Bry:
I personally don’t see anything morally apprehensible about these TV shows. Entertainment is what you make of it. If you are watching nip/tuck and are dreaming of yourself being involved in the same immorality as they are, then of course you are sinning. I, for one, can watch those shows and be disgusted by the characters actions but still enjoy the show. Real life is full of immorality and if we are never ever exposed to it, how will we deal with it in the world? A devout and contemplative Christian can use these shows as a way to develop his/her conscience. He/she can examine what to do if ever confronted with similar situations. Isn’t this how we are supposed to form a good conscience?
When we were in school we read books about immoral characters (even pagans). Is this immoral? No, of course not. Even in Catholic schools we read books like Macbeth and other stories full of blood and adultery and pagan worship.
Jesus never condemned entertainment (like plays) that contained immorality in the script nor did the Apostles. If a person feels that a particular TV program may lead them to sin, then I would advise that person to avoid it. Bottom line…it’s ubsurd to say that a particular TV program could be a sin to watch. If that’s the case then I guess we have to avoid great Shakespeare classics and Greek Mythology and even Harry Potter for his sorcery!
Good points
I agree with everything you say - trouble is, I also agree with Brad. OTO, I find a film such as “Scream” (say) hilarious. I think the alarm is excessive.
If we wanted to avoid even the occasion of sin, I don’t know whom we could read. Until quite recently, Boccaccio’s
Decameron was not allowed in the US without being expurgated - he is very funny, but some of the stories he tells *are *bawdy.
The Greek and Roman Classics are full of immoral acts of every kind - cannibalism, murder, infanticide, incest, parricide, matricide, adultery, betrayal, & murder, for a start. This has not prevented the Classics being a staple of education for over a thousand years.
Shakespeare, as you point out, is a “no go area” - his plays have ambition, treason, murder, witchcraft, despair, hatred, treachery, vengefulness: and that’s just “Macbeth”; one play down - thirty-six to go.
In Dickens there are countless evils: assault, murder, embezzlement, suicide, hypocrisy, deceit, wrathfulness, cruelty, pride, oppression of the poor, vanity, are just a few of them. And he is one major novelist of very many whose works might be found unacceptable - but: people can do immoral acts in a story, without the story-teller’s being a bad man - one cannot reason from the badness of the one to the badness of the other; it would be odd to suppose that because there are bad characters in C.S. Lewis’ books he was therefore exalting badness or was himself a wicked man. A tale of evil deeds can be very instructive - who wants to end up like the Suitors in the Odyssey, or like a Dickens villain, or like Tolkien’s Saruman ?
As for European literature generally; despite the false gods, and unChristian values in the Classical authors, and the endless evils described in every major author from Dante to the present day, it’s read by Christians; many of whom have contributed to writing it. ##