Is Jesus a feminist?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Curious11
  • Start date Start date
Status
Not open for further replies.
Oh believe me, I try to steer clear of politics, I consider it a major distraction from God’s commandment to love our neighbors. The definition of feminism applied here refers merely to equal rights for men and women, no feminazi politics
 
Last edited:
What do you mean by that? A lot of men define “trying to be better” as anything that takes women out of the kitchen.
 
To quote a comedy movie, the husband may be the head but the woman is the neck. Yes he’s the final say the neck knows how to turn a head.
So now we’re quoting “My Big Fat Greek Wedding” to make theological arguments? Geez Louise.
 
Hi! Yes Higher levels of testosterone are linked to higher levels of aggression. There’s this syndrome where a boy ends up having one X chromosome and two Y chromosomes (XYY instead of XY). I heard that those kinda people are more prone to commit crimes.
Most men with XYY syndrome actually have normal testosterone levels.
 
Oh yes, the “ancient times” are a great example for us to follow. Now excuse me while I go and sacrifice my child slave to Baal.
This is coming from the guy who wants to base society off of ancient gender roles. Glass houses…
 
The Independent isn’t a peer-reviewed journal. Try again.
Peer-reviewed research is often corrupt, especially on this issue.
No, Jesus is God. Why people want to keep trying to put political labels on God is beyond me.
I don’t think anyone is doing that. It’s just social liberals in the West who use that in order to justify their positions are some other opposition parties are more in sync not only with Catholic teaching but what works in real life.
 
In ancient times Woman ruled Great Nations.
Example:> Cleopatra, Queen of Sheba, Queen of Iceni, Artemisia, a woman ruler of Halicarnassus, Queen of the Brigantee, Hatshepsut Woman Ruler of Egypt, Cleopatra Thea,ruler of Syria. etc etc
There were many Woman who helped Jesus, who were successful wealthy woman, who were looked upon >>highly within their community, educated and open up their homes to Jesus to preach in,helped in his ministry etc Peace 🙂
I’m not talking about whether women ruled, but how - in response to the earlier assertion that women would be “fightier” (to coin a phrase) on the whole than men.

I say not. I say compare almost any of these female rulers (eg Cleopatra) to her male counterparts (Julius Caesar, Marc Antony and Octavian/Augustus) in terms of bloodshed and warmongering, the women are mostly very minor league. Cleopatra’s only real battles were Actium (which she ran away from) and a fight with an asp.
 
Last edited:
Okay. FWIW, mainstream feminism doesn’t consider women “better.”
 
Of course it does. What’s more, it still wants to overthrow the Patriarchy - men. In a local publication, the head of a businesswomen’s group stated that after all these years, she was surprised that women still do not own most businesses. Apparently, equality is not the goal.
 
Of course it does. What’s more, it still wants to overthrow the Patriarchy - men. In a local publication, the head of a businesswomen’s group stated that after all these years, she was surprised that women still do not own most businesses. Apparently, equality is not the goal.
No it doesn’t, and the Patriarchy =/= male humans. I don’t see how you got “equality not being the goal” from that woman’s comment. There’s nothing un-egalitatarian about wanting more women in business.
 
It’s a fact. It also enables people to not make real arguments and hide behind an appeal to authority.
But don’t you see you’re making an appeal to authority by claiming your own opinions as facts without offering any evidence to back them up?
 
Feminist icon, Gloria Steinem, co-founder of Ms. magazine (yes, that’s where that divisive word comes from); “A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle.” I was there for the Women’s Liberation Movement. “Sisters! Throw off the chains of your oppression!” Men - all men - were called “male chauvenist pigs.” It was classic Marxist class warfare: women, the eternal victims class, and men, the eternal enemies class (no, I’m not referring to cases of abuse).

Then women were led to college indoctrination camps called ‘Women’s Studies.’
 
If I had to take a guess, a man always has the same title. He is always a Mr. But a woman’s title is based on her martial status. Ms. is supposed to be “marital neutral”.
 
Feminist icon, Gloria Steinem, co-founder of Ms. magazine (yes, that’s where that divisive word comes from); “A woman needs a man like a fish needs a bicycle.” I was there for the Women’s Liberation Movement. “Sisters! Throw off the chains of your oppression!” Men - all men - were called “male chauvenist pigs.” It was classic Marxist class warfare: women, the eternal victims class, and men, the eternal enemies class (no, I’m not referring to cases of abuse).

Then women were led to college indoctrination camps called ‘Women’s Studies.’
If they overreacted, can you really blame them for it? Assuming contemporary accounts are anything to go by, pre-1960s American society didn’t necessarily value women as rational, intelligent agents.

I was born in the mid-nineties, and the feminism I’ve grown up with is one that generally encourages discourse and celebrates human autonomy. Yes, the support for abortion is wrong. It’s the one thing that I and this current vision of feminism will never have in common. However, when all is said and done, I’m grateful to have been born in a generation that is able to reap the fruits of feminist activism. I embrace feminism partly because I know that those who are enamored with the Patriarchy will never see me as a fully-formed, autonomous adult, and I want such people to have as little say in my life as possible.
 
Last edited:
This is coming from the guy who wants to base society off of ancient gender roles. Glass houses…
The difference being that gender roles are taught by holy mother church. Child sacrifice is not.
The Independent isn’t a peer-reviewed journal. Try again.
Why do you think Einstein, Nicola Tesla, Isaac Newton, Leonardo Da Vinci, Gottfried Liebniz, Aristotle, Johann Goethe, James Clark Maxwell and Galileo were ALL MEN?

And why do you think 95% of the prison population is male in every country in the world? Is it just a consequence of evil traditional gender roles?
 
Why do you think Einstein, Nicola Tesla, Isaac Newton, Leonardo Da Vinci, Gottfried Liebniz, Aristotle, Johann Goethe, James Clark Maxwell and Galileo were ALL MEN?
Because their mamas’ eggs were fertilized with Y-sperm.

What a weird question.
 
You’re trolling now. G’night son.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top