Indiana's bishops lament court decision on marriage [CC]

  • Thread starter Thread starter Catholic_Press
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
C

Catholic_Press

Guest
The bishops of Indiana have decried a federal court decision that struck down the state’s marriage law."The Church upholds the dignity and sanctity of marriage as a natural union …

More…
 
This is all posturing by the activist lower courts trying to force the supreme court to rule in their favor where this will inevitably will end up. They figure “strength in numbers”

Notice this battle is being fought in the most unusual places. Utah, Idaho, Indiana…

There is a reason for that.
 
This is all posturing by the activist lower courts trying to force the supreme court to rule in their favor where this will inevitably will end up. They figure “strength in numbers”

Notice this battle is being fought in the most unusual places. Utah, Idaho, Indiana…

There is a reason for that.
What are Utah, Idaho, and Indiana unusual?
 
What are Utah, Idaho, and Indiana unusual?
This battle is being fought on stronghold fronts. California is liberal, and prop 8 was passed. One could see where some homosexual activists blamed Mormon influence from Utah. Utah has interesting marriage history as well with the issue of polygamy. Idaho recently had it’s laws against gay “Marriage” overturned. Some of the most conservative states with the majority of the public against gay marriage are the ones being forced to recognize the “marriages”.
 
This battle is being fought on stronghold fronts. California is liberal, and prop 8 was passed. One could see where some homosexual activists blamed Mormon influence from Utah. Utah has interesting marriage history as well with the issue of polygamy. Idaho recently had it’s laws against gay “Marriage” overturned. Some of the most conservative states with the majority of the public against gay marriage are the ones being forced to recognize the “marriages”.
Ah, I see. If I know Indiana, they will probably pass a bill that says that they won’t enforce the federal government’s decision. They were going to do that with regards to the Second Amendment after Obama threatened executive orders after Sandy Hook.
 
Ah, I see. If I know Indiana, they will probably pass a bill that says that they won’t enforce the federal government’s decision. They were going to do that with regards to the Second Amendment after Obama threatened executive orders after Sandy Hook.
One would hope. But I’d settle for fluoride in the water and some sort of law against tattoos.😃
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top