Is Darwin's Theory Of Evolution True?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Techno2000
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
anon65111186 said:
That is talking about human parents, animals are not included in that definition. Adam and Eve could have had animal parents but not human parents, neither Genesis or Doctrine rules that out as far as I see.
Click to expand...
Animals can give birth to a human? Wow. How does that fit into the theory of evolution? And I wonder why God chose “the last Adam” to be born of Mary, when he just have easily used a chimp.
 
Techno2000 said:
About as far you can go with this is…Selective Breeding. You can only extrapolate and speculate if this might cause random mutations to create whole new species of animals.
Click to expand...
Where do you think horses came from, Techno? Humans bred them from cows over thousands of years. And chimps evolved so fast in the 20th century that they beat humans into space!
 
Glark said:
40.png
edwest211:
How do they know how to build a honeycomb?
Click to expand...
How do they know to build honeycomb cells in hexagonal shapes? They must have engineering degrees.
Click to expand...
Random Mutations can do it all !!!
 
Last edited:
Jomann said:
Actually you seems to follow the scientism ideology
Click to expand...
I like to call it atheist theology or atheology (despite the oxymoron). A lot of atheists study evolution like some Christians study the Bible.
 
A typical dodge. Whether atheists or religious, who does science doesn’t matter. However, after years of posting here, evolution has only one value - propaganda, or psychological warfare. This is only about creating arguments and stories designed to confuse the work of God and to put this theory wholly into the materialist realm.
 
How about the sleep part?

21 Then, Yahweh God made the man fall into a deep sleep. And, while he was asleep, he took one of his ribs and closed the flesh up again forthwith.

22 Yahweh God fashioned the rib he had taken from the man into a woman, and brought her to the man.
 
Last edited:
Anything. 100% anything. Like building a watch while blind and having no idea where the parts go. I wouldn’t write fiction that was infinitely flexible.
 
anon65111186 said:
Pope Pius XII taught in his encyclical that "the teaching authority of the Church does not forbid that, in conformity with the present state of human sciences and sacred theology, research and discussions . . . take place with regard to the doctrine of evolution, in as far as it inquires into the origin of the human body as coming from pre-existent and living matter—[but] the Catholic faith obliges us to hold that souls are immediately created by God
Click to expand...
I predict that when she finally comes to her senses, Holy Mother Church will infallibly declare that Adam’s body was created from inanimate matter in an instant - just as Genesis 2:7 says it did. Then it will be goodbye evolution and good riddance.
 
Last edited:
anon65111186 said:
Figuratively, not necessarily literally as the Catechism teaches, "The account of the fall in Genesis 3 uses figurative language, but affirms a primeval event, a deed that took place at the beginning of the history of man. " (CCC 390).
Click to expand...
In my opinion, when it comes to the origins of man and Genesis, the CCC has been corrupted by Scientism. In this respect, it is not a reliable source of sound Catholic teaching. Its bias towards the evolutionary paradigm is painfully obvious.

For example, as far as I know, nowhere in the entire CCC does it say that Catholics are free to believe in a literal interpretation of Genesis - on the contrary, there is an obvious and untraditional emphasis on a figurative or symbolic interpretation. The reason for this is clear - it facilitates the acceptance of evolution.
 
Last edited:
anon65111186 said:
My point exactly, thank you @LeafByNiggle ! Forcing God to only work miracles to create Adam and Eve ignores the beauty and design of nature. God normally works through nature, rarely through miracles. It is more reasonable and easier to imagine evolution than to imagine clay suddenly becoming all the compounds and elements a human body contains. Even the Eucharist doesn’t do that.
Click to expand...
God Almighty created the entire universe out of NOTHING and you have trouble believing God created Adam from dirt? That does not compute.

btw, “Adam” is Hebrew for “ground”, not “humanoid”.
 
Last edited:
Glark said:
the CCC has been corrupted by Scientism
Click to expand...
So we are led to believe you are more of an authority than the Catechism of the Catholic Church? You know better than the Catholic Church.

Who died (or resigned) and made you Pope?
 
Glark said:
God Almighty created the entire universe out of NOTHING and you have trouble believing God created Adam from dirt?
Click to expand...
Who said I have trouble believing that, I believe it was dirt, but came to be something else in between, before transforming into Adam.
 
Glark said:
I predict that when she finally comes to her senses, Holy Mother Church will infallibly declare that Adam’s body was created from inanimate matter in an instant - just as Genesis 2:7 says it did. Then it will be goodbye evolution and good riddance.
Click to expand...
Speculation, you don’t know the future. What do you have against evolution, seriously?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top