This is how I see the difference between belief and knowledge claims.
So, now “convinced” again stopped meaning “persuaded” and started to mean “certain”.
I wonder if that is not precisely why you used a word with two meanings like “convinced”…
Of course, it shows that here we have an obvious “red herring”.
I don’t use the word “faith”. This is why I don’t use “Faith”.
Faith is not belief or hope. Faith is the excuse you use for holding a belief about reality when you have no good reason to hold that position.
Oh, really…?
You do not use the word “faith”, and that is why you actually used it once in each of those (and some later) sentences?
Of course you use the word “faith”. You simply can’t handle the case of an atheist wondering if, perhaps, God does exist. And you try to offer an irrelevant and silly distraction to us - or, perhaps, mostly to yourself.
I’ll leave this to the fair-minded readers to see if my responses are as ridiculous as you appear to believe they are. I don’t think they are as unintelligent to understand what I was talking about or addressing.
You know, I suspect that actually saying what “world view” (if not “religion”) is supposed to be, and connecting your sayings to that definition would be more useful.
Of course, if you can’t actually give a definition and stick to it (perhaps with modifications - but explicit ones), and give an argument that does not lead to absurd conclusions (like the conclusion that Christianity or Islam are not “religions” or “world views” either), there isn’t much left for you to do, but offer silly distractions for us - or for yourself…
All my position of atheist comes down to the fact that theists can not demonstrate their claims and just argue in logical models.
And all that has nothing to do with the subject of the thread. The question “Is atheism a religion?” (or “Is atheism a world view?”, if you wish) is completely independent of questions like “Is being an atheist a good idea?”.