P
PrayforMallory
Guest
Martin Luther? They hold totally different premises though. Most “Orthodox” Catholics would be closer to Luther.Why do you say the ordinations were legal?
He did *not *have the Papal approvals, all the while the Pope was constantly asking him not to do this and(as a last resort) threatened him with excommunication if he did. And, of course, he followed through. There was no “necessity” by his own words.
It has always been Tradition with a capital T to obey the Pope.
Pope Pius V in his papal bull declared that nothing be added or removed. This is where confusion started.
In reading about the Popes of old, Pius V evidently didn’t mean that his successors, whose authority was the same as his, could not revise it. Just as he himself altered the Missal when he added the feast of Our Lady of the Rosary the following year. And in 1585, Pope Sixtus restored the feast of the Presentation of the Virgin Mary, which Pius V had removed. And only 34 years after that Pope Clement V111 made a general revision of the Roman Missal, as did Pope Urban V111 30 years later.
I.m sorry if I offend anyone, that is not my intention. But I feel this is just Martin Luther all over again. If you admire Lefebvre, you gotta admire Luther…
(I forget the name of the book, but it was about all the Popes, I got from the Library. (BIG book))
If we are to stick to tradition, we have to obey the Pope. He is the Vicar of Christ on earth. Mary told the people at Cana…“do what He tells you to do”…This alone should be enough.
If Jesus is unhappy with the '“Vatican” and the NO or the TLM, He will correct it, He really doesn’t need our help. When we try “helping”, we usually just screw things up. (look what we did in the Garden of Eden)
Step Back, “do what He tells you”, and let God be God.![]()
Or at least, so the SSPX claims.
Was St. Athanasius a proto-Martin Luther?