I was raised in the Catholic Church and I attend my parish. However I have some difficulties to accept the Catholic teaching. Especially I don’t believe in the indulgences.
Do you think that I am still a Catholic?
I was raised in the Catholic Church and I attend my parish. However I have some difficulties to accept the Catholic teaching. Especially I don’t believe in the indulgences.
Do you think that I am still a Catholic?
Here is what I, most definitely not a Catholic, understand about indulgences and how they work. Please bear with me, and any Catholic who sees me go off the rails here PLEASE correct me.
Catholics have a concept called “Purgatory,” where people who are actually
already headed for Heaven need some spiritual rough edges knocked off; a sort of training/proving ground, where the person undergoes…something (I get varied information about this one)…that
is meant to get them prepared to enter the presence of God. Some have called it punishment…
I don’t know if that’s the right word, since prayers for the inhabitants of Purgatory may shorten their stay.
The final judgment is about the totality of one’s life, all the actions, all the good and evil one does; everything…a weighing in the balance of all good (including repentance and contrition) against sin.
Indulgences, then, are those acts of contrition and intercessory prayers by oneself and others which aid those who are in Purgatory (and who are here, for that matter.) They may be performed by the sinner prior to sinning, even.
The point is the motive: an indulgence is the result of something that must be done for the right reason; not to get oneself out of trouble, or in purposeful preparation for a planned sin, but…because it needs to be done. Donations of money may get an indulgence (which, I understand, is kept track of in Heaven, not here…) but only if that donation is made for the right reasons; not to get out of trouble, but to aid whatever purpose the donation will serve.
The idea, I understand, is that good deeds balance out…not sin, which is taken care of through confession, but the ordinary consequences of that sin.
I’m saying this badly. Sorry.
The POINT is, Luther wasn’t upset about indulgences. He was upset about the way the concept was being misused; one cannot SELL them; they just don’t work that way.
Perhaps one analogy is the very earthly idea of a parole. One of the requirements for getting one, in today’s prison system, is that the felon actually admit guilt and show remorse/rehabilitiation through behavior that shows a change in character and ability to behave. THEN he might get out early, but if he isn’t remorseful, or fails to admit guilt, any hope of early release is impossible. An indulgence, like a parole, only works after the sinner has confessed and been forgiven for the sin already. It does not give anybody freedom TO sin, nor does it ‘pay for’ sin. Christ did that.
In other very confusing words, I don’t see any problem with the Catholic idea of indulgences; it works very well with the idea of Purgatory, and actually makes sense. It is the abuses of the idea that caused problems, not the actual notion of them.