Some people like Latin Mass, some people can’t stand it. There is no “universal language” that everyone loves or understands.
As to why people are drawn to Mass in Latin, Greek, Aramaic… it’s not the “age” of the language (though that is rather neat), it’s because it makes them feel a closeness with a tradition that they associate with. It’s the same reason why entering a Gothic cathedral makes a person feel a certain way and gain a certain closeness to God. It’s not that Gothic architecture is particularly holy in and of itself, it’s that it represents an aesthetic western European tradition and connects us to past Latin rite Catholics.
I could say the same thing about Greek liturgy and Byzantine architecture, and so on and so forth down the line of languages, peoples, traditions, and art forms. One is not inherently more holy than the other. We shouldn’t make such claims about Latin simply because most Catholics follow the Latin Rite. Not only does that marginalize our Eastern Catholic brothers, who are indeed just as Catholic as you and I, but it also shuts us off from a myriad of beautiful traditions that make our church truly catholic, truly universal. Broaden your perspective away from a single language, attend an Eastern Catholic liturgy, and I think you will realize that there is nothing exceptional about the Latin language. It’s made special by its place in the hearts of Catholics, not because it was selected by God… and there are other languages that are made equally special to different people. For some people, that may be modern vernacular. For others, it may be a language more ancient than Latin, or the language of Christ Himself.