Impeachment of Donald J. Trump

  • Thread starter Thread starter dvdjs
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
It would depend on what he said. If he said “Trump told me X” that would not be actionable unless it was an intentional lie uttered with malice. If he said “Trump told me Ukraine’s biggest military vulnerability is Y” then yes, I could see him getting into trouble with that. In any event, whether sworn or just said on tv, it’s the same.
Trump could solve all of this by releasing Bolton to testify, couldn’t he? Why doesn’t Trump just do it?
 
Trump waived privilege for the conversation. He can go on TV. QUESTION IS WHY DOESNT HE. LOTS of people in both parties are at stake
 
Last edited:
Bolton is an eye witness to Trump’s statement. The question is what precisely was said.
Here is my take.
Go read Trump’s tweet. Look at precisely what he denied. Lol
 
Bolton is a neo con and Hawk. Unapologetic, it is his belief. You like that or don’t.
He is not a " Clintonspeaker". He is a note taker. Precise. Playing around I see the qualities of Franz Leipkind from the Producers.
 
Trump waived privilege for the conversation. He can go on TV. QUESTION IS WHY DOESNT HE. LOTS of people in both parties are at stake
If he went on TV, people here would be saying what he said doesn’t matter because it wasn’t under oath.
 
You say Trump didn’t call him a liar. We can all read the tweet.
Trump said he didn’t tell Bolton " that"
He said Bolton is just trying to sell books.
You can parcel words, that message is an equivilent to lie.
So he didn’t say it was a lie. I didn’t think so.
One thing that actually matters is that Tweet waived privilege.
Your legal opinion might not be right.
Trump could solve all of this by releasing Bolton to testify, couldn’t he? Why doesn’t Trump just do it?
Why should he just because the Dems demand it? They actually want four witnesses, not just Bolton. And if one of the witnesses says something they want to follow up, they’ll demand yet more witnesses. The Dems want this to be endless so the public will pay for this aspect of their campaign.
He is not a " Clintonspeaker"
I never said he is or isn’t. I said the NYT recount is ambiguous as to what, exactly, Bolton knows versus what he simply thinks.
 
f he went on TV, people here would be saying what he said doesn’t matter because it wasn’t under oath.
I doubt that. But it sure could squelch book sales, which is probably why Bolton doesn’t do it.
 
Why should he just because the Dems demand it? They actually want four witnesses, not just Bolton. And if one of the witnesses says something they want to follow up, they’ll demand yet more witnesses. The Dems want this to be endless so the public will pay for this aspect of their campaign.
The Democrats want witnesses with first hand knowledge to bolster their case. Of course, they also could exonerate Trump. I wonder why Trump doesn’t want them to testify then?
I doubt that. But it sure could squelch book sales, which is probably why Bolton doesn’t do it.
Oh, you know the lengths Trump supporters will go to in weak attempts to excuse his poor, immoral, unethical and illegal behavior. They would definitely claim that Bolton is lying.
 
Typical of Democrats spewing their venom at Trump and those who support him.
Trump supporters have no credibility whatsoever in expressing touchiness over unflattering nicknames.
People who voted for Trump and support him need to realize it’s not Trump himself that the Party of Abortion despises; it’s them. The “irredeemables”, “bitter clingers”, “smelly Walmart shoppers”.
That’s what you try to sell, even though it requires twisting words falsely.
The VP is the replacement. He is authentically pro life
This obvious, but important fact, totally undercuts the utterly bogus “overturning the 2016 election” meme.
 
The Democrats want witnesses with first hand knowledge to bolster their case. Of course, they also could exonerate Trump. I wonder why Trump doesn’t want them to testify then?
I really do doubt the Dems think Bolton is going to do anything other than criticize Trump generally. Why would Trump want that or an endless demand for more and more witnesses?
Oh, you know the lengths Trump supporters will go to in weak attempts to excuse his poor, immoral, unethical and illegal behavior. They would definitely claim that Bolton is lying.
Do I? It is interesting how Democrats never tire of attacking Trump voters and supporters. “Deplorables”, “irredeemables”, “bitter clingers”, “smelly Walmart shoppers”. Your leaders do reflect your attitudes. One has to admit that.
 
All this conjecture about Bolton and what he knew, might reveal, or whether or not he may be telling the truth, is a waste of paper. After Professor Derschowitz’s presentation yesterday, I don’t foresee that the Senate will approve further witnesses. Their case is strong enough - they don’t have to delve any further into this sidestep. Bolton’s revelation does not amount to an impeachable offense, whether or not he is telling the truth.

Talk about perfect timing … Bolton’s announcement came too late, for Derschowitz had already laid the groundwork in the Senate, stating the parameters for impeachable matters, and Bolton’s bullet misses the mark completely.
 
Last edited:
Quoting. an. article. That’s not something I would normally say. I didn’t even know it was a thing.
Oh no, mommy. Tommy said it. I was just repeating it.
I am neither a fool nor a fake prolife person and am insulted that you would say so. You’ve crossed the line and I’ll not be responding to you anymore.
I didn’t say you are. I said a person who would replace him with a person more abortionist than Obama would be fake prolife or a fool.

Why did you think I was talking about you?

But don’t respond if you don’t want to.
 
It is interesting how Democrats never tire of attacking Trump voters and supporters. “Deplorables”, “irredeemables”, “bitter clingers”, “smelly Walmart shoppers”. Your leaders do reflect your attitudes. One has to admit that.
Again with the phony, trumped up claims.
Derschowitz had already laid the groundwork in the Senate, stating the parameters for impeachable matters,
Parameters that he alone holds. And maybe the OJ jury.
Oh no, mommy. Tommy said it. I was just repeating it.
Hilarious from a supporter of the the president who so frequently says" That what I’ve heard" “That’s what people are saying”, etc. 🤣
 
I really do doubt the Dems think Bolton is going to do anything other than criticize Trump generally. Why would Trump want that or an endless demand for more and more witnesses?
Bolton was named by other witnesses as being in more direct contact with Trump and can explain if Trump was extorting the Ukrainian government. So, it makes sense that Trump would want Bolton to testify UNLESS he was extorting the Ukrainian government.
Do I? It is interesting how Democrats never tire of attacking Trump voters and supporters. “Deplorables”, “irredeemables”, “bitter clingers”, “smelly Walmart shoppers”. Your leaders do reflect your attitudes. One has to admit that.
Do these leaders feel this way? Do this comments reflect my attitudes? I don’t think I have ever called anyone ‘deplorable’, ‘irredeemable’, ‘bitter clinger’ or ‘smelly Walmart shopper’. In fact, it is you that repeat this over and over again, claiming that they reflect the views of all Democrats. This is an excellent example of the lengths that Trump supporters will go in weak attempts to excuse his poor, immoral, unethical and illegal behavior.
 
I wonder if calling the entire episode a DRUG DEAL gives insight into what Bolton will say
 
This is an excellent example of the lengths that Trump supporters will go in weak attempts to excuse his poor, immoral, unethical and illegal behavior.
Huh? Trump supporters do as you conclude? What an appalling judgment on others’ souls and motives. I hope you watch the news this evening. He met today with Israel’s leader and announced a wonderful deal that is beyond anything I might have imagined for their country. The applause on every other sentence was thunderous, and in one instance, received a standing ovation with unending applause. What a wonderful foreign policy and negotiation he set in motion. Think again before you publicize your interpretation of his supporters.
 
Last edited:
Bolton was named by other witnesses as being in more direct contact with Trump and can explain if Trump was extorting the Ukrainian government. So, it makes sense that Trump would want Bolton to testify UNLESS he was extorting the Ukrainian government.

(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.) Ridgerunner:
Not at all. What you’re saying is that other “witnesses” said “well, Bolton might know something”. And trump has more reason than that to oppose his testifying. I think the Dems know Bolton has nothing really relevant to say, but has plenty of criticism of Trump in other ways. Trump doesn’t want to stretch this out for the sake of testimony that doesn’t even seem to be there.
Do these leaders feel this way?
If they didn’t, they wouldn’t say things like that. My use of “your” was generic, as in “Democrat”.
the lengths that Trump supporters will go in weak attempts to excuse his poor, immoral, unethical and illegal behavior.
Couldn’t help yourself. Case closed.
 
It doesn’t prove anything. Trump had every legal authority to call for things to be looked into. Ukraine can’t investigate Joe Biden. This was always about corruption. Trump also has every legal right to delay aid, it happens all the time. He also has a right to say he’s going to Article 3 on certain subpoenas (SC has ruled on this), also legal right. None of the two articles the Dems have charged against Trump even if all their claims were true aren’t of any constitutional impeachment weight. The Dems have a terrible non-case that would never even be able to be prosecuted in any legal court in the US. It’s a farce.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top