Impeachment of Donald J. Trump

  • Thread starter Thread starter dvdjs
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Jeanne_S said:
The question is why do the Dems fear him so?they absolutely do!
Click to expand...
They fear him because he is bringing their corruption front and center for all to see. They don’t want to lose power and have their honey well dry up.
 
Russians had Stalin and he killed about 20 million. Yesterday someone showed me how his popularity is growing today over there.
What do I think about that?
Or
Right here, half the country actually chose Jefferson Davis over Lincoln.
What do I think of that?
Here is what I think. Electorates are often not great bodies of wisdom.
 
GOP had the executive, court and Senate. The GOP has power and honeywell pretty objectively
 
Maximus1 said:
Good. Let’s get it over with we agree. The truth comes out.
Click to expand...
What truth? What do you think Bolton is going to say that is being denied? And let the Bidens testify as well if we are going to go down the line of witnesses since they are center to the arguments the House made.
 
Maximus1 said:
GOP had the executive, court and Senate. The GOP has power and honeywell pretty objectively
Click to expand...
Not saying they don’t have the power. The President isn’t getting his money from a honey well though ais he? Honeywell being aka Ukraine, Haiti, etc., etc.,
 
Last edited:
I do fear the Biden’s. I cannot think of a single relevancy their testimony touches on. None has been articulated.
The only possible reason to put them on is to besmirch them because Joe is a candidate with a primary coming up. Under oath just besmirch him on TV. IF THERE WAS ANOTHER REASON relevant to the case, fine. I have heard none, except perhaps distraction and confusion.
 
Maximus1 said:
I do fear the Biden’s. I cannot think of a single relevancy their testimony touches on. None has been articulated.
Click to expand...
No reason? The entire House Managers case centered on the two of them. They made them central to the Presidents interest. That’s plenty reason right there! Democrats fear them testifying just like they fear the whistle blower testifying too. It’s pretty comical the House thinks they get to decide in every instance who can and can’t testify. At least Trump had a reason to challenge certain testimony.
 
Last edited:
You want him because he will put first hand knowledge into evidence of the drug deal.
Or he will totally dispell it, which is reason for an aquittal. A decision where he is hidden will be tainted. That isn’t good for the country in the long run.
 
Ok! I trust they make good decisions and horrible ones. Like Chattel slavery.
You do realize the American people chose Hillary in 16 I hope. Electors chose Trump. Say," I trust electors because I don’t trust the American people. That is consistent with Trump
 
Yes, I realize the people of California and NY chose Hillary. Personally I’m not a big fan of Hollywood.
 
Central to the president’s interest is not relevancy. Mina was central to Dracula’s interest.
Trump wanted dirt on his opponent, why reward him with an infomercial about his opponent when Biden cannot testify to a disputed issue.
This isn’t Hannity, or Levin, or the WWF. The threshold is relevancy and legal prejudice via confusion of issues. Like ,now we call a Sherpa, then a guy who sells pop corn at the movie. Or better Jim Acosta. Jim, why were you nasty to our beloved president. You don’t call witnesses to help forget why are we all here again.
That’s the great thing about trials. They have rules to avoid the circus.
 
Last edited:
I guess because lots of tax payers it is only fair to nullify their vote. Especially when someone in Oklahoma thinks their vote should count the same as 3-4 other tax payers.
 
Who knows what Trump does.
He said no business or potential business in Russia and he was negotiating for Trump Tower Moscow the whole campaign. The biggest deal of his life. Involving Putin’s needed blessing. So who can tell what he is doing
 
Maximus1 said:
I guess because lots of tax payers it is only fair to nullify their vote. Especially when someone in Oklahoma thinks their vote should count the same as 3-4 other tax payers.
Click to expand...
Is that your opinion?
 
Last edited:
Maximus1 said:
Central to the president’s interest is not relevancy.
Click to expand...
It’ absolutely is relevancy, the entire basis of the House’s claim is that they were of the Presidents interest. The entire argument on impeachment against Trump centers around them, corruption and investigating said parties.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top