Impeachment of Donald J. Trump

  • Thread starter Thread starter dvdjs
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
If Satan wanted to be President, would abortion be a lost leader?) Once he had the one issue voters, he can always get them another way.
Intriguing.
I say simply there are many authentic or life candidates who are OTHERWIZE good men. He isn’t the only choice. So I don’t by the one issue voting. It is a beat your chest moment perhaps, while the guy leading it is impeached and he did it. Frankly, it bothers me that these are the circumstances. That the unborn get their DAY, as currency for one mans TV PLOY. EXACTLY the scenario of impeachment. All about him.
 
Last edited:
I will have to think about it. This has been my position for thirty years and I should think about it first.
 
It really goes beyond just the Dems.They have become an arm of the progressive left who for decades have been working on transforming this Nation.It was right within their grasp with what was thought to be a certain win by HC.They are apoplectic that Trump got in the way.
We should all be very concerned about this egregious abuse of power by the congress and all to whom they are beholding. That’s the real outrage!
 
Maximus1 said:
Well for you thank God for Russian propaganda putting the blame on Ukraine.
Click to expand...
Actually, the Ukrainian court that found election interference from Ukraine was anti-Russian. I have no idea what Putin said about it, if anything.
Maximus1 said:
You point to his March, pro life( ironically chosen to help himself in impeachment right at this moment in time. The exact point made by the Dems. )
Click to expand...
He didn’t choose the date. The March organization did. And, since he has been supporting the prolife cause in every other way, do you have any better reason to condemn him for appearing at the March?

Dem hatred for Trump long predated the impeachment. They hate him because he is emblematic of a segment of the population they hate and call things like “irredeemables”, “bitter clingers” “smelly Walmart shoppers”. That hatred is not lost on the objects of it, which is one of the reasons Clinton lost.

If Twain was alive today, he would probably poke fun at Trump’s mannerisms and outspokenness. But his real condemnation would be for the Dems who keep a whole segment of the population down, support the killing of children and promise everything but deliver nothing. Maybe a chapter entitled “Jim is enslaved again by the DNC”.
 
If you are talking about me, I gave you the shape of how the legal issue should be resolved. I am sorry a bit of study comes into play and I can’t cite a slogan in 5 work or less.
 
Ohh is that right!? Interesting because I and others here have been flagged numerous times for less offensive remarks about Dem politicians. If you are correct then in the future I won’t hold back re my feelings towards the clowns that are running this sham.Thanks for the clarification
 
Appreciate it. I am besieged on all sides. Voted most likely burned at the stake in my Catholic School yearbook. Lol
 
Clowns running sham is not flowery, but I wouldn’t think of turning a person in for it.
 
Jeanne_S said:
Ohh is that right!?
Click to expand...
I gave my perception of the rules and guidelines on charity.

It may be that posts are posts are seen as “incendiary”, or that they “incite animosty”. But my observation, FWIW, is that that there has been wide latitude given on the criticism of political figures.
 
What do you know of Trump? He was a Dem. He was pro choice to literally weeks before he had to change. What was the epiphany? Votes? Like Birther produced votes?
I have been listening to him for decades, I’ve been to Mara Lago. And more I won’t mention. He is a TV character to many. He was a guy who relieved himself on an actual golden toilet and I can promise you was an elitist. If anything his chip on his shoulder is that the real elitists didn’t accept him. Not that he didn’t desperately want to be accepted.
Mark Cuban had the most Cogent and concise statement about how his " peer billionaires" think of him.
Cuban said, " none of us can ever recall him making money for any of us."
Your Ukrainian interference must refer to " ANTI CURRUPTION" prosecutors disclosing Maniforts sordid deeds.
Read the accounts of Maniforts deeds. How his own kids wrote about his involvement in a massacre for political gain of his client. Their feelings about blood money.
That client was a Russian puppet. Who fled for Assylum given by Putin himself. Then was tryed and convicted of TREASON in UKRAINE.
Next gig…Donald Trump.
The prosecutors disclosure you write of was a prosecution of a PRO RUSSIAN PARTY. ( THE GUYS WHO INVADED THEM AND OCCUPIES A PIECE of their country roughly equivilent to Florida. )
Circumstances matter
 
Last edited:
Ridgerunner said:
No. I say Trump did not go far enough in demanding that Ukraine investigate both the Biden extortion and the 2016 Ukrainian interference in our election (which Ukrainian courts have already acknowledged).
Click to expand...
Of course not. There was no evidence that Biden did anything wrong and there was no evidence that there was Ukrainian interference in the election according to US intelligence agencies. What do you think Trump should have done besides extorting Ukraine by withholding funds earmarked by Congress?
Ridgerunner said:
No evidence exonerates Biden.
Click to expand...
Nevermind that it was US policy that Shokin needed to be removed, but it was also the EU, IMF and corruption minded Ukrainians that also wanted him removed. Nevermind that Biden did what he did publicly instead of hiding it in nearly inaccessible White House archive or holding back a whistleblower report from Congress. Yes, there certainly is evidence that exonerates Biden and the total lack of controversy at the time demonstrates how no one, including Republicans, had any issue with Biden’s actions.
Ridgerunner said:
You imply that my view of spiritual matters is colored by my politics, and yet you support abortionists politically because of yours? REally?
Click to expand...
I support the truth. I don’t invent falsehoods about politicians I don’t like and repeat them endlessly. I don’t make up what Popes said about ‘disqualifying’ Bernie Sanders and then not be able to back it up with a source.
Ridgerunner said:
I think today will be somewhat interesting as Trump is going to publicly manifest why the Dems hate him so much. He is going to actually speak in favor of life in the prolife march. The left media will be besides themselves with rage.
Click to expand...
It’s good that he does so and I hope he will talk about the importance of only having sexual relations within the marital bonds since six out of every seven abortions is performed on unmarried women, but there are some that will deny the obvious truth that there is a relationship between abortion and sex outside of wedlock.
 
drcube said:
Of course not.
Click to expand...
There is some merit to the idea that “Trump did not go far enough in demanding that Ukraine investigate …”
  1. Trump’s quids had a a very limited scope. he was not interested in corruption in Ukraine, just the Biden’s and the Crowdstrike-related theorizing.
  2. The manner of his approach to Ukraine - pack channels with private counsel, secretive conversations - was circumscribed in a very unusual fashion.
Of course, these aspects of Trump’s not going “far enough” present evidence of guilt and consciousness of guilt. Just like the obstruction.
 
I’m well aware that the Russians took Crimea and invaded eastern Ukraine when Obama was president. Your point about that is???

And I’m also aware that the Ukrainian court proceeding was anti-Russian. I said that myself.

Manafort’s deeds might have been as corrupt as Biden’s. But there’s no good reason to think Trump knew about them, whereas there is good reason to think Obama knew about Biden’s. And this country is in no danger of being governed by Manafort, whereas there is when it comes to Biden. As between the two, Biden is far and away the more serious threat.

That Yanukovich was a Russian agent would be difficult to deny. If he has been tried for it in Ukraine, it was in absentia because he has not returned to Ukraine since his ouster. There are, of course, those who maintain that he was merely an advocate of Ukraine joining the Russia trade group like Belarus and Kazakhstan instead of the EU. There are those who claim the EU manipulated his ouster. But it has always seemed more likely to me that he was not really a victim of the EU.
 
It doesn’t mean one thing.
But as with Pornography," I KNOW IT WHEN I SEE IT." WAS the SCOTUS LAW OF THE LAND for a while.
You can exert yourself arguing it is not confined to a simple definition but the response is the same. So what!
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top