Is Darwin's Theory of Evolution True? Part 4.1

  • Thread starter Thread starter Techno2000
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sacred Tradition is one of the two sources of the deposit of the catholic faith that Christ left us. In this sense, I think ‘theological tradition’ can be very important and appropriate. Yes?
 
Last edited:
I don’t understand why you lump the Big Bang Theory and Darwinism together. The picture painted by the data concerning the changes that have taken place over more than thirteen billion years most definitely fits the Genesis narrative and it does not require mental gymnastics to describe it as such.

Summarizing the process, from nothing, whether or not the first instance of time was a singularity, the entire universe was at its earliest stages a plasma - undifferentiated material being in the form of light. After that first “day” of creation, utilizing that light or primal matter, whatever one may call it, subatomic particles were brought into being and joined together into greater wholes of hydrogen atoms which, in the myriad of suns that developed, went on to bring into existence atoms with greater mass. These in turn. formed the planets. That star dust was utilized in the creation of life. Whether single cells, plants or animals, these are all expressions of a new form of being, to some degree having not only a physical dimension, but also instinctive perceptions, “interpretations” of those “sensory” experiences as well as behaviour patterns, all united in the reality of their existence in themselves, which was and is in relation to their environment.

Ultimately, we find ourselves as the crown of creation, a creature, a unity of perception, knowledge, feelings and action, 100% spirit and 100% matter, capable of knowing its maker, capable of love. I would place more value on the Biblical report that creation took place over six “days”, than how we structure the changes that occured in the universe from the Planck Epoch until the advent of mankind. Genesis does a far better job at conveying the reality of creation, the fact that it was done in a step-wise fashion, utilizing what had been created to bring into existence new forms of being ex nihilo.
 
Last edited:
Evolution doesn’t require anything to die out, necessarily, except less successful genes.
 
My guess is that polar bears will very quickly adapt to an iceless world, since a large part of their survival is based on behaviors, and bears are smart animals. It is possible, however, that they will die out except in zoos. The younger ones among us may actually live long enough to see which way things go.
 
Last edited:
Correction: cockroaches are the crown of creation. We’re just a blip on the radar.
 
What was the trigger for the Big Bang?
  1. The Big Bang exploded into what? Nothing?
  2. After the explosion, gravity just sort of appeared?
  3. Planetary formation is still poorly understood.
 
Then I’m wrong that receding ice will be a critical environmental pressure for them. But we’ll see how they are as their habitat changes.
 
benjamin1973 said:
My guess is that polar bears will very quickly adapt to an iceless world, since a large part of their survival is based on behaviors, and bears are smart animals. It is possible, however, that they will die out except in zoos. The younger ones among us may actually live long enough to see which way things go.
Click to expand...
So they might survive, or they might not.
 
Hugh_Farey said:
Paula Haigh, thought exactly that.
Click to expand...
Citation, please.
Re: Human Embryo “gills”. Over the years, scientists would have examined many human embryos, and checked out the “fish gills” claim, discovering it to be a fairy tale. The so-called gills turned out to simply be folds of skin-flesh. Another idiotic Darwinist myth bites the dust.
Birds could certainly be bred from dinosaurs, given a big enough farm and sufficient time, and much more quickly than actually occurred a hundred million years ago.
Click to expand...
How would you bred dinosaurs to produce feathers and an avian respiratory system?
Mostly living in a colder climate, coupled to predation.
Click to expand...
How would the environmental pressure of a colder climate help change a dinosaur into a bird? (Dinosaurs were cold-blooded, weren’t they? Therefore they would avoid cold climates.)
 
Last edited:
rossum said:
Yes. You can look up the dates on the internet.
Click to expand...
It’s hard to believe that they are actually dates marking evolutionary history published on the internet, yet there still exist some people who question the truth of evolution. The ignorance, stupidity and pig-headedness of evo-deniers makes me sick!
 
Techno2000 said:
In my hypothetical dinosaur ranch, if I could control all the dinosaurs on it.And shield them from “environmental pressures” I could in effect stopped the Bird from ever coming into existence…yes…or…no ?
Click to expand...
Consider horse breeding. For thousands of years, human breeders of these animals have had to come up with ingenious ideas to prevent these animals evolving into non-horses.
 
Hugh_Farey said:
Yes, indeed, it would be very easy not to breed birds from dinosaurs.
Click to expand...
All these experiments can be performed when we get to heaven and have eternity to finally determine if evolution is true or not.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top