I
Irishmom2
Guest
You do know that there is a whole world of people outside of Nebraska, don’t you? 
I know plenty of wonderful young Catholic women down here who are still single in their late 20s, early 30s. Couples seem to get married later and later, so 25 is nowhere near over the hill.I guess I meant most by meaning those who aren’t really attached to the church. At least in most parishes in my area most women my age if they attend church are married and have a kid by my age. There aren’t really any single women in any nearby parishes. Like I said though i’m in a smaller community.
(Emphasis added)OP, while financial stability and provision is often attractive to women,** so is a man who works hard and is goal-oriented, even if he doesn’t yet have much money sitting in the bank. ** Women your age don’t necessarily need to be financially supported right off the bat, as they usually work as well. Instead of focusing on the *immediate *need to provide for a woman, why not consider that both you and a wife could join salaries and save money for a couple of years before having your first child?
I would say the greater impediments to considering marriage are a lack of responsibility, and a lack of moral integrity, and the lack of an understanding of the sacrifices that come with taking these vows. That you don’t already have an accumulation of assets at your age is a temporary condition, and hopefully one that will change in the near future, considering that you are working toward the means of achieving career stability. Since you currently have two jobs, are furthering your education, and are concerned about being a good provider, it seems as though you already have many of the qualities and mindset that would make for a good husband.:
Finish your degree, move to a bigger city with a sizable Catholic population, and join a Catholic young adults group. And RELAX.
Not quite right. I hope you didn’t mean to be so rigid in your stance that NFP is wrong in the situations you mentioned. The Church Herself gives couples more freedom than you outline here. Maternal age and increasing risk of birth defects are both very legitimate reasons for practicing NFP to prevent future pregnancies. You cannot say that using NFP for these reasons is “not ok”, because, in fact, it is okay. And finally, couples that practice NFP are still open to life. That is, when they engage in the marital act, the act itself is still ordered to procreation. The question of what is a serious/just reason is left up to each couple to decide between themselves. ‘40’ might feel very differently to two different mothers. What is good for one might not be good for another, so blanket statements about what is appropriate for whom should be avoided.Also, in marriage you need to be open to new life even after age 40. Using NFP to prevent bad teeth is not ok, and the risk of Down syndrome is increased, but still 99 out of 100 babies born after 40 are perfectly fine.
It’s not wrong to choose not to marry, in fact Christ encourages us not to as he says marriage is a very difficult path. And I can confirm that it is.Is it? I just turned 25 and already i feel like a loser not just for not being married but for not even really being able to consider it (I’m getting my masters in special education but right now I substitute teach and work for just above minimum wage at a grocery store so no way to support someone even if I could get a relationship). Anyway I’m thinking that at 30 i’m just going to give up on finding someone. Honestly at that point I feel like all the good women will be taken. Also a lot of it for me is i don’t want the risk of having unhealthy kids. Don’t get me wrong, I love and feel that we need to do better in helping kids with disabilities, but at the same time I don’t want to have to risk my kids being born with something like down syndrome just because me and their mother married at 40 which increases the risk. Also in my own family my mom and dad were 38 and 45 when they married and I suffer from emotional issues and my sister suffers from bad teeth and severe depression because my mom was on heart medication and couple that with old eggs it leads to issues. And to top it off my brother has high functioning autism. So I don’t want my future kids to suffer with these problems just because my wife and i are over the age when someone should have kids ( also don’t get me wrong if you want to have kids over a certain age fine. I am pro life but honestly after a certain age maybe it should be more likely you have to practice NFP or something). So is it wrong to just give up on marriage and stay celibate if I don’t find someone after 30?
Look i’m sorry that i offended you and i’m sure you’re sister and law is a wonderful woman and in her case she would be a wonderful spouse but how many women are in her situation at a young age? And it’s not the child that’s horrible its that I guess I just want someone more compatible. The virgin thing I could care less about but at the same time I am one too and i’ve even heard on this site that it is hard when one spouse is a virgin and one isn’t. I really don’t mean to be judgmental, part of it is too a lot of single moms don’t really go to church either. That’s the key. Maybe if there was one i’d think about it but as of now there isn’t and I know i’m not strong enough to lead someone into the church (not that i have to do much of the leading).You know, sometimes a single mom isn’t a promiscuous drug addict. Maybe you need to stop being so judgmental. You might become more attractive to good women if you were.
Is a single mom that is widowed with a young child (my sister in law was widowed at 24 with a 3 year old boy), that goes to Mass and follows her faith considered a poor choice for a wife? If so, why? Is it because she has a child? What about a single mom that has returned to the Church and is raising her child in the faith. Once again, why would the fact she has a child be so horrible? Are you only interested in a perfect woman who is a virgin to share your life with? Well, no matter how old or young you are you will have a hard time finding the impossible. No one is perfect. Many are virgins, but all have faults. You may be overlooking some beautiful souls by being so stereotypical.
Then again, you are only 25…
Thank you for sharing this information. For myself personally, pregnancies have been much harder in my 30s than they were in 20s. Childbirth is more intense now, too. I have had miscarriages in my 30s. I am willing to go through this once or twice more, before I hit 40, because I love my children and it is worth it. But the health risks I will be facing in the near future are nothing to shrug off. My husband and I are in full agreement that NFP will be necessary at that point, regrettably. I think that many people are not aware of these difficulties and dangers, or they may minimize them because they have not yet faced them.For the older mother, there’s not just the problem of it being there being a higher risk of disabled children. It’s also the case that the risk of miscarriage spikes starting after 40. This chart shows that in the 40-44 group, there’s around a 50% chance of miscarriage.
geneticsandfertility.com/maternal-age-reproduction/
Then there’s the issue of physical wear and tear on the mother–it is medically riskier for her in a variety of different ways in later years. Not that it isn’t worth doing or that lots of healthy and/or happy children aren’t born to older mothers, but it is a much riskier activity.
I made a distinction that there are definitely good women out there that are a bit older, but just that you have to be more discerning because there are a lot of women that are unmarried for a reason, because they chose to live a promiscuous lifestyle in their youth.I think some of the comments in this thread concerning women have been uncharitable. I have read many posts in this sub-forum over the last couple years by unmarried women in their late 20’s, 30’s, 40’s, and beyond, who are greatly saddened by the fact that they were still unmarried; without prospect at the time of posting; but still felt great desire to be married. Comments like “all the good women will be taken” by age XX are probably like daggers through the hearts of some of them.
The more intently I focus on my problems, failures, and disappointments, the more uncharitable my thoughts, words, and actions towards others become.
I will pray for all those feeling called to marriage, but encountering frustration in answering that call.
Wow i’m sorry I opened up a firestorm. I truly don’t mean to be uncharitable. I guess like Irish Mom said sometimes I don’t see the world outside of my hometown and home state. Even then i’m sure i’m making too many negative assumptions. I don’t mean to say that women who are still single after 25 aren’t any good at all. I guess at times I just feel like there isn’t an abundance of good catholic women out there where I live. It gets tough. I’m sure women feel the same way and probably more so since so many guys now a days are just players who mess around and don’t want to get married. Also i’m sorry if I sound so mean. I guess my online persona is more negative than my real one where I do get complements about being funny and having an attractive personality (by someone with a boyfriend of course:shrug:holy face said:
“I made a distinction that there are definitely good women out there that are a bit older, but just that you have to be more discerning because there are a lot of women that are unmarried for a reason, because they chose to live a promiscuous lifestyle in their youth.”
Doesn’t the exact same concern apply to older, unmarried men? Shouldn’t a younger woman be concerned that an older single guy has got chlamydia, HPV, herpes, and so forth? Chlamydia can destroy female fertility, HPV can kill her, and herpes can blind their baby.
Regarding HPV, anyone whos ever had sex likely already has it. Its up to women to have normal checks ups and be responsible for their health. For men, there is no test and no real danger.holy face said:
“I made a distinction that there are definitely good women out there that are a bit older, but just that you have to be more discerning because there are a lot of women that are unmarried for a reason, because they chose to live a promiscuous lifestyle in their youth.”
Doesn’t the exact same concern apply to older, unmarried men? Shouldn’t a younger woman be concerned that an older single guy has got chlamydia, HPV, herpes, and so forth? Chlamydia can destroy female fertility, HPV can kill her, and herpes can blind their baby.
From the CDC: HPV and MenRegarding HPV, anyone whos ever had sex likely already has it. Its up to women to have normal checks ups and be responsible for their health. For men, there is no test and no real danger.
There are usually serious reasons why an older woman is unmarried, as holy face said. Women can find a guy very easily and there are all sorts of men willing to settle with almost any woman, so the fact that they havent settled might be a red flag.
The same is not true for a man, as its much harder to even make friends with a woman and just as hard to maintain that friendship. Women reject men for all kinds of superficial reasons, so its not a really a red flag or unusual for a man to be older and single.