M
Maximus1
Guest
No idea what you are talking about. But it is not a rebuttal of evidence.
If even you know what’s in the notes, what’s the problem? And why didn’t Sondland testify to what is in them? And why didn’t the Dems act according to what they claim is their solemn duty and go to court to get them?And there are contemporanius notes showing it. Guess what! Trump ordered they not be produced. Wonder why? Lol
A shame for the Dems that not one of them actually had any facts to testify to except Sondland to whom Trump said there’s no quid pro quo.Can’t imagine a more powerful case with everyone in the Trump government telling the same story.
Citation, counselor? And how do you know they were “fully” testified to?Notes of a conversation fully testified to have no privilege attached.
Except he sure remembered that Trump denied there was a quid pro quo and that he wanted “nothing” in exchange for the money. He was as clear as clear gets on that. And yes, you can, like Schiff, pretend that you knew that both Trump and Sondland actually meant the opposite of what they said.Sondland testified he himself was denied the right to review his notes that he asked for and he could not be precise.
What a joke this is. The notes making a perjurer out of Sondland are so definitive as to Trump’s guilt that the Dems didn’t even bother to go to Court to get them, and decided to put on a 100% hearsay case instead in which the speculation of Trump opponents is taken for fact.That guys notes are wrongly withheld. There can be no privilege, their content is in the record. But the full statement is in them.
So
The records are hidden that show the no quid pro quo defense is a lie.
So, to be clear, you don’t believe Trump did anything wrong in attempting to extort Ukraine to investigate his political enemies by withholding funding earmarked by Congress and keeping the withholding a secret, but you believe that Biden “thwarted an investigation by having the prosecutor of his son’s company fired”. Basically, you ignore the overwhelming evidence pointing towards Trump’s guilt AND ignore the evidence that exonerates Biden.Oh, not at all. I claim Biden bragged on nationwide TV about thwarting an investigation into his son’s employer by getting the duly appointed prosecutor fired because I saw him do it myself. Now, he didn’t say “I’m thwarting an investigation into Burisma corruption”, he just did.
Yes, this is the sole reason the democrats have wanted this impeachment. We are in the final countdownOneSheep:![]()
No, the actual reason is:here are the other reasons why impeachment should take place:Emoluments (including that he has spent over 100 million of our taxes golfing at his own properties)Intimidation of witness Firing of ComeyObstruction (attempted) of the Russian investigationAttack on Iraq to appease Republican senators and possibly John Bolton (and all other AIPAC affiliates)Requesting a foreign government to do an investigation to discredit the Mueller
Use of campaign funds to buy the silence of mistresses Inciting violence, including the terrorist act in El Paso
HE
BEAT
HILLARY
It seems odd to me that saying this would be flag worthy, but people seem to have a free pass to make up whatever they want about Biden. I guess it shows who is doing the flagging.You might want to tone down your rhetoric.CallingvTrump a lawless crook is flag worthy imo and goes against forum guidelines for charitable posts
I feel sorry for Justice Roberts having to listen toHis Peak time demanding Americans attention will be over in 16 hours. Count down.
Unfortunately, our government has nothing to prevent a repeat performance.
We actually need to pray for Adam and others like him.
Adam, Nancy, Schumer, Nadler., etc, all need prayers.
We don’t live in Venezuela or Cuba or North Korea orThey are impeaching a lawless crook. That is their job