S
Semajleahcim
Guest
I’m always wry!![]()
![]()
That has to be one of the funniest things I have ever read on CAF.
If you are serious, I appologize for laughing. I just assume you are being wry.
I’m always wry!![]()
![]()
That has to be one of the funniest things I have ever read on CAF.
If you are serious, I appologize for laughing. I just assume you are being wry.
It states that a man lying with another man in a sexual way is an abomination. That would imply active homosexuality in addition to bisexuality.ok, bisexuals are also an abomination.
whats that got to do with a dude into other dudes?
Your posts get more bizzare by the minute.Thou shalt not lie with a male as with a female.
That’s from the bible. Gay men do not lie with male as with a female, as gay males don’t lie with females at all, bisexual males do. That quote is indicative of the bible condemning bisexuality, not homosexuality.
Studies which are considered subject and none that have been replicated. The one studing the brains of dead “gays” is the one which started this silly discussion to begin with and the dude from 1899 he is the one that coined the word homosexual for he didn’t like being called a sodomite. Oh thats right most if not all of these “studies” where performed by “gay” “scientist”, if I remember right, and I use the word scientist in fear.Um, he just posted a ton of sources right above.
So it is only acceptable to have straight scientists?Studies which are considered subject and none that have been replicated. The one studing the brains of dead “gays” is the one which started this silly discussion to begin with and the dude from 1899 he is the one that coined the word homosexual for he didn’t like being called a sodomite. Oh thats right most if not all of these “studies” where performed by “gay” “scientist”, if I remember right, and I use the word scientist in fear.
Currently the many outspoken “gay” rights leaders have gotten away from the genetic link argument anyways and have centered on the “rights” part of the argument. either way the discussion is really about morality, public mores, etc. genetics or not.
I think if the gay scientists or whoever do find genetic proof for gayness and other sinful activities and dispositions, basically all that will proove is that man is in a naturally depraved fallen state. So, the bible is right. Thanks for the apologetic bonus science!Studies which are considered subject and none that have been replicated. The one studing the brains of dead “gays” is the one which started this silly discussion to begin with and the dude from 1899 he is the one that coined the word homosexual for he didn’t like being called a sodomite. Oh thats right most if not all of these “studies” where performed by “gay” “scientist”, if I remember right, and I use the word scientist in fear.
Currently the many outspoken “gay” rights leaders have gotten away from the genetic link argument anyways and have centered on the “rights” part of the argument. either way the discussion is really about morality, public mores, etc. genetics or not.
You can never prove anything. You can only support your claims. And the evidence supports their claims. Unless we misunderstood the evidence and it meant something else. Which at this stage of genetics is possible.That has not been proven. Correlation is not causation.
Yea they should stick to their dancing and interior design. We don’t want em gettin no fancy ideas.So it is only acceptable to have straight scientists?
What exactly are gays allowed to do for a job? Folks here don’t want them in any sort of civil service, or public office, or military, or medical, or psychological, or therapeutic field, or education.
What’s left? Theater?![]()
Perhaps the act of sexual intercourse is a choice. But who you are attracted to and who you love most certainly cannot be a choice.Homosexuality is NOT a choice! Huh??? You mean someone, somebody, or some kind of supernatural force took control of your body and systematically made you remove your clothes and your partners and these normally voluntary muscles somehow became involuntary???
Any chance you have access to scientific journal database? Are you in university or do you know anyone whom you can borrow their pass? I’m guessing you don’t subscribe to Nature.Studies which are considered subject and none that have been replicated. The one studing the brains of dead “gays” is the one which started this silly discussion to begin with and the dude from 1899 he is the one that coined the word homosexual for he didn’t like being called a sodomite. Oh thats right most if not all of these “studies” where performed by “gay” “scientist”, if I remember right, and I use the word scientist in fear.
Currently the many outspoken “gay” rights leaders have gotten away from the genetic link argument anyways and have centered on the “rights” part of the argument. either way the discussion is really about morality, public mores, etc. genetics or not.
Why are some of us more depraved and more likely to sin than others. That’s a rather biased test.I think if the gay scientists or whoever do find genetic proof for gayness and other sinful activities and dispositions, basically all that will proove is that man is in a naturally depraved fallen state. So, the bible is right. Thanks for the apologetic bonus science!![]()
That wasn’t my point, in fact if you look the social sciences and psychology you may find high numbers of those that are self- indentified as gay, I suspect, the reason is they are trying to figure out what makes them click, which is not necessary a bad thing.So it is only acceptable to have straight scientists?
What exactly are gays allowed to do for a job? Folks here don’t want them in any sort of civil service, or public office, or military, or medical, or psychological, or therapeutic field, or education.
What’s left? Theater?![]()
Another common mistake is to ignore or rule out data which do not support the hypothesis. Ideally, the experimenter is open to the possibility that the hypothesis is correct or incorrect. Sometimes, however, a scientist may have a strong belief that the hypothesis is true (or false), or feels internal or external pressure to get a specific result. In that case, there may be a psychological tendency to find “something wrong”, such as systematic effects, with data which do not support the scientist’s expectations, while data which do agree with those expectations may not be checked as carefully. The lesson is that all data must be handled in the same way.
Please explain how homosexuality is dysfunctional. I have already presented over 40 studies that prove homosexuals and homosexual relationships are no more dysfunctional than heterosexuals and heterosexual relationships. Perhaps you should read the thread thoroughly.Homosexuality should be discouraged because it is dysfunctional. Can you name me any other animal that engages in homosexual activity excluding those animals that have been humanily influenced (i.e.: laboratory animals, domestic animals)?
Hey I never said they were white did I?You’ve got to be kidding me! What you just explained is a fetish for pale white girls with small breasts…not love!!!
Because god said it’s a sin and because god said you have to stone the homosexuals to death. Just like you have to stone to death people that pick up sticks on the sabbath.Jennifer, I said the orientation isn’t a choice. But you didn’t answer my question: Why should homosexuality be discouraged?
John, your question was ridiculous.