Interfaith: a new dialogue between Muslims and Catholic

  • Thread starter Thread starter men0wjv
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
So ‘Meno’,

Are you of Middle Eastern descent? Or are you of European descent who is drawn to Islam?

Do you know of the canon of Scripture? That Catholics and Protestants do not use the same translations of the Bible? The Catholic Church does not accept the Gospel of St. Thomas…it does not benefit the universality of Catholic faith. There is an off branch in the Far East, Nestorianism…
 
So ‘Meno’,

Are you of Middle Eastern descent? Or are you of European descent who is drawn to Islam?
Do you know of the canon of Scripture? That Catholics and Protestants do not use the same translations of the Bible? The Catholic Church does not accept the Gospel of St. Thomas…it does not benefit the universality of Catholic faith. There is an off branch in the Far East, Nestorianism…
My dad traced my family tree all the way back to Oliver Cromwell’s time (1665), its pretty hard to go further than that because it wasn’t until this time the Cromwell passed a law saying that all births deaths and marriages had to be written in a bound book. Before then it was just written on parchment that could have gone anywhere. There was a Voller that cam over in 1066, maybe that was a relation or my forefathers Landlord? SO I’m about as English as they come.
I have read a little bit into the forming of the Canon, interesting stuff. I do remember reading about Nestorianism in a book on historical theology, but I can’t remember the particulars. There was an interesting point made on a BBC documentary of an Eastern Church that thrived all the way to China, no virtually no evidence remains today. All fascinating stuff 🙂
 
Thanks for clarifying…because in your mentality I saw effects of Judeo Christian values!!!..which I see in moderate Muslims in Europe…but more so in you. Also in part with your use of English. (I was in grad school briefly in Linguistics…and always pick up on people’s use of language with thought.)

Cromwell was indeed a persecutor of us, but you certainly did not inherit any of that.

You should check out Catholic social doctrine. We are having a middle class revolt here because we want business to be free…and all the helps given are not helping business but creating more entitlements and waste of money and character of the human being to think and use their time properly and not be dependent on welfare. I am not talking about those who are innocent, but those in vice.

What I am reacting to in this country is the Muslim Brotherhood and CAIR…this latter the one suing anybody for anything to impose Islam and create a subordinate fear towards Islam by us who refuse to submit to it. We are also very angry at this organization. There is a book out called, ‘Muslim Mafia: Inside Secret Underworld that Conspires to Islamize America’. An American infiltrated this organization, exposed the Foundation to the Holy Land, which actually was a front for terrorism, particularly Hamas.

We cannot denigrate Israel, but we can in its particular treatment of the Palestinians, be they Muslim or Christian. We were told from Scripture that the Jews would some day return to their land. But as my pastor said, if they attempt to rebuild the Temple, it is something he hopes will not happen, because then things will become very bad.

We receive the Sacred Word of God Who is Jesus Christ Incarnate. Catholicism is the fulfillment of Judaism and America does not have the anti-semitism you see in parts of Europe.

About the economics of the free market and Sharia…what little I know of right now…I would agree with you. But I am also reading about the issue of women rights in marriage and property, witness, inheritance. Then there is the other issue of the discrimination against non-Muslims. And finally, the intent by the more ideological to be on the slippery slope with Sharia…move it into the culture one step at a time.

As Catholics, we are free to choose a form of government best for us. I believe the American constitution, the idea of a republic – to off set a misdirected majority vote --, the free market, and a dominant but separate/private moral voice (church/synagogue/mosque/humanitarian) have freedom to uphold public morals.

The problem here is that our education and entertainment industry has been corrupted by either Far Left or anti-religion hedonists. We are powerless at present to do anything about the proliferation of pornography and the subsequent effect of abuse against women, the sex slave trade in human trafficking, the massive amount of children sex abuse in our culture, and the unwanted conception of human beings from free sex, as well as the divorce culture vs the permanency of marriage.

The Catholic social doctrine addresses the moral needs of government --whatever form, the dignity of the human being, a strong moral voice in the free market. The Church condemns liberalism and communism and forms of socialism that attempt to replace our dependency on God for a select group of people.

You should get hold of John Paul II’s ‘Centesimus Annus’. You can download it from the Vatican site.

God bless you, ‘Meno’, on your search for truth and righteousness.
 
God bless you, ‘Meno’, on your search for truth and righteousness.
Thanks and God bless you 🙂 Its part of my faith to seek truth wherever I find it, after all we see truth as Divine, one of God’s attributes is Al Haqq (All Truth). As Muhammad (pbuh) said: "Wisdom is the lost property of the believer, he should pursue it even if finds it in the mouth of an unbeliever."*
Thanks for clarifying…because in your mentality I saw effects of Judeo Christian values!!!..which I see in moderate Muslims in Europe…but more so in you. Also in part with your use of English. (I was in grad school briefly in Linguistics…and always pick up on people’s use of language with thought.)
People are the product of their environment :). I’m glad for my upbringing, even the Christian values of my local Anglican vicar at school - he was the great grand son of Charles Dickens. Over the last 10 years in my Islamic education I have had a ‘clear out’ of un-Islamic beliefs, practices and characteristics, I’ve kept many from my Christian influences because they are congruent with Islam. Like I said Judeo Christian by definition also includes Islam.
You may have seen some angry Middle Eastern Muslims, I wouldn’t say that was typical, ask Benedict on this thread; Iraqi’s are a really lovely people. Like I said, people are the product of their environment, in the Muslim World, modernity was forced upon them and it coincided with brutal purging of their religion (we are going through a reformation) and often by a foreign aggressor. As such Muslims may have certain baggage that we as people who have grown in a place where modernity grew up organically, find difficult to understand. That said, I would say one of the biggest pulling powers to Islam is the smiley countenance of Muslims and their generous hospitality - one of my teachers when in Egypt: had been traveling a great distance and was looking a bit disheveled, a woman forced money into his hand as she walked by! When I think of Muslims fighting, I think of them fighting to be the one that pays for the meal 🙂
Cromwell was indeed a persecutor of us, but you certainly did not inherit any of that.
We have parts in British history of gruesome and unforgivable oppression of Catholics. I am happy to stand shoulder to shoulder with you guys to correct the unfair bigotry that many Brits still harbour towards your faith - simply because their assumptions aren’t true and are unjust. Funnily enough Cromwell, after a failed attempt to implement a Republic Protestant/Puritan ideology in the UK, decided to appoint Charles II (a Catholic) King to bring back order; ‘Catholicism may not be the truth, but at least it isn’t madness!’
You should check out Catholic social doctrine… You should get hold of John Paul II’s ‘Centesimus Annus’. You can download it from the Vatican site.
Will do 🙂
What I am reacting to in this country is the Muslim Brotherhood and CAIR…this latter the one suing anybody for anything to impose Islam
They are not imposing Islam, because that requires respect. We can work together on this one too 🙂
About the economics of the free market and Sharia…what little I know of right now…I would agree with you. But I am also reading about the issue of women rights in marriage and property, witness, inheritance. Then there is the other issue of the discrimination against non-Muslims. And finally, the intent by the more ideological to be on the slippery slope with Sharia…move it into the culture one step at a time.
There is so much that could be said here, I’m afraid that I do not have the time right at this minute, God willing I’ll return to it. Suffice to say that the objectives of the Shariah are to preserve: religion (btw not just Islam), life, intellect, lineage/honour, and wealth. We can talk more about the individual rulings and their rights/wrongs but we can see that the main objectives are completely reasonable. The BBC website is excellent for anything - its the BBC’s constitution to provide objective journalism with the public’s best interests in mind - check out this for a really good overview of Shariah Law: bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/islam/beliefs/sharia_1.shtml
 
As Catholics, we are free to choose a form of government best for us…
Many Muslims are ignorant of the fact that the Ahkam us Sultaniyyah (Ordinances of Government) are very open. Acts of worship have many detailed scriptural evidence and are very prescriptive, as is the theology. As a result those that never progress beyond a basic understanding are ignorant of the fact that scriptural sources towards government are few and are broad - this is not out of forgetfulness, but to allow flexibility. This part of the Shariah is really interesting and open to debate and so perhaps Muslims should spend less time arguing about where their hands should be during prayer and more time in comparing modern forms of government with that of Classical Islam.
The problem here is that our education and entertainment industry has been corrupted by either Far Left or anti-religion hedonists. We are powerless at present to do anything about the proliferation of pornography and the subsequent effect of abuse against women, the sex slave trade in human trafficking, the massive amount of children sex abuse in our culture, and the unwanted conception of human beings from free sex, as well as the divorce culture vs the permanency of marriage.
We can work together to correct these 🙂

Which books are you reading? Careful, in this media hyped climate there is a lot of drivel out there, to make money. My rule of thumb is stick to Oxford or Cambridge published works and you can’t go far wrong. I also think One World Publications have some really great books written by authoritative scholars on all facets of the various religions.

Pax vobiscum 🙂
 
Thanks, Men0, you have really given me insight into some aspects of everyday Muslims. We do not see the hospitality in every day life. The Muslim Brotherhood is the one that is affecting our lives here.

Charles Dickens is among my most favored writers…I worked among colonial British in Africa and did see alot of bigotry towards my Italian Catholic priest friends…I met some Catholic English women in Portugal and they were awesome. We see a very small number of English Catholics who are exemplary and really stand out in their witness. The more I read the history of England and see the witness of faithful Catholics who have endured, greatly moves me.

I will come back to your comments later…but how many Muslims of Middle Eastern descent and who are British, have the same scope or perspective of non-Muslims like you? How are you able to communicate to them as you do to us?

I was in a class with the diocese. There was a small group of us. We did a little reflection on how we view ourselves. One image came up and that was being a Christian to him was being like a bridge…connecting different people to each other.

You are like a bridge. Some say Mary is like a bridge connecting humanity with the Lord.
I have a Muslim-Catholic friend here at CAF who lives in Australia. He goes between mosque and parish, speaks to the local bishop and imam.

We need people like you!
 
Pax vobiscum,

From Nostra Aetate urged both of us to: work sincerely for mutual understanding and to preserve as well as to promote together for the benefit of all mankind social justice and moral welfare, as well as peace and freedom.

There has been some good work since 1965, but we still are somewhat estranged. I wish to ask: what is it, that acts as a barrier for mutual understanding and promote benefit for all mankind?

From an inter-faith meeting, I was surprised when a really splendid Catholic said, I was the first Muslim he’d met who hadn’t tried to convert him. This shows a rather arrogant and disrespectful attitude from some of my brethren which is a shame and will do nothing for mutual understanding. Maybe this attitude is more prevalent amongst Muslims?

Firstly we need to put our egos aside for this endeavor to work, so let us make this thread full of respect; asking and listening with aim to find out more rather than pin some agenda on the other group no matter all credible evidence pointing to the contrary.

Dominus vobiscum
Dear men0wjv,

While I am no longer loyal to Rome (so Nostra Aetate is of no consequence to me), you raise some good points in this and subsequent posts.However, as in our last interaction some time ago, I must say that there are some rose-colored glasses being worn here. How much “understanding” is possible between people with completely different ways of viewing the world, and hence what it could mean to “benefit all mankind”, work towards “social justice”, and all the other platitudes offered in that quote? And how much “understanding” would be required before we could come to any kind of agreement? I say for myself that my Christian friends from the Middle East know Islam much better than either you or I, having lived under it for century upon century, and continuing to live under its shadow. There is no amount of further “understanding” that is needed from those most directly affected by the supposed aberrations of Islamic doctrine at the hands of the terrorists. It is merely a nightmare that replays itself over and over today across the world as it did yesterday in many of those same places.

To be blunt: You’re a nice guy, but why on earth is “mutual understanding” even assumed to be possible, let alone the key to advancing some sort of shared Christian-Muslim vision of a just society in the absence of any sort of indication that we there is such a vision to be pursued in the first place, and many, many, many examples to the contrary?
 
Thanks, ‘Men0’…just one last question again, and Dzheremi brings up what I have been reading about most of the time, and why I was very happy to hear of your experience of the hospitality of Muslims…because I always thought it was basically extended only among themselves.

For the Muslims who live in Great Britain, but are from a Middle Eastern heritage, how many of them share your same perspective?

Do they see England merely as a good place to live in for money and material well being or do they also wish to form bridges?
 
Dzheremi 👍 Why hello there my friend, its been a while. Your last post seems a little pessimistic, like you’re feel a little down, you ok? 🙂 No longer loyal to Rome? We had a pretty deep conversation about authority and anyone has to agree Roman Catholicism has that, so why the change? (BTW I ask out of concern as apposed for any other reason :))

Kathleen and Dzheremi thanks for the posts, if I understand you correctly you seem skeptical that Arabs and by extension Muslims are gracious hosts to non Muslims and that mutual understanding seems ultimately futile.

I would say Arabs and the rest of the Muslims are of the most hospitable in the whole World. For example when my wife was traveling the Sahara (she was non-Muslim at the time) and came into difficulty when her Land Rover broke down, went looking for aid. She came to a village and ask the people there for help fixing the car. They didn’t just do that, but invited her in and gave her everything they had and they were very poor. They would share great plates of cous-cous and the family would push the meat to her (i.e. the best bit), she was vegetarian at the time, but didn’t have the heart to refuse them :). She was profoundly touched. OK this is just one example, but it is not uncommon, perhaps the best amongst us, the hero Benedict, could shed light on the Iraqi’s? If find Iraqi’s really lovely people, in fact all Gulf Arabs… maybe except for some Saudi’s, but then they are Salafi. It is true that there is a special bond between Muslims, but that doesn’t mean Muslims are not loving to the rest of humanity. I love my people and the Brits are friendly enough, but its not the same as Arab hospitality. One funny thing I came across was a Patan (from Afghanistan) man told me that in their culture its an unwritten rule that if your enemy comes to your house fleeing his enemies, it is mandatory to fight with him and once his enemies are defeated then feed him and give him shelter for the night. Once he’s been treated like a King then in the morning you say go because we are still enemies and the next time I’ll see you I’ll kill you 🙂

Its not all roses of course, you’ll get exceptions to every rule, but generally I would say most Middle Eastern’s have kept that side of hospitality and generosity that perhaps we have lost here in the West. They are people too and so have the same sort of hang ups as non-Muslims towards them. They may perceive you as strange because they have never set foot in a Church or know any Christians etc Just in the same way you may never have been to a Mosque or know any Muslims. All they may know about Christians is that they have dodgy theology (relative to Islam) and that they descended unprovoked in hordes from the West killing indiscriminately and even eating their victims (re: the Crusades). You can’t love someone until you know them.

You think I’m a nice guy (thanks btw) but why is that? Because I understand both sides. We fear what we don’t understand. At the end of the day all people are an individual revelation a unique self disclosure of God. By understanding other peoples you are in fact understanding more about God. It maybe that they are unpleasant or heretical but then that makes one stronger in their own faith; you only know something through its opposites. Once you see an unbeliever doing something beautiful, something better than you then you are moved to tears, how can someone on falsehood be better than I? God’s love which is what is keeping the whole cosmos in motion pervades all, even the most bigoted fool. Should one look for the Divine in everyone they meet then they’ll see it and whilst darkness may also be there it doesn’t truly exist; it is only the absence of light. The Hand that made me, made you and for our shared Creator should we not show some solidarity? If He can tolerate our heresy, why shouldn’t we?

I may have rose tinted classes? You may have blue tinted glasses? I don’t know, but what I can say about religion in general and Ahul Sunnah wal Jamat (i.e. Islam) and Catholicism in particular is that in their tradition they promote mutual understanding. Muslims or Christians may go wrong now and then, but their religion - unlike post modernism - has the tools to highlight this wrong path that they’ve taken and direct them back to the straight and narrow… no the straight and broad.

I wish to finish on something beautiful:
Lord, make me an instrument of your peace.
Where there is hatred, let me sow love.
Where there is injury, pardon.
Where there is doubt, faith.
Where there is despair, hope.
Where there is darkness, light.
Where there is sadness, joy.
O Divine Master,
grant that I may not so much seek to be consoled, as to console;
to be understood, as to understand;
to be loved, as to love.
For it is in giving that we receive.
It is in pardoning that we are pardoned,
and it is in dying that we are born to Eternal Life.
Amen.
 
Greetings and peace be with you menOwjv; I wish to finish on something beautiful also:

The Messenger of Allah (pbuh) said, “Shall I inform you of the best morals of this world and the hereafter?

They are to forgive he who oppresses you, to make a bond with he who severs from you, to be kind to he who insults you, and to give to he who deprives you.

Blessings

Eric
 
Dzheremi 👍 Why hello there my friend, its been a while. Your last post seems a little pessimistic, like you’re feel a little down, you ok? 🙂 No longer loyal to Rome? We had a pretty deep conversation about authority and anyone has to agree Roman Catholicism has that, so why the change? (BTW I ask out of concern as apposed for any other reason :))
Down? Not in general. Down about the prospects for Christian-Muslim engagement on equally acceptable terms, sure. That hasn’t changed, my friend. And, yes, no longer loyal to Rome. Sure, it has authority, but it is of a different kind than what is claimed by the other apostolic communions. But that is another topic, not really related to this one.
Kathleen and Dzheremi thanks for the posts, if I understand you correctly you seem skeptical that Arabs and by extension Muslims are gracious hosts to non Muslims and that mutual understanding seems ultimately futile.
My post had nothing to do with who is or can be a gracious host. You must be referring to Kathleen here, because I have no shortage of personal experience with Arab hospitality, and found it if anything a little overwhelming. I mean that in a good way, of course. 🙂
…in fact all Gulf Arabs… maybe except for some Saudi’s, but then they are Salafi.
Hahaha. Would you believe that the majority of my Arab acquaintances over the past three years ago were Saudis, and they were among the most kind? Yes, there are certain groups among them who were very cold, stern, and overall not the kind of people I would choose to associate with (maybe these were the “Salafis”; I don’t know), but in my admittedly limited personal experience, the stereotype about Saudis is at least a bit overstated. (This could be the result of the moderating effect of the world outside of KSA, however.)
I may have rose tinted classes? You may have blue tinted glasses? I don’t know, but what I can say about religion in general and Ahul Sunnah wal Jamat (i.e. Islam) and Catholicism in particular is that in their tradition they promote mutual understanding.
I do not agree with this as a general premise, but that’s neither here nor there. Far be it for me to try to sabotage any attempts at understanding, which are all certainly very important. I only question the feasibility of mutual understanding when approaching two such disparate faiths. If there is such a push coming from the Muslim side, it certainly is not based upon anything that I would recognize as being true understanding of Christianity (I would add the same for the Christian side with regard to Islam, but Rome’s view of the relationship between Christianity and Islam is not one that I share to begin with, so for all I know there could be great strides being made in such talks. Tfeh.)
I wish to finish on something beautiful:
Lord, make me an instrument of your peace.
Where there is hatred, let me sow love.
Where there is injury, pardon.
Where there is doubt, faith.
Where there is despair, hope.
Where there is darkness, light.
Where there is sadness, joy.
O Divine Master,
grant that I may not so much seek to be consoled, as to console;
to be understood, as to understand;
to be loved, as to love.
For it is in giving that we receive.
It is in pardoning that we are pardoned,
and it is in dying that we are born to Eternal Life.
Amen.
In the spirit of hospitality, here is something beautiful in return. From Metropolitan Elias Qurban of the Antiochian Orthodox Church in Lebanon, here is the hymn “Miladouka”, recorded as part of his collection of Divine Byzantine Hymns in 1977: tindeck.com/listen/mtit

**
ميلادك ايها المسيح الهنا قد اشرق نور المعرفةِ للعالم لان الساجدين للكواكب فيهِ تعلموا من الكوكب السجود لك يا شمس العدل و عرفوا انك المشرق الذي من العلاء يا رب المجدُ لك**
 
? Thought I answered this and I’m not sure why you are asking this?

Islam has certain definitions about God. We view God as both Transcendent and Immanent. He is ultimately Transcendent, but is Immanent contingently, since the universe is contingent. We know God through His attributes, which can be said to be anologus to our own attributes. For example we are merciful and God is Merciful, but we make the distinction that God’s Mercy is not our mercy +, but is of an entirely different category that we cannot know through our minds, but comprehend in our hearts. We may be able to see from this that we have no need of ‘the Son’ or ‘Holy Spirity’ in our theology. In fact to have such ideas would go against our understanding of God’s Oneness.

You worship One God based on your understanding, but this would not be classified as One God in our understanding. So if we take Islam’s understanding to be true - that Jesus was fully man only (elevated as He was) - then to worship Him as God in the understanding of a Trinity would be idolatory however we were to justify it. This is why the definitions in our scripture of the Trinity differ with yours because it is looking at the reality of it’s case (from our perspective of what that is, of course). Also it should be noted that Islam did not come to detail the finer points of Christian theology, but to highlight what is problematic relative to Islam. This is why statements only focus on certain aspects. In addition, scripture is clear that you are not ‘all alike’ and so any mention of Christians should be prefixed with ‘some’ (as commentators have understood them) because it is clear that Roman Catholics and most other modern denominations do not worship Mary as a God, for example. If its any consolation Ahul Sunnah wal Jamat (i.e. the Muslims) get called infidel by the Salafis for praying for intercession too 🙂
Very interesting response indeed. I admit that I was guilty trying to put bait on you, and I apologize for that. I think that we can have good discussion here.
 
Thanks, Men0 for clarifying because yes, I have absolutely no experience knowing any Muslim…and I live out in the NW…I worked with a language teacher with Japanese and he shared some side remarks about cultural differences with the Saudis but that is all.

So my first wake-up was the Iranian revolution in late 70’s, some people from our company worked there and escaped in time, and I saw that as an isolated incident…I was leaving the country within weeks in September 1973 when the Palestinians stormed and killed Israeli athletes and the depth of violence was brutally shocking…briefly recal the 1967 war, and how the Crusades tried to take back the Jews and Christians’ Holy Land and what happened to Constantinope, taken over by Muslims. That is it…forgave all, moved on…

It was 9/11 and Americans began to really study Islam, and what we came across was the constant wars against non-Christians all down through the ages. One man had a time line showing its 1400 year history and it didn’t show hospitality. People were buying books, reading online, reading about the behaviors of Arabs towards non-Muslims, their treatment of Jews in parts surrounding Russia. Then we saw Muslim immigrants suing their way into our country when they have full rights to worship, and then the issue of speaking one way in English, and another in Arabic…
Arafat the Palestinian did this all the time, the Muslim Brotherhood is associated with Hamas, and the US Military now sees Hezbollah as much more dangerous than Al Qaeda.

So your experience is providing a new light and with your own ethnic background, you are communicating to me in terms and sentiments that come across as honest and reflecting an authentic experience.

I guess I am not concerned about how hospitable British Middle Eastern ethnic Muslims are… I would say, in your discussions with them, now at this interlude, how do they view Great Britain? Do they intend to make it a Muslim government some day? Or do they wish to remain as they are within British society? We heard that 25% of young British Muslims believe in terrorism. We read that much of the Muslim world rejoiced at the downing of innocent people…what take do you take on that ?

The other weird thing that happened here in 2002, which freaked Americans out, was how the Muslims were rejoicing across the country that a Muslim discovered America not Columbus…and how a violent conquest feeds such a mentality to eventually want to take over our country and make it their own…so it causes alot of bad feelings…kill destroy envy land lust. About the NYC mosque at the W TC, many Muslim imams throughout the world oppose it, including those in the USA, but it is a very insensitive group and about 28 property owners and a few in their local NYC who are pushing it against the will of the people and 70% of the country, with 15-20% being anti-religion anything. I was reading comments by the locals. One was talking about the bad attitude of the foreign Arabs there towards the locals, and some of them came on very crude. So that is my impression.

I have a community of Muslims about 12 blocks from my house put in by our city council. As a woman, I am leery if they would speak to me. I allowed a Muslim woman will full dress to cross the street in the heavy rain and she gave me a smile to die for…3 times she looked at me with the most profound and sincere thankfulness. It gave me insight.

But I don’t like people coming here to reap all the good we do and then want to take over and change hands. Or wanting their religion to take over the world…which isn’t true religion.

Thanks…also I have spoken several years ago in my own diocese about the silence given the Iraqi Catholics who are being decimated in the country of their origins, having been there long before the Muslims…and now the Christians of South Sudan are being wiped out by the northern Arab Muslims…that is what they call them, Arab, but they look Sudanese…anyway, it is this brutality we see in Nigeria and elsewhere towards indigenous people. I want to see the mainline Muslims arise with the rest of the world to stop this genocide.
 
And I am very confused about the actual beliefs of Muslims who come to CAF, which are such a tiny number representing Islam. They have their own website which people say is highly monitored.

And yes, Islam is not able to even understand basic Christianity.

The Vatican has said dialogue with Islam has been very difficult, and Pope Benedict’s talk at Regens…forget spelling of Germany city, was misquoted repeatedly by the secular media and inflamed Muslims again throughout the world.

It is the contradiction of seeing all this hospitality and inflammation…
 
Without a doubt I’ve yet to see a more respectful thread to come along to date. It speaks volumes for those involved. 🙂
 
Thanks for all the posts and positive comments 👍. All praise is due to God. 🙂
I don’t have time (it is Eid) to tackle all the questions in one go, but will endeavour to do so in time - God willing.
I’ll go in reverse chronological order
And I am very confused about the actual beliefs of Muslims who come to CAF, which are such a tiny number representing Islam. They have their own website which people say is highly monitored.
And yes, Islam is not able to even understand basic Christianity.
The Vatican has said dialogue with Islam has been very difficult, and Pope Benedict’s talk at Regens…forget spelling of Germany city, was misquoted repeatedly by the secular media and inflamed Muslims again throughout the world.
It is the contradiction of seeing all this hospitality and inflammation…
There certainly are contradictions, just look at Egypt! They have modern media techniques with sexual content and then over exaggerate when people fornicate!?! You can’t have one without the necessary result of the other. When something is in a state of change there will be ‘running in time’ for everything to settle. How to deal with modernity in an Islamic Egypt has not been resolved. Mind you contradiction is the nature of the human condition and of course if you look at one group then compare with another then you’ll obviously find discrepancies. What resolves the issue is to look in detail at one element, so in our current discussion that would be the classical understanding of ahul Sunnah wal Jamat, or the overwhelming majority of Muslim thought.
I wrote before as to why I am here. I cannot really speak for anyone else. There are some decent Muslim forums, such as sunniforum, which is very much like this one. Highly monitored?
Not sure how a religion (i.e. Islam) can misunderstand another religion (i.e. Christianity) :confused: If you mean Muslims often misunderstand Christianity then yes I’d agree and this is precisely why I ventured into dialogue of mutual understanding. Often disagreements are based on a misunderstanding; I’m sure you’re as bored of complaints about the Pope being absolutely infallible (rather than just in faith and morals when speaking ex Cathedra) as I am about Sayyid Qutub’s ideas being said to be Islamic. If you mean some of our scripture does not represent Catholicism then I still agree. Like I said in an earlier post our scripture highlights what is problematic from amongst the Christians relative to Islam only, its not meant to highlight the finer points of Christian theology neither each individual idea from the plethora that have existed. Some groups have understood the ‘three persons of one substance’ as very much three individual persons i.e. three gods, or at least what we’d call three gods even though the group in question would view it as one. Its a matter of perspective.
The press really did make a meal of that German lecture. I read it and thought it basically fine, the press tried to put words in his mouth. Mind you the media try this all the time; when His Holiness went to Africa and gave a superb speech about how to deal with the AIDS crisis by empowering women, teaching people how to love etc all the press reported was the soundbite ‘condoms aren’t the solution.’ Outrageous misrepresentation! I’m appalled and like I always say, you guys get the worst press coverage - and that’s saying something coming from a Muslim! We can work together to address this injustice 👍
Ultimately, understanding breeds peach and ignorance breeds conflict.
 
Men0 and Jharek,

I am understanding there are different sects.

Thanks for responding…but let me try asking again for perspective…how do British Muslims think of Great Britain as a country?..and this is regarding those Muslims of Middle Eastern descent, who are born in Great Britain. Do they see Great Britain as a place to take over in time through births?..as Libya’s Qaddafi once said through the wombs of Muslim women?

Or do British born Muslims of Middle Eastern ethnic background simply tolerate the status quo, but want to bring in Sharia…because this is indeed an issue. This is what we are worried about here…Most Muslims are silent.

When 9/11 happened, several Muslims called in as anonymous. They defended our country but said they could not say anything for fear of being killed – if they opposed these radical people posing as moderates. They have freedom of religion here and do not wish to change our Constitution and way of life. That is good.

So again, we get these anonymous callers. I remember hearing a Muslim reporter saying he had visited Al Qaeda years back. When he heard of their plans for terror, and not privvy to the 9/11 planning, he left thinking these people were crazy…absolutely crazy…I heard him.

But what I am addressing are the Muslims in Great Britain, and my concerns of the Muslims coming here in desert garb – in droves, since 9/11 who are silent. do you understand now where I am coming from? I could work to build relationship in that Muslim neighborhood that was instantly created…would they even be open to me a woman? I met a Muslim woman a few years ago in a poor neighborhood doing a parish census…she saw me again and came out to hug me and said she now understood me…I shared with her my prayer card of the Sacred Heart of Jesus. She told me the Muslim community by me was OK with her living on the otherside of town, and she told me that they know in their hearts what happened to us was wrong.

But it is the silence and then the other part too, how they do not understand Scriptures and misunderstand Christ…to their detriment. I mean, I can accept a Muslim believer who has the correct understanding of Christ, but wants to remain in his own religion.

That lady was very nice. And the fact she responded to me the way she did does not mean that my concerns make me a jerk, either.
 
…how do British Muslims think of Great Britain as a country?..and this is regarding those Muslims of Middle Eastern descent, who are born in Great Britain. Do they see Great Britain as a place to take over in time through births?..as Libya’s Qaddafi once said through the wombs of Muslim women?
Give me time my friend 🙂 Like I said I’ll get to it. Anyway, the basic answer is that different people have different perspectives. The Muslim sub-continent population first came to the UK as invited labour for the cotton industry. The Muslim Arab population first came to the UK as invited medical doctors to work in the National Health Service. Since these time, people have come to the UK for other reasons, such as my Iraqi friends fleeing the persecution of Saddam. From the above we can see that the umbrella reason has been for a better life. As such they are happy with the UK and its organisation just the way it is, since they have more freedoms (including Islamically) than back in their so called Muslim countries.
Of course Muslims like Shariah Law and there are efforts to implement the Family Law bit, which is a reasonable endeavour as the Arch Bishop of Canterbury points out. Beyond that then there isn’t really any effort to ‘conquer’ Britain or Islamicise it. As Muslims become part of the fabric of the community then they’ll look for their voices to be heard, but that’s part and parcel of democracy.
There are some idiots like this Choudhry person and the like. The question is why do they feel that way? Why do they not feel part of society? Are they angry because there is no purpose in the modern World and so have synthetically found some? I’m really not so sure, other than they’re in a gross minority because, simply, if subjects are happy why would they wish to overthrow their Queen? There may be more people saying silly things, but they’re just empty words given their lack of action. I would say there is more effort to make a place Pakistani or whatever than make it Muslim and personally this annoys me when its done with no respect for the English.
PS Colonel Ghaddafi is mentally ill
 
OK we’ll see how much more I can get done
So my first wake-up was the Iranian revolution in late 70’s… in September 1973 when the Palestinians stormed and killed Israeli athletes …briefly recal the 1967 war…
You must understand that the Muslim World is in a seruious state of turmoil because its going through a reformation. The Muslim World was just that, there were no nations or whatever, it had its own organisation under the Ottoman (Turkish) Caliphate. Since the collapse of the caliphate and the introduction by colonialists of nations and arbitrary demarkations has caused disruption. Some of these nations went down the line of forced modernisation, which was not received well and so more extreme elements responded and woed the masses into revolts, such as in Iran. There is simply too much to say, other than Europes reformation was similarly chaotic and bloody, of course eventually it settled down, but only after two World Wars, wars to end all wars. The Muslim World will settle down, but it needs time to find its feet. Some countries have found their feet, like Jordan - which interestingly, the establishment of which, was an experiement by the British - whilst others are in turmoil like Afghanistan - the Russians didn’t help that situation. There are multiple factors, which have resulted in the perceived violence from ‘Islamdom,’ many completely alien to Islam, but that said we do have to take responsability and make intelligent moves that engage with the modern World, but its complex.
It was 9/11 and Americans began to really study Islam, and what we came across was the constant wars against non-Christians all down through the ages. One man had a time line showing its 1400 year history and it didn’t show hospitality. People were buying books, reading online, reading about the behaviors of Arabs towards non-Muslims, their treatment of Jews in parts surrounding Russia.
Hmmm… difficult unless we contextualise. Its a bit like saying China has more executions than anywhere else in the World because by virtue of their massive population they are quite clearly going to. I think if you look at it as a proportion then I think Texas comes on top, but I may have mistook it for another State. Britain is generally seen as a peaceful and I suppose it is relatively, but then we are probably guilty for many problems in modern World, like we invented the concentration camp in S. Africa or contributed to the start of WWII by [greedily and] deliberately forcing Germany to admit full responsability for WWI and the list goes on and on. If we contextualise things then we’ll see that actually maybe things aren’t quite as they first seem.
Its good that people want to find out but it does depend [with this free press] what they read because there are a lot of people out there that want to make a buck. There joke is apostacise from Islam and right a book of rhetorical nonesense and become a bestseller over night. If you go to places of learning they do not go on and on about Muslim brutality because its not really an issue.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top