J
jkiernan56
Guest
No - not modest … just giving credit where credit is due.Well aren’t you modest … Wardspeedpetey then.![]()
As you can see from other postings, I’m not that modest.
No - not modest … just giving credit where credit is due.Well aren’t you modest … Wardspeedpetey then.![]()
:tiphat:Well aren’t you modest … Wardspeedpetey then.![]()
Hee … hee, I was being sarcastic.No - not modest … just giving credit where credit is due.
As you can see from other postings, I’m not that modest.
how is that? are you saying that morality changes based on your geography?Unfortunately you have defeated nothing. At all.
Ok, there you are. I agree with you on that point, and frankly I don’t see what is so hard to grasp about it. One would have to be willfully ignorant to not acknowledge that.:tiphat:
legality has a lot to do with geographyOk, there you are. I agree with you on that point, and frankly I don’t see what is so hard to grasp about it. One would have to be willfully ignorant to not acknowledge that.
Did you have a comment to my post. Agree? Disagree?
Stop digging up old disputes! And stop assuming the worst from everybody! Why is charitibility so hard for you?CWBetts - last evening you and I exchanged some very different ideas in another thread titled “Mad at fellow Catholics. Deal with it.” Please correct me if my assumption was wrong about your intention for coming over to this thread about a minute after having a heated personal exchange in the other.
You’re on his Ignore List! He can’t see your posts! You’re not going to get an answer, move on–Someone else tried to tell me what your intentions were and I told them I would let you speak for yourself. If you honestly can tell me you came here without any connection to our other exchange, then I owe you an apology. It just seemed to me that you had an axe to grind.
Thank you for explaining why he won’t see my posts. I have just added him to my ignore list as well.FYI, you’re not going to get an answer from CWBetts, you’re on his Ignore List.
Enough? No, please … moreHi all,
Sorry for butting in, but, maybe I can make a contribution.
I’ll start with a couple of questions:
Question No. 1: “Is intemperance a sin?”
Question No. 2: “Is an act that is essentially contra-survival a sin?”
Question No 3: “Is an act that can be harmful, in any way, to those in your presence a sin?”
Question No. 4: “Is an act that knowingly ‘self-entraps’ a sin?”
Question No. 5: “Is an act that can cause physical damage to ones self a sin?”
Question No. 6: “Is an act that causes someone to need to tell lies a sin?”
Enough. There are more. Can you come to any conclusion?
Merry Christmas and
God Bless,
JD
I know, I know . . . they focus on smoking that pot - they don’t focus on what that pot smoker is doing to those around him (or, her).Enough? No, please … more
JD … Bottoms up?![]()
But those things are sins because of (a) the illegality of marijuana in our country and (b) the irresponsibility of those parents. They have nothing to do with the substance, cannabis. The criticisms could just as easily be applied to people who bought or manufactured booze during Prohibition, or parents who give their children alcohol.I know, I know . . . they focus on smoking that pot - they don’t focus on what that pot smoker is doing to those around him (or, her).
Pot smokers become, because of continuously performing an illegal act in more and more chancey situations, super “con artists” and liars. When a person becomes good at lying, they’ll lie to everyone, their wives/husbands, children, employers, clients, police, pastors, pushers, you name it. Last I checked, bearing false witness and lying were sins. That which causes a person to sin, IS a sin (except on specific and rare occasions).
Pot smoking causes greater and greater chances to be taken. Not just with ones self, but, with other’s lives too. They’ll bring pot to another’s home and clandestinely smoke it. All the while not knowing whether or not the law is on their trail. (I have seen the results of instances of this with my own eyes.) Before I go to a party, I want to know who else is going and if any of them have a proclivity for pot smoking. I do not want my name in the newspaper the next morning.
But, the worst thing that happens is that the pot smoker inevitably slips into apathy. Apathy, more often than not, defeats a person’s natural inclination for survival. And, not just their own. Obviously, it can affect those people’s families.
Recently, my newspapers have had three instances where pot-smoking parents allowed (and even promoted) their children to smoke it. They were caught. Imagine the wonderful lives they will all have now. 3-year old children caught smoking pot - in unity with their parents. Brings a tear to one’s eye does is not?
Yep: it’s a sin.
Merry Christmas and
God bless,
JD
You are quite correct. A “physical thing” cannot be a “sin”.But those things are sins because of (a) the illegality of marijuana in our country and (b) the irresponsibility of those parents. They have nothing to do with the substance, cannabis. The criticisms could just as easily be applied to people who bought or manufactured booze during Prohibition, or parents who give their children alcohol.
The substance itself isn’t sinful, it’s the wrong use of it.
Very good point JD. That’s the exact same way I view the topic of this thread. I’m glad you made that distinction with alcohol.The misuse of things can, on the other hand, be sinful. A knife or a gun is not a sin, but, using either to kill another is sinful.
Alcohol use (at least to excess) does the same thing.
True - I’m just pointing out thatthe Church does not condemn alcohol :kissme: or tobacco :hey_bud: - just their abuse; and I think the same criteria would apply to marijuana as far as determining whether you’re committing a sin.I know these statements were more than you were probably looking for!
Merry Christmas and
God bless,
JD
That’s not illegal (at least in most states).parents who give their children alcohol.
Like flying saucerys?Saucery in the bible was also another word for pharmacy.