C
CatsAndDogs
Guest
I tell those who present me with information what I think of the information they’ve presented to me. That you may not like my interpretation of what you’ve presented to me gives you some options as to how to address what I responded with.Quote:
Originally Posted by CatsAndDogs View Post
You haven’t “re-thunk” (!?) your faith. You have lost your faith. To have any faith is to accept God as God (qua God) as given us by the Church, and you will only accept God on your own terms.
You have the strange and dishonest habit of restating positions of those who differ from you in grossly inaccurate ways, and in assuming you know what the other side thinks, believes, or wants.
You could call me names, and play the “victim card”, or you could correct me in where I’m wrong so that I might more accurately understand you as you understand you.
Your point of view is not clear to me. That’s the problem. What you’ve given me tells me that you are angry at the “supposed Catholic God” (or His representatives) for telling people to do time-wasting things when they SHOULD be simply “doing good in the world” instead of this “worthless prayer” stuff.I guess this makes you secure in your own belief system, but ultimately I feel sorry for you because you will never learn or grow from other points of view. Your knowledge will remain stagnant.
Now, instead of allowing us to inform you about definitional inaccuracies regarding God, prayer, “good”, “doing”, and various other things, you get annoyed at others perceived inaccuracies of you, when our (my) inaccuracies are not of you, as I don’t know you (the person), but rather of what your displayed understandings of those “items” are I just mentioned (God, prayer, et al).
If you don’t want to talk with me any longer, simply don’t.
(( By the way, you’re not the first to get annoyed at my “unrelenting ways”, so don’t feel bad.
:shamrock2: