Impeachment of Donald J. Trump

  • Thread starter Thread starter dvdjs
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
drcube said:
40.png
petra22:
If there was any truth to the charges… ANY of the charges… he could be history by November…the PEOPLE could vote him OUT! That would be more honest than this type of political hit job…
Click to expand...
Nah, you are vastly underestimating how many people get their ‘news’ from propaganda sources and come on sites like this and Facebook to defend the indefensible.
Click to expand...
Mirror, mirror…

There is at least one that we know of, using the typical Dem ploy of projecting their own “indefensible” behaviours onto those they are attacking.

Hence, for example:

Hillary attacking Trump for Russian collusion when she colluded with the Russians on the Skolkovo project to have her Russian partners “gain access to classified, sensitive, and emerging technology from the [US] companies.”
 
HarryStotle said:
Hillary attacking Trump for Russian collusion when she colluded with the Russians
Click to expand...
Biden attacking Trump for withholding Ukraine aid in exchange political favor when Biden (on video) withheld Ukraine aid in exchange political favor
 
HarryStotle said:
Mirror, mirror…

There is at least one that we know of, using the typical Dem ploy of projecting their own “indefensible” behaviours onto those they are attacking.

Hence, for example:

Hillary attacking Trump for Russian collusion when she colluded with the Russians on the Skolkovo project to have her Russian partners “gain access to classified, sensitive, and emerging technology from the [US] companies.”
Click to expand...
So, you give one example when the right wing propaganda machine was kicking out nothing but garbage for the last two decades. False equivalency much.
 
drcube said:
40.png
HarryStotle:
Mirror, mirror…

There is at least one that we know of, using the typical Dem ploy of projecting their own “indefensible” behaviours onto those they are attacking.

Hence, for example:

Hillary attacking Trump for Russian collusion when she colluded with the Russians on the Skolkovo project to have her Russian partners “gain access to classified, sensitive, and emerging technology from the [US] companies.”
Click to expand...
So, you give one example when the right wing propaganda machine was kicking out nothing but garbage for the last two decades. False equivalency much.
Click to expand...
The “right-wing propaganda machine” for the “last two decades?” That is hilarious. 🤣

The propaganda machine has been left wing since the 1960s. Nice try, though.
 
Last edited:
mrad25 said:
Said best “ Quite frankly, having Adam Schiff lecture the Senate about fairness and due process is like listening to an arsonist talk about fire prevention.”
Click to expand...
@mrad25. This is the best analogy I have read in a long time.
 
JapaneseKappa said:
40.png
HarryStotle:
The “right-wing propaganda machine” for the “last two decades?” That is hilarious.
Click to expand...
Roger Ailes' Secret Nixon-Era Blueprint for Fox News
Click to expand...
To be clear…

A number of studies done between 2016 and 2019 have found that between 87% and 97% of journalists donate to Democratic or left wing political candidates.

Loading…

ballotpedia.org

Even worse, the data on contributions from various government bureaucracies demonstrate a very left-wing leaning. Which makes a lot of sense since Democrats/Socialists are all for growing government bureaucracies by legislating more regulations, whereas Conservative/Republican politicians tend towards reducing the size of government.

(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)

“Right-wing propaganda machine?” Yeah, right.

And we wonder why Schiff had no problems finding individuals like Yovanovitch (Dept of State) or that the DOJ/FBI has been putting al kinds of stumbling blocks in the way of investigating the illicit surveillance of the Trump campaign and promoting the Russian collusion hoax.
 
Last edited:
The democrats threw a lot of spaghetti at the wall to see what is going to stick.
 
At this point Trump can never be aquitted in the minds of most Americans. And that was thr goal.
 
Maximus1 said:
Many? I am sorry, I watched the presentation.
Click to expand...
I guess the democrats are hoping everyone watching assumes
Schiff is being truthful. And they won’t bother to check
the facts.

Schiff spent 3 hours reading from a binder. This is the
Adam Schiff show.
 
HarryStotle said:
A number of studies done between 2016 and 2019 have found that between 87% and 97% of journalists donate to Democratic or left wing political candidates.
Click to expand...
I doubt that 87% to 97% of any profession donate to political candidates, so this very much looks made up to me.
 
drcube said:
40.png
HarryStotle:
A number of studies done between 2016 and 2019 have found that between 87% and 97% of journalists donate to Democratic or left wing political candidates.
Click to expand...
I doubt that 87% to 97% of any profession donate to political candidates, so this very much looks made up to me.
Click to expand...
It isn’t made up, but you are correct. As stated it is inaccurate.

I should have written: …between 87% and 97% of journalists [who donate to a political party] donate to Democratic or left wing political candidates.
 
HarryStotle said:
It isn’t made up, but you are correct. As stated it is inaccurate.

I should have written: …between 87% and 97% of journalists [who donate to a political party] donate to Democratic or left wing political candidates.
Click to expand...
I’m glad you can acknowledge the mistake.

So, even if 87% of the journalists that donated money donated it Democrats, that really doesn’t mean anything if we don’t know what percentage of journalists donated money. If 80% did, then there might be meaning there. If 10% did, then very few journalists donated to Democrats and it the stat means almost nothing.
 
7_Sorrows said:
Many statements were bold faced lies as well.
Click to expand...
The boldest bold faced lie was when Cipollone claimed republicans were barred from the impeachment inquiry’s closed-door sessions. You know, the one several republicans were invited to and attended.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top