D
dzheremi
Guest
Holy moly…I’m losing my patience with this inanity…Ah. I see, then.
So my example was not “ridiculous nonsense”, as my idea of there being 3 legitimate liturgies is, indeed, a Coptic belief.
That you were unaware of that is not my ignorance, but rather yours.
You said that it was Coptic belief that there are three “legitimate” liturgies. Then you posted from a Coptic website that we use three liturgies. Then I responded that yes, we do use three liturgies, but that doesn’t mean that only three liturgies are “legitimate”. That just means that we use three liturgies (and that hasn’t even always been the case, not even in the modern day). Plenty of other Orthodox churches use other liturgies (even churches within the Coptic Patriarchate in Europe, e.g., the British Orthodox Church) and they are entirely legitimate.
Furthermore, again, I have no idea what this is supposed to say about the identity of God, which is the actual topic of discussion in this thread. Please address that before bringing up more irrelevant non-points and your own misunderstanding of the Coptic Orthodox Church. Thank you.
(An aside: I agree with Apotheoun that you need to work on your reading comprehension. It is bad enough that you are bringing in all this irrelevant material to make more dubious arguments, but to do so with other churches’ documents, as though they say what you want them to say just because you read things in terms of “legitimacy” even when that idea or word is not present in the text, is really beyond what anyone in their right mind would call a…ahem…legitimate way of making a point or expressing disagreement.)