A
ANV
Guest
Not “positive” or “negative”, that’s my thought from reading the bible.:clappingositive at last!
![]()
Not “positive” or “negative”, that’s my thought from reading the bible.:clappingositive at last!
![]()
I don’t like capitalism, it allows most of the wealth to be concentrated to a small percentage of the population while those who actually produce the wealth are treated to very low wages in comparison. Not only that it produces a situation called wage slavery. No catholic can seriously support a system like that.:clappingositive at last!
![]()
Jesus used the idea of profit as an analogy for something completely unrelated. Do you know what that is? Or did you honestly think that Jesus was walking around giving a seminar on Capitalism?Jesus promoted capitalism in his Parable of the Talents Mat 25:16 where the first servant traded with his 5 talents and made 5 more.
He used an example where capitalism is involved. If capitalism is evil, he didn’t mentioned it and there is no reason for him to use such a poor example. Whether I know what the parable is about is irrelevant. If the servant is indeed engaging in trading/capitalism my point stands. Why the nitpick? Get your caffeine fix.Jesus used the idea of profit as an analogy for something completely unrelated. Do you know what that is?
Did you think I was actually thinking that? Get real.Or did you honestly think that Jesus was walking around giving a seminar on Capitalism?
First off, if you mean by wage slavery, “if anyone was unwilling to work, neither should that one eat,” (2 Thes. 3:10) that is not slavery. The gift of being capable of doing productive work comes with the duty to do it. This is not an uncharitable standard.I don’t like capitalism, it allows most of the wealth to be concentrated to a small percentage of the population while those who actually produce the wealth are treated to very low wages in comparison. Not only that it produces a situation called wage slavery. No catholic can seriously support a system like that.
There has to be another way.
When St. Peter gave Ananias and Spapphira a dressing down about lying about their contribution to the Church, he said, “While it remained unsold, did it not remain yours? And when it was sold, was it not still under your control?” (Acts 5:4) Even from the earliest times, there has been a recognized right to own private property. The description of the Ideal Wife in Proverbs is obviously capitalistic: “She picks out a field to purchase; out of her earnings she plants a vineyard.” More to the point are the Lord’s parables of the vineyard owners, who hire workers and pay them a wage at the end of the day and who let out a vineyard to tenant farmers–“planted a vineyard, put a hedge around it, dug a wine press, and built a tower. Then he leased it to tenant farmers and left”–and expected a share of the proceeds when the harvest was completed.Jesus used the idea of profit as an analogy for something completely unrelated. Do you know what that is? Or did you honestly think that Jesus was walking around giving a seminar on Capitalism?
Is that what i meant.?First off, if you mean by wage slavery, “if anyone was unwilling to work, neither should that one eat,” (2 Thes. 3:10) that is not slavery. The gift of being capable of doing productive work comes with the duty to do it. This is not an uncharitable standard…
I recognize the right to own property. However i don’t recognize the right to own property at the expense of other peoples dignity, or at the expense of the common good.When St. Peter gave Ananias and Spapphira a dressing down about lying about their contribution to the Church, he said, “While it remained unsold, did it not remain yours? And when it was sold, was it not still under your control?” (Acts 5:4) Even from the earliest times, there has been a recognized right to own private property. .