Impeachment of Donald J. Trump

  • Thread starter Thread starter dvdjs
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
EmmaSowl said:
Prove that you read the report by giving a page number.
Click to expand...
I make an exception, just to let you know: it is my practice not to respond to posts in which I am addressed in the imperative voice.
 
Last edited:
7_Sorrows said:
I don’t watch CNN or MSNBC or read the NYT or the
Washington Post or the Huffington Post. So who knows what misinformation they have been told.
Click to expand...
PaulinVA said:
7_Sorrows,

I have subscriptions to The New York Times, the Washington Post, and the Wall Street Journal, watch CNN, MSNBC, and read Foxnews.com and CNN.com.

What sources do you rely upon that I am missing?
Click to expand...
I’ll ask again. What sources do you recommend?
 
PaulinVA said:
I’ll ask again. What sources do you recommend?
Click to expand...
Why not just wait for the Trudeau government approved list?

www.breitbart.com

Trudeau Minister Proposes Forcing News Websites to Have Govt Licence

Canadian Heritage Minister Steven Guilbeault has stated that news websites could be forced to obtain government licenses to operate in Canada.
www.breitbart.com www.breitbart.com

Then for certain you will know which leftist globalist (i.e., Democrat) talking points are approved for distribution and which are not.

Certainly those sources will have nothing to do with politics or which of them push the approved narrative to the uninformed masses who are incapable of discerning acceptable truth from fiction.

I mean spending $1.5 billion on a national broadcaster, the CBC, that spouts liberal talking points from every pore and kowtows to the UN/Globalist cabal at every turn is insufficient. And granting $595 million only to government “approved” media outfits a few months before a national election was not enough. Now licensing will only be granted to those who spout the acceptable narrative.

Good times.

Do you, by the way, approve this move by Trudeau?
 
Ridgerunner said:
They might, just to hear him criticize Trump on foreign policy. But they also know he doesn’t have the “goods” with the Ukraine thing, because it doesn’t exist.
Click to expand...
Why do you keep repeating what you don’t know?
 
drcube said:
Why do you keep repeating what you don’t know?
Click to expand...
Some things are obvious. When someone is able to do something they declare critically important, but don’t do it, it begs for disbelief. The Democrats could have called Bolton long ago. Bolton himself could, with impunity, make the critical statement right now. For Bolton, it’s all a “book tease”. For the Dems it’s squeezing the last bit of juice from a bit of propaganda.
 
Bolton has been threatened. His lawyers are working on the issues.
His publisher has a contract.
He threatened to sue House Dems. Then said he would honor a subpoena in the Senate. So call him now.
 
Maximus1 said:
hen said he would honor a subpoena in the Senate. So call him now.
Click to expand...
Trump said he would not object to it. But regardless, the Democrats had their opportunity to call him back during the impeachment hearings but didn’t even issue a subpoena for him. This is all just crocodile tears. The Dems didn’t actually want him to testify. The “tease” is worth more to them than the reality…to Bolton as well.
 
Trump ordered McCONELL and the GOP TO VOTE NO.
Ed Rollins said Collins was ," DEAD WOMAN WALKING.
ROMNEY was dis-invited from CPAC within hours of his vote.
Romney cannot be hurt financially. As Rollins made clear Collins is earmarked for the political death penalty. Terrorism must be maintained I guess.
Had their opportunity is the Trump argument. IT IS COMPLETELY ARBITRARY but has been given a fictitious meaning. Then repeated over and over.
Has nothing to do with the Senate. Never has.
There are no tears. General Kelly rightly called it a half a trial. It is cut and dry a McConell travesty.
Whatever Bolton says it will not be better than a drug deal.
 
Last edited:
If Mitch McConnell and Donald Trump are the gold standard of what constitutes a “Republican” then I don’t want to be one anymore.
 
Bill Kristol said the same thing today. Actually he became a Democrat. That is a radical change for a staunch bush guy.
 
Dems ought to admit they lost this round, but won’t.

I feel differently about Collins and Romney. Collins has always been what people call a RINO. She’s really a liberal. She’s at least being honest. Romney, however, is opposing Trump out of personal spite.
Maximus1 said:
Bill Kristol said the same thing today. Actually he became a Democrat.
Click to expand...
Not a surprise.
 
The biggest surprise when you look at his service with Reagan and both Bush’s.
Trump was a Democrat.
Bolton is another Reagan and both Bush’s Republican. Trump apparently is going total vindictive on him.
 
Ridgerunner said:
Some things are obvious. When someone is able to do something they declare critically important, but don’t do it, it begs for disbelief. The Democrats could have called Bolton long ago. Bolton himself could, with impunity, make the critical statement right now. For Bolton, it’s all a “book tease”. For the Dems it’s squeezing the last bit of juice from a bit of propaganda.
Click to expand...
It seems like Bolton is skirting a legal line where Trump has said his conversations with him are top secret. Of course, it probably won’t hold up in court, but I would be weary giving the total lack of respect of law and order taking place in this country.

If what you say is true, I would want Bolton to testify if I were Trump or a Republican. Some things are obvious, though, as you say. They don’t want him to because it will provide further evidence against Trump.
 
Maximus1 said:
Trump was a Democrat.
Click to expand...
So was I before I realized I could not remain faithful to the teachings of the Church and support the Dem party at the same time. That’s not terribly uncommon.
drcube said:
If what you say is true, I would want Bolton to testify if I were Trump
Click to expand...
Trump said so too. But he added that if that was to happen, he would also want Schiff, the Bidens and the fake whistleblower to testify. The Dems wouldn’t do that.
 
Maximus1 said:
The biggest surprise when you look at his service with Reagan and both Bush’s.
Trump was a Democrat.
Bolton is another Reagan and both Bush’s Republican. Trump apparently is going total vindictive on him.
Click to expand...
Reagan also was a democrat at one time and Bloomberg as well. I also used to be a democrat.

And Hillary was a Goldwater girl.
 
Last edited:
Ridgerunner said:
Trump said so too. But he added that if that was to happen, he would also want Schiff, the Bidens and the fake whistleblower to testify. The Dems wouldn’t do that.
Click to expand...
Well, if Trump said it, that means nothing. He lies constantly.

Of course, Trump and the Republicans would want to distract from the issue of Trump actual crimes to create a circus by bringing up stuff irrelevant to the case to distract. Kind of like what the right wing sources have been doing throughout this process, repeating falsehoods on the Bidens and Schiff.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top