True, we can but an in-custody arrest (one that results in going to jail, instead of just cite and release) is against our department policy for 1st-3rd offenses unless:
Very interesting, thank you for the information. I will be speaking to my wife’s son who is a lawyer later in the day about all of this.
If a law was broken (in this case DUI) that is reason enough to lock them up overnight. Illegal search and seizure simply requires a warrant , though a warrant is unnecessary in certain circumstances.
In most states, the primary condition “that must be met” is called “probable cause”. In Ohio, for instance, probable cause is achieved by a driver simply swerving across the center line on the roadway, a few times. At that time, an officer has the power to stop and investigate the cause(s) of the swerving.
I can’t listen to her at all! Clapton’s good, but I think Santana’s last album was one of his very best!
I spoke to two lawyers at dinner this evening. If a police officer ever stops you, it would be a very moronic act to volunteer that you have a “buzz”. The burden of proof for an alcoholic related offense would then be on the officer and not on you.
Friends who have smoked for 30 years or more seem to have tappered off a bit as they get older. Friends who drink alcohol for years most often develope a real problem.
I agree with all you said. I just believe someones life should not be ruined because they got caught with a little pot and it can be used for medical reasons.
the first link is saying the same thing we have been arguing, it doesnt address counter arguments, the second two links wont come up, please post them if you care to. we need posting against our counter arguments, not repetition of the same arguments we believe fail as appropriate interpretations of scripture or CCC
The only reason aout arguments “fail” is that you have already made up your minds and refuse to submit to what the CCC says.
well, you talk about having a buzz as an ok thing- you’ve said it over and over again throughout this thread. yet when speaking to THE LAW, you say its moronic. If a buzz is ok now ( including alcohol or pot), why not then? because when push comes to shove, you know its wrong.
I know. I have friends who use pot. But of all my friends that use pot, none of them have a medical condition. Fact is, there are drugs that can be used in place of pot… and as our law reads, that is what we should yield too.
Now I may be talking out of school but if I got caught with some weed, that was medication from a Dr, how could it ruin my Life? Just like when I go and pick up pain pills, if they are on me, and I have Id and a bottle saying they were given by a Dr they are legal are they not? Now I have never seen anyone getting weed by a Dr but I know it is given for nausea I believe. But there is one person on this site who does get if from a Dr. Now May I ask you do you get that at the Office or with script at the pharmacy. I really don’t know, and does it come in a script bag or what. Please Im not trying to be funny here.
they fail on the basis of interpretation, not on my personal desire. they classify alcohol and tobacco as one thing and drugs as another, but as any chemist can tell you they are also drugs, if alcohol is allowable, then marijuana must be too, as marijuana is significantly less harmful than alcohol and is not addictive where nicotine and alcohol, are, i pointed this out previously, when i said there are almost no facilities for the treatment of problems with marijuana, because those said problems don’t exist, but there are AA chapters every couple of blocks. its very much a common sense argument.
Well I am going to tell you what my little friend. You get a hold of the Clevland Clinic and let them take a scan of your brain. And when they take a little scan of your brain they can tell you what that weed did to you brain cells. Its now official. They never knew before how harmfull weed was for you, now they know. Don’t believe me call the clinic. I know! Get a scan of someone that smokes weed and someone that does not. The proof is there. It slows down the cells in your brain, Hey don’t believe me find out for yourself. And if you think weed is bad, well try some coke next that another big one. No one is saying Alcohol is not a drug, anything that slows you down or speeds you up is drug. But more people can be social drinkers then social weed smokers. Please trust me I know. I have seen what weed can do to familys too. It just hasn’t been as popular as alcohol give it time. How many grandfather and etc smoked weed, not many but they did drink. Wait for another fifty years you will see.
in some jurisdictions, not in others,
there is no mechanism that causes an inverse relationship between ‘legal’ and ‘responsible’. that is your opinion, nothing more
you dont seem to understand that this argument is only applicable to people in jurisdictions where it is illegal. common sense says that morality by geography is ridiculous. prima facia
more M by G, if its not illegal where i smoke than it is not a sin? apply some common sense to that argument.
some places, alcohol is illegal in large swaths of the globe.
you said i wasnt submitting to the CCC, thats what the defense was about there.
so your only argument is based on geography? so if i smoke it in a legal jurisdiction i am not sinning then right?