Impeachment of Donald J. Trump

  • Thread starter Thread starter dvdjs
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
You have the majority leader going on TV saying he is coordinating the strategy to implement for the defendant and will vote Aquittal, before his oath.
 
Maximus1 said:
You have the majority leader going on TV saying he is coordinating the strategy to implement for the defendant and will vote Aquittal, before his oath.
Click to expand...
I wonder if that included rushing the trial to conclude before the release of information from Bolton’s book?
 
Last edited:
They have been sitting on Bolton’s revelation for weeks. But their defense has always relied on him " keeping quiet"
Today is trash Bolton he’s always been no good day.
Graham and Cotton have a problem so you won’t see them trashing. Bolton is their hero and they take money from BOLTONS PAC.
 
Truth is, the nation is not going to judge this on those types of arguments.
Bolton. Hiding him. Not hiding him.
And
What is it he is going to say represents the concealment justification.
The answer will represent guilt. That’s how jurors simplify.
This is the last day. The Trump lawyers know better but Trump insists on an IT’S PERFECT" defense. It’s perfect is false. Will they change, offer CONTRITION, and say forgive, not a reason to remove? Catholic ethics offer the best defense
 
Last edited:
Ridgerunner said:
If you closely read what the NYT says is in the Bolton novel, it looks suspiciously like “Clintonspeak” that sounds like one thing but actually doesn’t quite say it.
Click to expand...
The NYT hasn’t even seen the manuscript. What they are reporting is what they heard is in the manuscript. The way it’s being peddled in the media is quite frankly astounding but not surprising.

Whatever he says makes no difference, it still doesn’t change the fact Trump did anything illegal or impeachable.
 
Last edited:
JapaneseKappa said:
That article wasn’t about how Bolton’s claims make the president more guilty it was about how Trumps’ attorneys could be guilty of making false claims to the senate.
Click to expand...
And, so? Can you show me where Trump’s attorneys “made false claims” to the senate? From your article:
A National Security Council spokesperson told Politico’s Meridith McGraw on Monday that no one on the president’s legal team has reviewed Bolton’s manuscript.
Click to expand...
“Ambassador Bolton’s manuscript was submitted to the NSC for pre-publication review and has been under initial review by the NSC. No White House personnel outside NSC have reviewed the manuscript,” the statement said.
Click to expand...
But reviewing the manuscript itself does not mean the president’s impeachment defense team was unaware of the information and allegations it put forth.
Click to expand...
Furthermore, not being unaware, as was mentioned above, does not demonstrate proof positive that Trump’s lawyers have made false claims to the Senate. Your concerns seem to be implausible red herrings.
 
Last edited:
If Bolton testifies Trump used the money to extort a Biden press conference, the case is fully proven.
Trump has now waived privilege.
Selfishly, I would hope they don’t let him testify. That would create a landslide by November. But in the nations interest, a good cleaning with the truth is best.
 
Maximus1 said:
Bolton , as far as we can tell, is going to parrot Trump’s precise words to the American people.
Click to expand...
He still could. The Dems didn’t mind introducing speculation and hearsay in their impeachment hearing. If they had Bolton’s actual words, they would repeat them. But they don’t. Probably the real objective is simply to have Bolton say critical things of other sorts. Probably he will.
 
Omigosh! Democrat organizations are critical of Trump’s case and the attorneys presenting it? Who would have expected that? :roll_eyes:
 
I am astounded and bewildered as to why you are presupposing these apparent distortions as criminal issues of singular distinction. Meanwhile, I marvel that you never mentioned the voluminous false and incriminating claims of the House Managers?

Whatever your motive in pursuing this, it will have miniscule bearing on the outcome of the trial, and even less outcome for the defense lawyers.

I would, however, shake in my shoes over the repercussions that face Joe Biden after the Senate further publicly discloses his corrupt activity in Ukraine.
 
Last edited:
Ridgerunner said:
He still could. The Dems didn’t mind introducing speculation and hearsay in their impeachment hearing. If they had Bolton’s actual words, they would repeat them. But they don’t. Probably the real objective is simply to have Bolton say critical things of other sorts. Probably he will.
Click to expand...
They don’t have Bolton’s actual words because Trump obstructed Congress. Hence, article of impeachment for Obstruction of Congress.
 
Too many lies to deal with when one also works. That has been the dem tactic for years; call policy differences “lies” and tell so many that nobody has time to quite deal with them. What was the latest count? The last Dem assertion I saw was 1600. But when you see their actual assertions, they’re nearly all just disagreements.
 
Ridgerunner said:
Too many lies to deal with when one also works. That has been the dem tactic for years; call policy differences “lies” and tell so many that nobody has time to quite deal with them. What was the latest count? The last Dem assertion I saw was 1600. But when you see their actual assertions, they’re nearly all just disagreements.
Click to expand...
How many lies by Trump is okay to you?
 
Morning Joe called it a " Confederacy of Dunces." Lol.
One said," Didn’t Ken Star know he was Ken star." Lol.
Pam Bondi was unintelligible. Apparently she received over 100k a year from Quatar for a no show job while criticizing Biden’s son( you can faintly hear the Twilight Zone Theme Song). Speaking after taking 25k from Trump when suddenly, WOOPS!" The Trump University lawsuit is dropped by her office.
 
Last edited:
drcube said:
They don’t have Bolton’s actual words because Trump obstructed Congress.
Click to expand...
No. They don’t have Bolton’s actual words because they don’t have Bolton’s actual words. Bolton could go on television today and tell what he thinks is so damning. He doesn’t because the suspense helps sell the book. It’s like the bogus lead headline of a tabloid.
 
Sirach2 said:
I am astounded and bewildered as to why you are presupposing these apparent distortions as criminal issues of singular distinction. Meanwhile, I marvel that you never mentioned the voluminous false and incriminating claims of the House Managers?
Click to expand...
Let’s have 'em!
Sirach2 said:
I would, however, shake in my shoes over the repercussions that face Joe Biden after the Senate further publicly discloses his corrupt activity in Ukraine.
Click to expand...
I just spit my coffee out. There is no evidence of that at all. Once again, if you have it, show it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top