T
TheLittleLady
Guest
Please link the document from the CDF. Thanks
No, you’re certainly not wrong to feel this way. I’m not sure what the Church’s official stance on the matter is, or if She even has an official stance, but it is seriously wrong to have as a communion server someone whose behavior or appearance goes against the natural (and therefore entirely justified) sensibilities of other Christians.What is the church’s position on a transgender person being a Communion Server? Our church is allowing this person to serve Communion and it bothers me. Am I wrong to feel this way?
none of that changes the reality that the child is still a boy.If a boy hates toy soldiers, wants to dress like a girl, and play with dolls, (in spite of the bullying they receive from their parents, peers, and society), then there’s probably a reason for it.
This ruling was in response to a question from a Spanish bishop; I do not know if the documented response is floating around out there somewhere (can’t find it if it is) but the bishop made the Vatican’s response public:Please link the document from the CDF. Thanks
In their response, the congregation – charged with safeguarding Catholic teaching – said that it is “impossible to allow” a person with transsexual behavior to be a baptismal godmother or godfather.
In the Vatican’s full response – which the bishop provided in his statement – the congregation explained that transsexual behavior “reveals in a public way an attitude opposite to the moral imperative of solving the problem of sexual identity according to the truth of one’s own sexuality.”
“Therefore it is evident that this person does not possess the requirement of leading a life according to the faith and in the position of godfather and is therefore unable to be admitted to the position of godfather or godmother,” they said, referring to canon 874 §3 in the Code of Canon Law.
However, the congregation stressed that there is “no discrimination toward (Alex), but only the recognition of an objective lack of the requirements, which by their nature are necessary to assume the ecclesial responsibility of being a godfather.”
Certainly.I think first we must realize none of the “communion servers” are sinless.
No, its not acceptable, its a grave scandal and no you are not wrong to feel this way as transgenderism is unnatural. Gender dysphoria or transgenderism are unnatural confused inclinations as is homosexuality and it is a grave sin to act on either as it is contrary to nature and the natural law, objective truth, and common sense as God created human beings, male and female, he created them. Various factors may lessen the person’s culpability especially in children who may struggle with various disordered sexual desires or sexual identity.What is the church’s position on a transgender person being a Communion Server? Our church is allowing this person to serve Communion and it bothers me. Am I wrong to feel this way?
So, if someone has Tourette Syndrome, does that go against the natural sensibilities of some Christians?No, you’re certainly not wrong to feel this way. I’m not sure what the Church’s official stance on the matter is, or if She even has an official stance, but it is seriously wrong to have as a communion server someone whose behavior or appearance goes against the natural (and therefore entirely justified) sensibilities of other Christians.
Medical reasons are not a valid excuse. If someone has Gilles-de-la-Tourette syndrome we don’t make him a communion server either. Not everybody is suitable for every task, or entitled to it.
What do we know about this person’s lifestyle?Yes, but what if there are others who are being deceived as to the Church’s teachings on human sexuality as a result of the seeming endorsement of this person’s public lifestyle by this parish?