Is Darwin's Theory Of Evolution True?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Techno2000
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Not true. Bacteria who have gone through the equivalent of long years of evolution always remain bacteria.
 
edwest211 said:
Not true. Bacteria who have gone through the equivalent of long years of evolution always remain bacteria.
Click to expand...
And eukaryotes that have gone through the equivalent of long years of evolution always remain eukaryotes. That is the nature of the nested hierarchy.

Humans are eukaryotes, amoeba are eukaryotes. Both have evolved from an original eukaryote.

If you do not understand the nested hierarchy then you will find it difficult to understand evolution. At the level of “Bacteria” there are only two other options: Archea and Eukaryotes. See the Tree of Life.

rossum
 
Last edited:
Carmel said:
Darwin’s Theory of Evolution is a Religion - a sort of blind faith in something which didn’t happen.
Click to expand...
I find this proposition strange. It often appears among religious critics of evolution. In order to criticise evolution, they say, “evolution is a religion.” This implicitly says that they think that a religion is inferior to science. By calling evolution a religion they are saying “evolution is not real science because it is a religion and hence inferior”. For a Christian to say, “religion is inferior to science” is a strange position to take.

$0.02

rossum
 
STT said:
You have to wait very long, 1000,000 to 100,000 years, to see significant changes in a population with size of 1000,000 to 1000,000,000
Click to expand...
That amount of time, and more has already passed and still nothing.
 
Todays my birthday 11-17-1963 but that’s only symbolic .Our real birthday happen many billions of moons ago when we were just chemicals floating in Mother earth’s womb. I remember it like yesterday when we became a Cell !!!..That was our real birthday.
 
That is what they teach, but it ain’t so. The evidence is mounting against the Darwinian idea.
 
Let’s examine. They worship the god of BUC (blind unguided chance) It can’t be proved but it must be so, evolutionism = blind faith.
 
buffalo said:
Rephrase - where did the info come from? Show me the step by step?
Click to expand...
It came from the environment. Random mutations introduced random variations into the population. Some mutations introduced information that did not match the environment; natural selection eliminated those mutations over the generations. Some mutations introduced information that did match the environment; natural selection increased the frequency of those mutations and spread them through the population. Thus information is copied from the environment into the DNA of organisms living in that environment.

Matching mutations are spread; non-matching mutations are eliminated. Over time the process increases the degree of matching between the organisms and their environment.

Now please explain where the information needed for an omniscient creator God came from.

rossum
 
buffalo said:
Let’s examine. They worship the god of BUC (blind unguided chance) It can’t be proved but it must be so, evolutionism = blind faith.
Click to expand...
Natural selection is neither blind nor unguided. Chance is only part of the process. By ignoring the role of natural selection you are tilting at windmills. If you want to deal with evolution then you have to include natural selection in your analysis. Random mutation alone is not evolution.

rossum
 
That is fantasy. Sounds good though.

The uncaused cause had it to start with,
 
It all came from BUC in the materialist view.

Natural selection is a conservative process and not a creative one.
 
Neglecting the complexity of behaviour, here’s some internet photos of just the structure of some pretty awesome creatures:

(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)

random, you say

(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)

hmm

(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)

“Natural selection”, really?

(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)

not really getting it

(Please Note: This uploaded content is no longer available.)

Random mutations and natural selection? I don’t think so. Seeing is believing.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top