T
Teelynn
Guest
I AM Catholic, a (what you would call) Cradle Catholic. But I stand pretty much where you stand on this. Give him the benefit of the doubt that he was reaching out to non Catholics and even non Christians. That said I am hoping, however, that he has noticed that within his own Church the pews are not very full at the moment. Within evangelization there is a great need to ‘re evangelize’ the flock. Lots of Catholics that no longer believe that it’s necessary to go to Mass on Sunday. No longer necessary to support the Church. They may go when the mood strikes them, maybe on Christmas and Easter, or then again, maybe not, doesn’t matter, they’ve bought the lie that they will end up in heaven anyway, or maybe they were never taught true Catholicism to begin with. Maybe it was all the watered down Catholicism since Vat ll…‘let the fresh air in’, relax and do what you want, the Lord is all LOVE AND MERCY, no need for any of those old archaic ‘rules.’ What I think may be dangerous, is the ‘live and let live’ mentality that the Holy Father seems to be reinforcing since Vat ll. He may be doing that for ecumenism, but Catholics need to hear they have an obligation to be faithful to Christ in His One Holy Catholic Apostolic Church. I do believe he has sort of alluded to that once, with his ‘No Church, No Jesus’ homily. He needs to do a lot more of that and encourage his own flock in his own Church. Maybe that’s coming…wait and pray. Pray for the Holy Father.I’m not Catholic but I deeply respect Catholicism and Pope Francis. It appears to me that he has brought a simple and genuine approach to the faith without a lot of bells and whistles.
I presume that his Top 10 Secrets to Happiness list was meant for a wider audience than just Catholics since he doesn’t touch much on God or the Catholic faith and he emphasizes to not proselytize.
A possible secondary motive may have been to plant a seed of evangelization in the hearts and minds of those with little or no faith who have a secular mindset.
Perhaps he thought that if they listened to him on the topic of happiness, they might listen to other things that he has to say in the future when it comes to faith and morals.
Perhaps – If he had used a lot of religious language – it may not have been as effective.
In short, I think he was reaching out in evangelization to the secular community and used his words accordingly so they could relate to him. If I were a Catholic, I’d give him the benefit of the doubt.