R
ronyodish
Guest
worldcitizen,First I need to make it clear I’m not a Muslim or a Christian in the traditional sense. I believe in one God although He’s called by different names. I accept Christ as the Son of God and that he was born of a virgin why? First, I also accept Zoroaster. Did you know that Christ’s virgin birth was foretold in the Holy Books of the Zoroastrians? That’s one way I know Zoroaster was also a Prophet of God. The three wise kings were Zoroastrian kings who knew of this prophecy and followed the star from Persia I think to Bethlehem. The Zoroastrian Books also spoke about an Arabian Prophet that would arise in the future -Muhammad. Mt Paran refers to Arabia and Ishmael’s great nation was Islam.
Zoroaster, and others like Buddha, and Confucius, were not Prophets of God. They were religious/philosophical Gentile men who in their pagan surroundings, were following their conscience and the natural moral law of God, which is written on every man’s heart, and in doing so, they were able to impart a good amount of holiness and truth, although often times, mixed with error and falsehood. The Church refers to these men collectively as a “preparation” for the Gospel, since they came before the Gospel and were leading to it.
St. Paul explains it like this: “When Gentiles who have not the law do by nature what the law requires, they are a law to themselves, even though they do not have the law. They show that what the law requires is written on their hearts, while their conscience also bears witness and their conflicting thoughts accuse or perhaps excuse them” (Rom. 2:14-15).
As for the Prophets of God, this designation refers to the Jewish Prophets, such as Isaiah and Jeremiah, and with the last Prophet being St. John the Baptizer, who ushered in the coming of the Messiah.
Just as one of the Apostles, Judas, betrayed Jesus, so likewise, some of the successors of the Apostles have betrayed Him. This is nothing new, and has always occurred in the Church, that is, the fact that some who claimed to be following Jesus ended up betraying Him. Nevertheless, the Catholic Church remains Holy, because She is founded upon the Holy Apostles, the Holy Mysteries, and the Holy Saints of God. This Church speaks for Christ, as Christ teaches: “He who hears you hears me, and he who rejects you rejects me, and he who rejects me rejects him who sent me” (Luke 10:16).As far as lo here is Christ or there He is. That’s clearly referring to Christian clergy who in the latter days will claim ‘here is Christ’ but the church has been publicly proven to be corrupt and criminally involved in covering up child sexual abuse from the top down. And it was and has been proven to be organisational cover ups. Are these godly people.
As for the false followers and public unrepentant sinners, Jesus explained that they would coexist with the true faithful people in the parable of the wheat and weeds: “Let both grow together until the harvest; and at harvest time I will tell the reapers, Gather the weeds first and bind them in bundles to be burned, but gather the wheat into my barn” (Matt. 13:30). The weeds (bad Christians), and wheat (good Christians) will coexist until the end of time (harvest), when they will be separated.
We already know that a child sexual abuser who claims to follow Christ, whether as a priest or as a layman, is a false follower. It would be better for such a follower “if a millstone were hung round his neck and he were cast into the sea, than that he should cause one of these little ones to sin” (Luke 17:2).And what is Christ’s test for a true or false Prophet? Ye shall know them by their fruits. Child sexual abuse is plenty fruit enough for any decent person to know exactly who doesn’t have Christ and who cannot possibly pass the test of ye shall know them by their fruits.