wagchewy:
i was not able to locate the supposed era of your fish(as it was primarily aquatic) or that they were found below any T-Rex bones in your article.
See
The Geologic Time Scale for the geological eras.
Acanthostega is one of the Devonian amphibians. Here āDevonianā is the name of one of the standard geological periods, from 408 million years ago to 354 million years ago. T. rex cames from the Cretaceous period, 250 million years ago to 65 million years ago. There is no example of any one of the various Devonian amphibians appearing after the Devonian. There is no example of any dinosaur appearing in the Devonian. There is no mixing whatsoever. Not one of those amphibians survived in the flood longer than even a dead dinosaur. No dinosaur bones are mixed in with the Devonian amphibians. Can you explain how a dead dinosaur can swin better than a live amphibian?
wagchewy:
how can EVERY cycad(as you claim above) be below EVERY oak tree when both plants still exist today? I would love to see your source on that one!
I am aware that cycads exist today, which is why I said āalmostā when talking about oak trees and cycads. Much of the coal found in Carboniferous, 354 mya to 290 mya, originated from cycads. There are millions of tons of cycads in Carboniferous rocks yet not one oak tree. I find it difficult to believe such perfect sorting from a chaotic event like a sudden worldwide flood.
wagchewy:
as for farm animalsā¦ that is an interesting ideaā¦ i donāt know but it could be that since nothing had been dead long enough for sediment to turn to rock then maybe they got washed away with the top layer of soil and are too scattered to find?
Well done, you are the first Creationist to try to answer my questions on this. Certainly a flood on the scale proposed would wash away vast quantities of topsoil and animal bones. Larger items like bones would sink rapidly to the bottom so we would expect to find the bones of all kinds of animals which had died before the flood mixed up together. We do not find this.
All non-avian dinosaur bones are found in Triassic, Jurassic and Cretaceous rocks.
All cow and sheep bones are found after the Cretaceous. Not a single bone is out of place. Do dinosaur bones swim less well than mammal bones?
wagchewy:
huge wall of water that destroyed everything would make it hard to find anything āman madeā from before the flood.
How about bits of tile or bricks? Fragments of pottery? Small bits of broken metal? All of these human produced artifacts would have been swept away by the flood and mixed in with the animal bones. Can a potsherd swim better than a live amphibian? Is a dinosaur bone harder and more durable than a bronze knife? We find amphibian and dinosaur bones but we donāt find potsherds or bronze knives.
wagchewy:
easier than an eyeball could have formed in one evolutionary step
I agree. Unfortunately for your argument, the human eye did not form in āone evolutionary stepā but in very many tiny evolutionary steps. What is improbable in one single mighty leap can be achieved by a large number of much smaller (and hence less improbable) steps. Half an eye is 1% more useful than 49% of an eye; that is the way that our eyes evolved.
wagchewy:
before you politly call me stupid for my idea again
You are not stupid, you are obviously trying to think things through for yourself which is a very good thing to do. Unfortunately you seem to be using too many Creationist sources which are not always scientifically reliable. You would do well to check everything for yourself first.
wagchewy:
then explain it to me SLOWLY.
For a good introduction to evolution try
Understanding Evolution.
rossum
