Twin studies, at least five of them that I know of show this quite clearly.
And virtually all heteros have homosexual fantasies at some point. Sexual orientation is a spectrum not an either/or.
You are born with a component of it, but not all of it no.
Go tell the American Psychological Association. And then go tell the American Psychiatic Association.
You are right, I think you are here mainly to stir up trouble. I do not take affront by your arguments because they are often without merit. But I get frustrated when you do not present logical answers, ignore the facts presented by others and simply repeat your ridiculous premise over and over.
Have you ever read the twin studies on the subject? Because if you did you’d have a very good idea where such an assertion comes from.
Men claim He condemns it. Mostly the bible is mute on the subject. the few instances (such as leviticus) where it is mentioned are specifically in reference to pagan rituals and not about homosexuality in general (if you bother to read it in context).
Idolatry is clearly forbidden by the ten commandments. Which commandments forbids homosexuality?
No, homosexuality is not genetic. So far no scientific evidence for a genetic component for the development of homosexuality in humans has been found.
Since psychopaths do very well in society, Lenin, Marx, Stalin, Mao, Trotsky, as just a few well known examples of psychopaths who have reached the top levels of their respected nations, it is also not unusual for homosexuals to possess average to above average intelligence.
Are you speaking from personal experience? You seem to claim an insight possessed by no heterosexual?
I’ve educated Tlolac to his error, but he constantly ignores countervailing evidence and is intolerant to other opinions.
It’s called reading.
Tlolac,
Comic books don’t count. You need to read with understanding, not just look at the pictures.
You already started one thread on this particuklar report (linked to above) and declined to defend it when I pointed out the greivous errors in your interpretation of it. But it’s way more convincing this time, really.Tlolac,
Have you read (and understood) Specific Problems with the Twin Studies of Homosexuality contained within the flawed and biased 1992 Twin Studies of Homosexuality?
If not, here is your opportunity:
homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/timt/papers/twin_studies/
I will explain it to you if your reading comprehension skills are not up to it.
No, really, reading will do.
I don’t know Tlolac, you’re grasping at straws again, I successfully defended each of my positions against your suppositions and invectives. You still don’t have a case for a genetic component to homosexual development in humans, and citing invalid and disproven studies doesn’t help your argument/polemics.
Well, denial is a strong symptom within homosexuals, at least according to the St. Luke’s psychiatric Institute in Silversprings Maryland which treated homosexuality found in Priests.
As far as I’m concerned homosexuals have every right to practice religion, attend Mass, glory in God, and do their thing in the privacy and sanctuary of their own home. But the admitance of a homosexual, chaste or not, into a position of authority and severe decision making, such as the Priesthood, cannot be condoned for very good psychological (and now proven, i.e., the scandal) reasons. No homosexual should be physically quarrantined or segregated in the greater society for any reason, and ‘Gay’ bars or hotels or restaraunts or nightclubs are no problem as long as laws are not broken. But prudence demands that their condition eliminates them from positions of sensitive strategic authority where clarity of thought and emotional stability are required.