor. I’ll see whether I saved anything during that process.
Last edited:
P
PaulinVA
Guest
I believe this was about not beating the polygraph but understanding it.
Loading…
www.wsj.com
Friend Rejects Claim That Ford Helped Her on Polygraph Test
Monica McLean, a friend of Christine Blasey Ford, rejected the assertion that Dr. Ford had coached her on how to take a polygraph test, as alleged by a former boyfriend of Dr. Ford in a letter to the Senate Judiciary Committee.“I have never had Christine Blasey Ford, or anybody else, prepare me, or provide any other type of assistance whatsoever in connection with any polygraph exam I have taken at anytime,” Ms. McLean said, in a statement released by Dr. Ford’s legal team.
S
Sirach2
Guest
It is easy to believe that Ford’s friend would back her up. How about the former boyfriend, who not only disputed this, but other matters as well, such as her bogus fear of flying. My memory is vague on some things, but I do know she was caught in a web of untruths.
My friend, you asked for backup from me, but this is of little consequence. I just meant to say initially that justice and truth will prevail as it did in the Kavanaugh confirmation, and that Bolton is not a concern of mine. Let’s go back to topic, ok?
P
PaulinVA
Guest
Back on topic. Let’s have lot’s of witnesses and documents.
Let’s just make sure the witnesses know about Trump’s behavior and aren’t just an attempt at political theater (Bidens, whistleblower, etc)
Let’s just make sure the witnesses know about Trump’s behavior and aren’t just an attempt at political theater (Bidens, whistleblower, etc)
T
Theo520
Guest
Though the friend didn’t confess, there was ample evidence Ford knew how they work and lied about her knowledge.
Practically, why would you expect the friend to open herself up to charges by the FBI for manipulating her exam.
M
Maximus1
Guest
If evil was the WHISLEBLOWER it wouldn’t matter.
That person advises what happens and who knows it.
When you check it, THE STORY IS TRUE AND ACCURATE.
TRUE AND ACCURATE IS PROVEN by the report and testimony of others.
Not him.
His veracity to the extent relevant I proven by the accuracy of the report.
How could the independant witnesses be less or more than what they are on the stand.
If you decided the facts based on the Whisleblowers anything, that decision would include an erronious consideration.
That person advises what happens and who knows it.
When you check it, THE STORY IS TRUE AND ACCURATE.
TRUE AND ACCURATE IS PROVEN by the report and testimony of others.
Not him.
His veracity to the extent relevant I proven by the accuracy of the report.
How could the independant witnesses be less or more than what they are on the stand.
If you decided the facts based on the Whisleblowers anything, that decision would include an erronious consideration.
M
Maximus1
Guest
It is just that the record is missing the star witness.
Last edited:
- Status